發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-01-27 11:23

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 過(guò)來(lái) 過(guò)去 趨向動(dòng)詞 不對(duì)稱 認(rèn)知圖景　出處：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：本文運(yùn)用句法語(yǔ)義學(xué)、認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)的基本概念和理論,討論現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)趨向動(dòng)詞“過(guò)來(lái)”“過(guò)去”前的動(dòng)詞特點(diǎn),考察了“過(guò)來(lái)”“過(guò)去”的語(yǔ)義特征和句式特點(diǎn),并以認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)的“不對(duì)稱”理論為基礎(chǔ),從語(yǔ)義角度對(duì)“過(guò)來(lái)”“過(guò)去”進(jìn)行比較,最后用認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)認(rèn)知圖景理論對(duì)“過(guò)來(lái)”“過(guò)去”的區(qū)別進(jìn)行解釋。 本論文分五個(gè)部分。 第一章主要介紹課題研究的意義、研究綜述、研究的理論背景和方法,并對(duì)語(yǔ)料的來(lái)源進(jìn)行了說(shuō)明。 第二章主要研究了“過(guò)來(lái)”“過(guò)去”的語(yǔ)義。首先對(duì)“V過(guò)來(lái)”“V過(guò)去”結(jié)構(gòu)中的V進(jìn)行語(yǔ)義分類分析,接著從四個(gè)不同的認(rèn)知域?qū)Α癡過(guò)來(lái)”和“V過(guò)去”的語(yǔ)義特點(diǎn)進(jìn)行重新分類。這四個(gè)認(rèn)知域分別是空間域、時(shí)間域、狀態(tài)域和結(jié)果域,本文的分類和以往最大的不同在于時(shí)間域。 第三章主要研究了“過(guò)來(lái)”“過(guò)去”的句型特點(diǎn)和句式。本章以上一章歸納的語(yǔ)義類為句式劃分的基礎(chǔ),對(duì)“過(guò)來(lái)”“過(guò)去”所在的句式進(jìn)行分類,通過(guò)對(duì)句式特點(diǎn)的研究深入了解“過(guò)來(lái)”“過(guò)去”不同語(yǔ)義類的語(yǔ)義。在分類的同時(shí),發(fā)現(xiàn)在特殊的認(rèn)知域中表示不同的語(yǔ)義時(shí),句式結(jié)構(gòu)存在區(qū)別,做到了形式和意義的統(tǒng)一 第四章對(duì)“過(guò)來(lái)”“過(guò)去”進(jìn)行比較研究。首先運(yùn)用“不對(duì)稱”理論對(duì)“過(guò)來(lái)”“過(guò)去”的語(yǔ)義進(jìn)行比較,在不同的認(rèn)知域中對(duì)“過(guò)來(lái)”“過(guò)去”的“對(duì)稱”“不對(duì)稱”進(jìn)行歸納。其次運(yùn)用認(rèn)知圖景理論和隱喻,從認(rèn)知圖景凸顯的激活要素與語(yǔ)義的關(guān)系角度對(duì)“過(guò)來(lái)”“過(guò)去”表空間義這個(gè)最主要的區(qū)別進(jìn)行分析,同時(shí)從隱喻角度對(duì)表非空間義時(shí)的區(qū)別進(jìn)行分析。 最后是結(jié)語(yǔ)。整理和總結(jié)了本文討論的內(nèi)容,并指出本文研究中尚存在的不足和今后值得深入研究的問(wèn)題。
[Abstract]:Based on the basic concepts and theories of syntactic semantics and cognitive linguistics, this paper discusses the characteristics of verbs before the verb "come" and "the past" in modern Chinese. This paper examines the semantic features and sentence patterns of the past, and compares the past with the past from the semantic point of view based on the theory of asymmetry in cognitive linguistics. Finally, the cognitive map theory of cognitive linguistics is used to explain the difference between "come" and "past". This paper is divided into five parts. The first chapter mainly introduces the significance of the research, the research review, the theoretical background and methods of the research, and explains the source of the corpus. The second chapter mainly studies the semantics of "come over" and "past". Firstly, it analyzes the semantic classification of V in the structure of "V over" and "V past". Then the semantic features of "V over" and "V past" are reclassified from four different cognitive domains, namely, spatial domain, time domain, state domain and result domain. The biggest difference between the classification of this paper and the past lies in the time domain. The third chapter mainly studies the sentence patterns and sentence patterns of "come" and "the past". The semantic categories summarized in this chapter are the basis of the classification of sentence patterns, and the sentence patterns of "past" are classified. Through the study of the characteristics of sentence patterns, we can deeply understand the semantics of different semantic classes of "come over" and "past". While classifying, we find that there are differences in sentence structures when different semantics are represented in special cognitive domains. Unity of form and meaning Chapter 4th makes a comparative study of "past" and "past". Firstly, it uses the theory of "asymmetry" to compare the semantics of "coming" and "past". The "symmetry" and "asymmetry" of "come over" and "past" are summed up in different cognitive domains. Secondly, cognitive map theory and metaphor are used. From the angle of the relation between the activation elements and the semantics of the cognitive map, this paper analyzes the most important difference between the meaning of "come" and "the past", and analyzes the difference of the non-spatial meaning of the table from the perspective of metaphor. Finally, the conclusion is given. The contents of this paper are summarized, and the shortcomings of this study and the problems worth further study are pointed out.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：H146

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 盧英順;現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)中的“延續(xù)體”[J];安徽師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年03期

2 沈家煊;R.W.Langacker的“認(rèn)知語(yǔ)法”[J];國(guó)外語(yǔ)言學(xué);1994年01期

3 曾傳祿;;“過(guò)來(lái)”“過(guò)去”的用法及其認(rèn)知解釋[J];西華師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年02期

4 張伯江;動(dòng)趨式里賓語(yǔ)位置的制約因素[J];漢語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí);1991年06期

5 肖奚強(qiáng);也談"來(lái)"和"去[J];漢語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí);2003年02期

6 馬玉汴;;趨向動(dòng)詞的認(rèn)知分析[J];漢語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí);2005年06期

7 劉廣和;說(shuō)“上_2、下_2……起來(lái)_2”──兼談趨向補(bǔ)語(yǔ)、動(dòng)趨式[J];漢語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí);1999年02期

8 崔希亮;;“把”字句的若干句法語(yǔ)義問(wèn)題[J];世界漢語(yǔ)教學(xué);1995年03期

9 齊滬揚(yáng);;空間位移中主觀參照“來(lái)／去”的語(yǔ)用含義[J];世界漢語(yǔ)教學(xué);1996年04期

10 陸儉明;;動(dòng)詞后趨向補(bǔ)語(yǔ)和賓語(yǔ)的位置問(wèn)題[J];世界漢語(yǔ)教學(xué);2002年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陳賢;現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)動(dòng)詞“來(lái)、去”的語(yǔ)義研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 高艷;復(fù)合趨向補(bǔ)語(yǔ)不對(duì)稱現(xiàn)象研究[D];首都師范大學(xué);2007年

2 孫思;現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)動(dòng)趨式研究[D];四川師范大學(xué);2009年

3 張慧;“V過(guò)來(lái)”的句法語(yǔ)義分析及“過(guò)來(lái)”的虛化探索[D];上海師范大學(xué);2009年

4 葛顯嬌;對(duì)稱與不對(duì)稱：上來(lái)/上去、下來(lái)/下去之比較研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1468354