近三十年來,語言學(xué)界對于學(xué)術(shù)語篇中作者立場標(biāo)記語的研究熱情高漲。學(xué)術(shù)語篇是一種建構(gòu)身份的社會性行為,相關(guān)研究表明,作者在寫作過程中除對所做研究結(jié)果進(jìn)行匯報與討論外,也使用一系列的手段表達(dá)自己的立場,構(gòu)建自己的身份。這些在學(xué)術(shù)語篇中表達(dá)作者本人對于命題的態(tài)度、觀點(diǎn)、評價的語言手段就是立場標(biāo)記語。合理、高效地使用立場標(biāo)記語對于提升學(xué)術(shù)語篇的質(zhì)量至關(guān)重要。諸多研究也都證明了立場標(biāo)記語在評價文章質(zhì)量、建構(gòu)作者身份中的重要作用�？v觀這些研究,它們大多圍繞著對比中國英語學(xué)習(xí)者以及本族語使用者產(chǎn)出的學(xué)術(shù)語篇中立場標(biāo)記語的使用情況,鮮有將中國英語學(xué)習(xí)者與其他英語作為二語的學(xué)習(xí)者產(chǎn)出的學(xué)術(shù)語篇進(jìn)行比較的研究�；诖�,本研究采用Hyland(2005)提出的學(xué)術(shù)互動模型,選取了共20篇(中、奧各10篇)由中國英語專業(yè)碩士研究生和奧地利英語專業(yè)碩士研究生撰寫的碩士學(xué)位論文,并自建語料庫,借助AntConc軟件,對其中的模糊限制語、確定表達(dá)語、態(tài)度標(biāo)記語以及自我提及語進(jìn)行檢索并整理制表,并借助統(tǒng)計軟件對各類標(biāo)記語出現(xiàn)的頻率及顯著性進(jìn)行計算。本文旨在解決以下兩個研究問題:(1)中奧英語專業(yè)碩士研究生學(xué)位論文中的...

【文章頁數(shù)】：83 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
Chapter 1 Introduction
    1.1 Background of the Study
    1.2 Purpose and Significance of the Study
    1.3 Structure of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 The Definition of Stance
    2.2 Previous Studies on Stance Markers in Academic Discourse
        2.2.1 Studies on Stance Markers from the Perspective of Evidentiality
        2.2.2 Studies on Stance Markers from the Perspective of Affect
        2.2.3 Studies on Stance Markers from the Perspective of the Stance Framework
        2.2.4 Studies on Stance Markers from the Perspective of Hyland’s Model
        2.2.5 Studies on Stance Markers from the Perspective of the Appraisal Theory
    2.3 Studies on Identity Construction in Academic Discourse
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework
    3.1 An Overview of Hyland’s Model of Academic Interaction
    3.2 The Stance System in Hyland’s Model
        3.2.1 Hedges
        3.2.2 Boosters
        3.2.3 Attitude Markers
        3.2.4 Self-Mention
Chapter Four Methodology
    4.1 Research Questions
    4.2 Research Method
    4.3 Data Collection
    4.4 Data Analysis
Chapter Five Results and Discussion
    5.1 Frequency of Stance Markers in the Corpus
        5.1.1 Frequency of Stance Markers in Different Semantic Categories
        5.1.2 Frequency of Stance Markers in Different Word Categories
    5.2 Major Stance Markers Used in the Corpus
        5.2.1 Modal Verbs
        5.2.2 Verbs
        5.2.3 Adverbs
        5.2.4 Adjectives
        5.2.5 Phrases
    5.3 Identity Construction in the Corpus
    5.4 Similarities and Difference of Stance Markers in the Corpus
Chapter Six Conclusion
    6.1 Major Findings of the Study
    6.2 Implications
    6.3 Limitations of the Study
    6.4 Directions for Further Studies
References
Appendix A Master Theses in CMTL-CHN
Appendix B Master Theses in CMTL-AT
Appendix C Stance Markers Investigated in the Study
Appendix D Stance Markers with Low Frequency in the Corpus
作者簡介及科研成果
Acknowledgements



本文編號：3869192