“一量(的)名”結(jié)構(gòu)研究
本文關(guān)鍵詞: 量詞 名詞 的 認知 主觀量 出處:《渤海大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文 論文類型:學(xué)位論文
【摘要】:“一+量詞+名詞”結(jié)構(gòu)(簡稱“一量名”結(jié)構(gòu))是一種常見的“數(shù)量名”結(jié)構(gòu),“的”是現(xiàn)代漢語中使用頻率最高的詞,然而有的“一量名”結(jié)構(gòu)中可以加“的”,有的“一量名”結(jié)構(gòu)中不可以加“的”。通過對《現(xiàn)代漢語詞典》(第5版)中有明確標注的464個專用物量詞及日常生活中使用頻率較高的借用量詞的分析研究,發(fā)現(xiàn)由這些量詞構(gòu)成的“一量名”結(jié)構(gòu)與“的”的關(guān)系可以從如下三個角度進行分析:“一+專用量詞+名詞”結(jié)構(gòu)與“的”、“一+借用量詞+名詞”結(jié)構(gòu)與“的”以及“一+量詞+名詞”結(jié)構(gòu)變式與“的”。 研究發(fā)現(xiàn):當“一量名”結(jié)構(gòu)中的量詞為專用量詞中的個體量詞、集合量詞、不定量詞及動源量詞時,,該結(jié)構(gòu)多數(shù)情況下不加“的”,但少數(shù)情況下為了起強調(diào)作用也可以加“的”;當“一量名”結(jié)構(gòu)中的量詞為名源量詞或結(jié)構(gòu)中量詞重疊時,該結(jié)構(gòu)加不加“的”皆可;當“一量名”結(jié)構(gòu)中的量詞為度量衡量詞時,多數(shù)情況下加不加“的”皆可,少數(shù)情況下必須加“的”。 “一量名”結(jié)構(gòu)中一般情況下不可以插入“的”,但有些情況下卻可以。這種現(xiàn)象除了取決于量詞自身的一些語法、語義特征外,還與結(jié)構(gòu)中量詞語法化程度的高低有關(guān)。量詞語法化程度越高,該結(jié)構(gòu)越不易與“的”連用;而量詞語法化程度越低,該結(jié)構(gòu)越易與“的”連用。此外,這種現(xiàn)象還與量詞在語義上跟數(shù)詞“一”與名詞二者在語義聯(lián)系上的緊密程度有關(guān)。當量詞與數(shù)詞“一”語義上結(jié)合緊密,以表示名詞的數(shù)量時,一般名詞之前可以加“的”;當量詞和名詞結(jié)合更為緊密,主要對名詞起限定、描繪作用而不是重在計量時,則名詞前不能加“的”。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),多數(shù)情況下“一量的名”結(jié)構(gòu)具有表達主觀大量的作用,但也有一少部分的“一量的名”結(jié)構(gòu)可以表達主觀小量,這主要與量詞的量級及語境等因素有關(guān)。
[Abstract]:The structure of "one quantifier noun" (abbreviated as "one quantity name") is a kind of common "quantity name" structure, and "one measure noun" is the most frequently used word in modern Chinese. However, there are "one quantity name" structure can be added "." Some "can't be added" in the structure of "one quantity name". Through the "Modern Chinese Dictionary" (5th edition). The analysis and research of 464 special object classifiers and loan quantifiers which are frequently used in daily life. It is found that the relationship between the structure and the structure of a quantifier can be analyzed from the following three angles: "structure and" of a special classifier noun. A borrowed classifier noun "structure and" and "a quantifier noun" "structural variation and". It is found that when the quantifiers in the "one-measure name" structure are individual quantifiers, aggregate quantifiers, indefinite quantifiers and verb-source quantifiers in the special quantifier, the structure will not be added in most cases. In a few cases, however, "" can be added in order to play an important role "; When the quantifier in the "one quantity name" structure is a nominal-source quantifier or the quantifier in the structure is overlapped, the structure can be added "or not". When the quantifier in the structure of "one quantity name" is a measure and measure word, in most cases "can" is added without "," "must be added" in a few cases. "A quantifier" structure is not normally allowed to insert "", but in some cases it can. This phenomenon depends on the grammatical and semantic features of the quantifier itself. It also has something to do with the grammaticalization of classifiers in the structure. The higher the grammaticalization of classifiers, the more difficult the structure is to be used with "the". The lower the grammaticalization of quantifiers, the easier the structure is to be used with "". This phenomenon is also related to the degree of semantic connection between quantifiers and numerals "one" and nouns. When quantifiers and numerals "one" are closely combined semantically to represent the number of nouns. General nouns can be preceded by ""; " When quantifiers and nouns are more closely combined, mainly limited to nouns, descriptive function rather than emphasis on measurement, then nouns can not be added before "." In most cases, "one quantity of name" structure can express a large number of subjective functions, but there is also a small part of "a quantity of name" structure can express a small amount of subjective, which is mainly related to the quantifier's order of magnitude and context and other factors.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:渤海大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號】:H146
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 呂傳峰;經(jīng)濟性原則在語用中的體現(xiàn)形式及其成因[J];常熟高專學(xué)報;2002年05期
2 張連生;詞性確定的原則和方法[J];東北師大學(xué)報;1992年04期
3 沈家煊;R.W.Langacker的“認知語法”[J];國外語言學(xué);1994年01期
4 Bernd Heine,馬壯寰;《語法的認知基礎(chǔ)》簡介[J];當代語言學(xué);2000年01期
5 沈家煊;實詞虛化的機制──《演化而來的語法》評介[J];當代語言學(xué);1998年03期
6 范利,聶春梅;從認知語言學(xué)看名詞臨時作量詞的語義演變規(guī)律[J];湖南第一師范學(xué)報;2001年01期
7 沈家煊;語用法的語法化[J];福建外語;1998年02期
8 張延俊;也論漢語“數(shù)·量·名”形式的產(chǎn)生[J];古漢語研究;2002年02期
9 宗守云;;論“數(shù)+形+量”格式中量詞和形容詞的語義選擇[J];廣西師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2008年05期
10 馮廣藝;量詞研究三題[J];湖北師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2005年01期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 王冬梅;現(xiàn)代漢語動名互轉(zhuǎn)的認知研究[D];中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院;2001年
2 李善熙;漢語“主觀量”的表達研究[D];中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院;2003年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 劉晨紅;現(xiàn)代漢語臨時名量詞的認知研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2007年
2 姜云龍;現(xiàn)代漢語物量詞研究[D];首都師范大學(xué);2008年
本文編號:1464639
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/1464639.html