廣告作品的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)初探
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, with the rapid development of the market economy, the advertising industry has also developed. And the increasing rate of increasing by an average of more than 40% per year. Nowadays, advertising is one of the most famous and most frequent economic phenomena. At the same time, there is a growing number of infringements caused by advertising works. The current research on the protection of intellectual property rights of advertising is worrying. Only a few mathematicians are involved in this, and they are both simple and not in-depth. It is more difficult to see in the current law and is one of the gaps in the legislative research.
This article will analyze the protection of intellectual property rights of advertising works, but this article focuses on the scope of intellectual property rights, and theoretically analyzes the different advertising works can be protected by copyright law as a work, or can be used as a "business secret" or as a "commercial sign". The protection of the law of unfair competition. As to how to carry out the operation, such as the determination of the tort and the legal responsibility, it is not discussed in this article for the length and the limitation of the author's ability. The full text of the full text is divided into five parts.
Part one: overview of intellectual property protection of advertising works.
In this part, the author focuses on the analysis of the concept and relationship between advertising creativity and advertising works, and then concludes the definition and characteristics of intellectual property protection in advertising works. The author thinks that advertising creativity is a creative idea produced by advertisers to achieve the goal of advertising. Advertising creation can be divided into two meanings, and advertising works are widely used. The author defines it as: an advertisement is an intellectual achievement produced by an advertisement designer in a literary, artistic, or scientific field that is produced in a literary, artistic, or scientific field that is carried out for the advertiser or service. It includes advertising music, advertising art, and so on. In the narrow sense, the advertisement works include advertisement works in broad sense. Secondly, from the perspective of intellectual property, the author uses intellectual property law to provide protection for the content of the advertisement works and the content of the protection of the object in accordance with the intellectual property law in the process of its formation. It explains the necessity of intellectual property protection for advertising works.
The second part: the protection of the copyright law of the advertisement works
In this part, the author mainly analyzes from the following aspects: 1) advertising works can be classified into literature, art or science. Modern advertising is not only the carrier of commodity information, but also a cultural form, with profound cultural connotations. The author thinks that the advertisement copywriting can be classified into the literary works, the advertising music can be classified into the music works, and so on,.2 Advertising works have the originality required by law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2005
【分類號(hào)】:D923.4
【共引文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 杜仲霞;;馳名商標(biāo)權(quán)濫用及其法律規(guī)制[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年02期
2 林子英,劉德恒;兩種確定商標(biāo)權(quán)利范圍理論在司法實(shí)踐中的運(yùn)用[J];中華商標(biāo);2003年08期
3 林海濤;商標(biāo)淡化理論應(yīng)慎用[J];中華商標(biāo);2004年01期
4 許麗;姓名諧音商標(biāo)違反誠信原則[J];中華商標(biāo);2004年08期
5 彭學(xué)龍;張奕峰;;“藍(lán)色風(fēng)暴”考量“反向混淆”[J];中華商標(biāo);2006年11期
6 來小鵬;著作權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓比較研究[J];比較法研究;2005年05期
7 江帆;商譽(yù)與商譽(yù)侵權(quán)的競爭法規(guī)制[J];比較法研究;2005年05期
8 鄭納新;我國著作權(quán)集體管理組織建設(shè)若干問題的思考[J];編輯之友;2005年03期
9 黃輝;論附贈(zèng)式有獎(jiǎng)銷售中的商業(yè)贈(zèng)品責(zé)任[J];北京科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1999年04期
10 龐華玲;我國反不正當(dāng)競爭法中存在的幾個(gè)問題[J];北京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年03期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前3條
1 張雪樵;;獨(dú)家分銷權(quán)保護(hù)之研究[A];中國律師2000年大會(huì)論文精選(上卷)[C];2000年
2 李德成;;域名轉(zhuǎn)讓過程中的商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)[A];信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)與高新技術(shù)法律前沿——中華全國律師協(xié)會(huì)信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)與高新技術(shù)專業(yè)委員會(huì)成立大會(huì)論文集[C];2001年
3 郭俊;;搶注商標(biāo)及域名行為的法律分析[A];中華全國律師協(xié)會(huì)國際專業(yè)委員會(huì)2001年年會(huì)論文集[C];2001年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 周昀;反壟斷法論[D];中國政法大學(xué);2001年
2 文學(xué)國;濫用與規(guī)制[D];中國社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2002年
3 孫維佳;論歐盟電子商務(wù)消費(fèi)者權(quán)益保護(hù)制度[D];中國政法大學(xué);2004年
4 費(fèi)安玲;著作權(quán)的權(quán)利體系研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2004年
5 李曉民;地理標(biāo)志法律保護(hù)機(jī)制研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2005年
6 金YТ,
本文編號(hào):2144100
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/guanggaoshejilunwen/2144100.html