【摘要】：與BBC等電視媒體不同,多數(shù)英國報紙在2015年英國首相大選中公開表達(dá)對不同政黨的支持。政治立場不同的媒體其政治修辭策略相異�！短枅蟆返恼涡揶o策略體現(xiàn)為采用"他者"形象建構(gòu)工黨,間接表態(tài)支持保守黨;《鏡報》則有意強化語言的情感意味,發(fā)表評論和鼓動性文章呼吁選民支持工黨。在修辭效果上,《太陽報》略勝一籌。然而,兩份報紙的政治修辭均視為所支持的政黨爭取領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)合法性作為目標(biāo),本質(zhì)上都是"政客修辭"。
[Abstract]:Unlike television media such as BBC, most British newspapers publicly expressed their support for different political parties in the 2015 election. The political rhetoric strategies of the media with different political positions are different. The political rhetoric strategies of the Sun are embodied in the use of the "other" image to construct the Labour Party and indirectly express their support for the Conservative Party, while the Mirror intends to strengthen the emotional meaning of the language. Published comments and agitating articles calling on voters to support Labour. In rhetorical effect, the Sun is a bit better. However, the political rhetoric of the two newspapers is regarded as the political party's aim for the legitimacy of leadership, which is essentially "politician's rhetoric".
【作者單位】： 中國傳媒大學(xué)新聞傳播學(xué)部;
【分類號】：H315;G212

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 ;米歇爾致信電視臺要提前看《唐頓莊園》[J];高中生學(xué)習(xí)(高二版);2013年01期

，

本文編號：2239339