“一帶一路”倡議作為中國(guó)全方位改革開(kāi)放的新戰(zhàn)略,自提出以來(lái),就得到了許多國(guó)家的積極響應(yīng)與認(rèn)同。西方國(guó)家對(duì)于“一帶一路”倡議的評(píng)價(jià)褒貶不一,也不乏保持觀望態(tài)度者。美國(guó)作為世界第一強(qiáng)國(guó),給予了我國(guó)“一帶一路”倡議極大的關(guān)注,態(tài)度經(jīng)歷了一系列轉(zhuǎn)變:從一開(kāi)始的不置可否,到不滿開(kāi)始累積,到強(qiáng)烈抵制,再到態(tài)度回暖,繼而又轉(zhuǎn)向質(zhì)疑,這引發(fā)了世界的強(qiáng)烈討論,各類媒體對(duì)此報(bào)道不斷,理解美國(guó)對(duì)“一帶一路”倡議的真實(shí)評(píng)價(jià)變得尤為重要。政治遠(yuǎn)離人民群眾的日常生活,概念隱喻被深化成一種認(rèn)知工具來(lái)引導(dǎo)抽象概念的形成。新聞憑借對(duì)概念隱喻的使用成為了各國(guó)政府反映國(guó)家意識(shí)形態(tài)、表達(dá)政治意圖、引導(dǎo)輿論走向的重要媒介。“一帶一路”的相關(guān)報(bào)道同樣如此。本研究選取了《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》國(guó)際版新聞中62篇重大事件相關(guān)報(bào)道作為語(yǔ)料,基于Lakoff的概念隱喻理論和Charteris-Black的批評(píng)隱喻分析方法,對(duì)語(yǔ)料中的概念隱喻進(jìn)行了歷時(shí)研究。首先,作者通過(guò)細(xì)讀語(yǔ)料,將字面意義與語(yǔ)境發(fā)生沖突、且產(chǎn)生與語(yǔ)境相符的新理解的詞確認(rèn)為隱喻關(guān)鍵詞,并按源域?qū)@些關(guān)鍵詞分類;然后,作者通過(guò)分析隱喻、認(rèn)知和語(yǔ)用因素三者之間的關(guān)系,補(bǔ)充了相應(yīng)目的域,歸... 

【文章來(lái)源】：湖南工業(yè)大學(xué)湖南省

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：123 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Abstract
摘要
Chapter1 Introduction
    1.1 Research background
    1.2 Research purposes and questions
    1.3 Research significance
    1.4 Outline of this thesis
Chapter2 Literature Review
    2.1 Studies on conceptual metaphor
        2.1.1 Studies on conceptual metaphor abroad
        2.1.2 Studies on conceptual metaphor at home
    2.2 Studies on critical metaphor analysis
        2.2.1 Studies on critical metaphor analysis abroad
        2.2.2 Studies on critical metaphor analysis at home
    2.3 Studies on conceptual metaphor in news discourse
        2.3.1 Studies on language and politics
        2.3.2 Studies on conceptual metaphor in news discourse
Chapter3 Methodology
    3.1 Data source and collection
    3.2 Data analysis steps
        3.2.1 Metaphor identification
        3.2.2 Metaphor interpretation
        3.2.3 Metaphor classification
        3.2.4 Metaphor explanation
Chapter4 Neutral concept metaphor about the Belt and Road in The New York Times
    4.1 Identification of neutral conceptual metaphor
    4.2 Interpretation of neutral conceptual metaphor
        4.2.1 Country as a person
            4.2.1.1 The image of China
            4.2.1.2 The image of the United States
        4.2.2 The Belt and Road as a journey
            4.2.2.1 China as a traveller
            4.2.2.2 Participating countries as fellow travellers
        4.2.3 The Belt and Road as a financial transaction
            4.2.3.1 International interaction as business
            4.2.3.2 China as the beneficiary
            4.2.3.2 The United States and other countries as payers
    4.3 Explanation of neutral conceptual metaphor
Chapter5 Negative conceptual metaphor about the Belt and Road in The New York Times
    5.1 Identification of negative conceptual metaphor
    5.2 Interpretation of negative conceptual metaphor
        5.2.1 The Belt and Road as a war
            5.2.1.1 Trade issue as a war
            5.2.1.2 Economic rivals as enemies
            5.2.1.3 Economic supporters as allies
        5.2.2 The Belt and Road as destruction
            5.2.2.1 Destruction of the existing global economy
            5.2.2.2 Destruction of the existing global politics
    5.3 Explanation of negative conceptual metaphor
Chapter6 Positive conceptual metaphor about the Belt and Road in The New York Times
    6.1 Identification of positive conceptual metaphor
    6.2 Interpretation of positive conceptual metaphor
        6.2.1 The Belt and Road as a creation and construction
            6.2.1.1 China as a creator and constructor
            6.2.1.2 The United States as a creator and constructor
            6.2.1.3 Other countries as creators and constructors
        6.2.2 The Belt and Road as an upward action
            6.2.2.1 Upward China
            6.2.2.2 The United States’reaction to upward China
            6.2.2.3 Other countries’reaction to upward China
    6.3 Explanation of positive conceptual metaphor
Chapter7 Conclusion
    7.1 Findings of the study
    7.2 Limitations of the study
Bibliography
AppendixⅠ
AppendixⅡ
AppendixⅢ
AppendixⅣ
AppendixⅤ
攻讀學(xué)位期間主要科研成果
Acknowledgements


【參考文獻(xiàn)】：
期刊論文
[1]氣候外交話語(yǔ)中的隱喻和身份構(gòu)建——以英國(guó)、加拿大、中國(guó)在歷次氣候大會(huì)上的發(fā)言為例[J]. 翁青青.  當(dāng)代亞太. 2013 (05)

碩士論文
[1]批評(píng)隱喻分析視角下《中國(guó)政府工作報(bào)告（2017）》中的隱喻翻譯研究[D]. 谷彩霞.西安外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué) 2018
[2]批評(píng)隱喻視角下特朗普就職演講中的隱喻分析[D]. 尚海靜.遼寧師范大學(xué) 2018
[3]美國(guó)總統(tǒng)特朗普公開(kāi)演講中隱喻的批評(píng)性分析[D]. 張慧.蘇州大學(xué) 2018
[4]漢英政府話語(yǔ)中政治隱喻的認(rèn)知對(duì)比研究[D]. 肖雪.西安外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué) 2016
[5]政治語(yǔ)篇概念隱喻及其意識(shí)形態(tài)對(duì)比分析[D]. 曹月新.東北師范大學(xué) 2004



本文編號(hào)：3002393