發(fā)布時間：2021-04-02 03:48

　　1947年,美國人類學家法蘭茲鮑亞士在《夸扣特爾語語法》首次使用“言據(jù)性”一詞,之后言據(jù)性研究在語言學領(lǐng)域逐步受到關(guān)注。言據(jù)性主要指說話人對知識的來源及態(tài)度的說明。言據(jù)性的表現(xiàn)形式主要有形態(tài)證素和詞匯證素。形態(tài)證素主要指動詞的前綴、后綴等,詞匯證素主要指動詞、副詞、形容詞等。近年來,言據(jù)性在學術(shù)語篇的使用特征逐漸成為研究的熱點,學術(shù)語篇的言據(jù)性是說話人對信息來源及可靠性的認知編碼,說話人可以根據(jù)交際意圖使用相應(yīng)的證素來表達自己對所述信息的態(tài)度。這不僅可以幫助讀者了解作者的語篇目的,同時也為讀者接受其觀點提供一定的依據(jù)。通過文獻綜述發(fā)現(xiàn),目前,關(guān)于言據(jù)性的研究多以跨語言對比研究、特定詞類的言據(jù)功能探討、不同語篇類型中的言據(jù)性表述研究等為主,以英語為主要語言的言據(jù)性研究成果相對較少（陳征,2014）,而對于英語專業(yè)碩博士論文與國內(nèi)外學者在英語核心期刊發(fā)表的學術(shù)論文的言據(jù)性對比研究則更少。由于此研究現(xiàn)狀,本文分別從愛思維爾官網(wǎng)和中國知網(wǎng)選取了三個語言學類期刊和三所大學,采用隨機抽樣的原則抽取了2017年到2019年英語專業(yè)碩博士論文和語言學類國內(nèi)外學者的學術(shù)論文共40篇語篇作為本文的研究語料... 

【文章來源】：蘭州交通大學甘肅省

【文章頁數(shù)】：87 頁

【學位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Research Background
    1.2 Objectives of the Current Study
    1.3 Significance of the Current Study
    1.4 Layout of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 The Definition of Evidentiality
        2.1.1 Evidentiality in the Narrow Sense
        2.1.2 Evidentiality in the Broad Sense
        2.1.3 Evidentiality Adopted in the Present Study
    2.2 Evidentiality and Related Notions
        2.2.1 Evidentiality and Modality
        2.2.2 Evidentiality and Subjectivity
    2.3 Related Studies on Evidentiality
        2.3.1 The Typological Perspective
        2.3.2 The Cognitive Perspective
        2.3.3 The Pragmatic Perspective
        2.3.4 The Systemic-functional Perspective
    2.4 Summary
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework
    3.1 Previous Classifications of Evidentiality
        3.1.1 Willett’s Model
        3.1.2 Aikhenvald’s Model
        3.1.3 Chafe’s Model
        3.1.4 Hu Zhuanglin’s Model
    3.2 Classification of Evidentiality in the Current Study
Chapter Four Methodology
    4.1 Research Questions
    4.2 Data Collection
        4.2.1 General Principles
        4.2.2 Selection of Targeted Universities and Journals
        4.2.3 Data Establishment
    4.3 Research Procedure
        4.3.1 Pilot Analysis
        4.3.2 Coding Procedure
        4.3.3 Analytical Procedure
Chapter Five Results and Discussion
    5.1 The Features of the Use of Evidentials
        5.1.1 The Frequency of Evidentials
        5.1.2 Distribution of Evidential Types
    5.2.The Contrastive Analysis of Evidentials
        5.2.1 The Contrastive Analysis of Evidentials in MA and Ph D Theses
        5.2.2 The Contrastive Analysis of Evidentials in English Ph D Theses and ResearchPapers by Domestic Scholars
        5.2.3 The Contrastive Analysis of Evidentials in Research Papers by DomesticScholars and Native Scholars
        5.2.4 The Contrastive Analysis of Evidentials in Student Theses and Research Papers
Chapter Six Conclusion
    6.1 Major Findings of the Research
    6.2 Implications of the Present Study
    6.3 Limitations and Suggestions
Acknowledgements
References
Appendix Ⅰ Evidentials Investigated in the Current Research
Appendix Ⅱ Titles of the Analyzed Academic Discourses
Academic Achievements



本文編號：3114525