語(yǔ)言的評(píng)價(jià)系統(tǒng)是系統(tǒng)功能語(yǔ)言學(xué)的一個(gè)延伸和發(fā)展,是進(jìn)行話語(yǔ)分析研究、實(shí)現(xiàn)人際意義的重要手段。評(píng)價(jià)理論在語(yǔ)篇語(yǔ)義學(xué)層面進(jìn)行人際意義的表達(dá),包含態(tài)度系統(tǒng)、介入系統(tǒng)和級(jí)差系統(tǒng)。政治演講是演講者在政治活動(dòng)中用來(lái)表明政治立場(chǎng)、宣傳政治主張、影響民眾的一種公眾演講。在國(guó)內(nèi)外的政治活動(dòng)中,政治演講發(fā)揮著重要的作用。然而,由于不同國(guó)家在文化、價(jià)值觀、政治立場(chǎng)等方面有差異,政治演講中的評(píng)價(jià)資源在語(yǔ)篇語(yǔ)義學(xué)層面上的人際意義也有所不同。以往的學(xué)者研究主要集中在語(yǔ)言策略、批判性話語(yǔ)分析和認(rèn)知的角度,以評(píng)價(jià)理論為理論框架來(lái)研究政治演講尚為數(shù)不多,借助廣泛語(yǔ)料的漢英語(yǔ)篇的對(duì)比分析更少。本研究采用定性和定量相結(jié)合的研究方法,以國(guó)家高級(jí)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人的中英政治演講語(yǔ)篇為語(yǔ)料,以評(píng)價(jià)理論為框架,探究中英兩種語(yǔ)料中的評(píng)價(jià)資源使用的差異。本研究主要解決以下問(wèn)題:1.漢英政治演講在評(píng)價(jià)資源的使用上有什么差異?2.漢英政治演講中產(chǎn)生上述使用差異的原因有哪些?研究結(jié)果表明,在評(píng)價(jià)理論的三個(gè)子系統(tǒng)中,漢英政治演講中態(tài)度資源使用頻率都最高。在態(tài)度子系統(tǒng)中,漢語(yǔ)政治演講更多使用情感資源,而英語(yǔ)政治演講更多使用判斷資源。在介入子系統(tǒng)中,英語(yǔ)政治...

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：71 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
1 Introduction
    1.1 Background of the Study
    1.2 Purpose and Significance of the Study
    1.3 Structure of the Study
2 Literature Review
    2.1 A General Introduction to Appraisal Theory
        2.1.1 The Development of Appraisal Theory
        2.1.2 Attitude Subsystem
        2.1.3 Engagement Subsystem
        2.1.4 Graduation Subsystem
    2.2 Previous Studies on Political Speeches
        2.2.1 Relative Studies Abroad
        2.2.2 Relative Studies at Home
    2.3 Previous Studies on the Application of Appraisal Theory into Discourse Analysis
        2.3.1 Relative Studies Abroad
        2.3.2 Relative Studies at Home
    2.4 Achievements and Limitations of the Previous Studies
3 Methodology of the Study
    3.1 Questions of the Study
    3.2 Data Collection
    3.3 Proceduresof the Study
4 Contrastive Analysis of Appraisal Resources in Chinese and English Political Speech
    4.1 Contrastive Analysis of Appraisal Resources
    4.2 Contrastive Analysis of Attitude Resources
        4.2.1 An Overall Contrastive Analysis of Attitude Resources
        4.2.2 An OverallContrastive Analysis of Affect Resources
        4.2.3 An Overall Contrastive Analysis of Judgement Resources
        4.2.4 An Overall Contrastive Analysis of Appreciation Resources
    4.3 Contrastive Analysis of Engagement Resources
        4.3.1 An Overall Contrastive Analysis of Engagement Resources
        4.3.2 An Overall Contrastive Analysis of Dialogic Expansion Resources
        4.3.3 An Overall Contrastive Analysis of Dialogic Contraction Resources
    4.4 Contrastive Analysis of Graduation Resources
        4.4.1 An Overall Contrastive Analysis of Graduation Resources
        4.4.2 An Overall Contrastive Analysis of Force Resources
        4.4.3 An Overall Contrastive Analysis of Focus Resources
5 Conclusion
    5.1 Major Findings
    5.2 Implications
    5.3 Limitations of the Present Study
    5.4 Suggestions for Future Studies
References
Acknowledgements



本文編號(hào)：3931171