本文選題：商品銷售　切入點(diǎn)：信息披露　出處：《上海交通大學(xué)》2008年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 本文從商家信息披露義務(wù)的概念及其具有的即時性、全面性、客觀性、無償性、關(guān)聯(lián)性等五方面特征入手,追溯了信息披露義務(wù)在法國以“信息提供義務(wù)”名詞進(jìn)行的理論探討直至制度成形,以及在其它國家和地區(qū)的發(fā)展;論述了商家信息披露義務(wù)的理論根據(jù):1、誠實(shí)信用原則是信息披露義務(wù)理論的法哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ),2、契約公正從形式自由到實(shí)質(zhì)自由的轉(zhuǎn)變催生了信息披露義務(wù)理論,3、“市場失靈”的矯正及保護(hù)信息上的弱者成為信息披露義務(wù)理論產(chǎn)生的社會氛圍;分析了如何界定商家應(yīng)披露信息的內(nèi)容及披露方式和標(biāo)準(zhǔn);論正了商家違反信息披露義務(wù)的歸責(zé)原則——實(shí)行推定過錯責(zé)任原則,即商家只要不能證明自己已盡相當(dāng)之注意,因未披露相關(guān)信息而給消費(fèi)者造成損害即推定商家主觀上存在過錯,提出了商家不履行信息披露的責(zé)任設(shè)計(jì)——有限的民事責(zé)任和行政責(zé)任相結(jié)合;最后探討了我國目前在商家信息披露方面存在的諸多問題:信息披露缺乏真實(shí)性、不充分、不及時、不連續(xù)、存在隨意性。根據(jù)以上問題提出了相應(yīng)對策:1、健全公司治理機(jī)構(gòu),完善信息披露的內(nèi)在機(jī)制;2、推動相應(yīng)民事訴訟機(jī)制的建立,加大監(jiān)管力度;3、改進(jìn)商家的信息披露方式;4、強(qiáng)制商家履行吹牛廣告中的承諾即信息瑕疵擔(dān)保義務(wù)。
[Abstract]:This paper starts with the concept of merchant's information disclosure obligation and its characteristics of immediacy, comprehensiveness, objectivity, gratuitousness, relevance, etc. This paper traces the theoretical discussion of the obligation of information disclosure in France under the term "obligation to provide information" until the formation of the system, as well as the development in other countries and regions. This paper discusses the theoretical basis of merchant's information disclosure obligation:: 1, the principle of good faith is the legal philosophy foundation of the theory of information disclosure obligation. The transformation of contract justice from form freedom to substantial freedom gives birth to the theory of information disclosure obligation. The correction of "failure" and the protection of the weak in information become the social atmosphere produced by the theory of information disclosure obligation; This paper analyzes how to define the content, manner and standard of disclosure of information, discusses the principle of imputation of fault liability, that is, the merchant can not prove that he has paid enough attention to the breach of the obligation of information disclosure. Because of the damage caused to consumers by the failure to disclose relevant information, it is presumed that there is fault in the business subjectively. The author proposes the combination of limited civil liability and administrative liability, which is the responsibility of the merchant not to perform the disclosure of information. Finally, this paper discusses many problems existing in the field of business information disclosure in our country: lack of authenticity, insufficiency, intimeliness, discontinuity and arbitrariness of information disclosure. According to the above problems, this paper puts forward the corresponding countermeasures: 1, perfect the corporate governance organization, Perfecting the internal mechanism of information disclosure, promoting the establishment of corresponding civil litigation mechanism, strengthening supervision, improving the way of information disclosure of merchants, forcing the merchants to fulfill the promise of bragging advertisements, that is, the guarantee obligation of information defects.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號】：D913

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 方龍華,吳根發(fā);論合同法上的保密附隨義務(wù)[J];法律適用;2001年10期

2 彭正穗;民事法對市場信息不對稱的防范[J];中南財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2000年04期

，

本文編號：1586720