元認知策略與高中生英語寫作成績之間的相關性研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-07-14 17:43
【摘要】：隨著以學習者為中心理念的發(fā)展,英語學習策略受到了越來越多的關注。有效的學習策略可以提高學習的質量和效率,培養(yǎng)學生的自主學習能力,解釋和預測學生的學習表現(呂德文,馬瑞雪2007)。作為學習策略的重要組成部分,元認知策略受到學者的廣泛關注。1976年,美國心理學家J.H.Flavell首先提出了元認知一詞。他認為元認知是學習者關于自己認知過程,結果及相關活動的認知。自此,越來越多的學者開始運用相關理論指導外語教學與研究。國內相關研究工作自上世紀90年代起開始興起,而元認知策略在英語寫作教學方面的研究較其他領域相對匱乏,已有研究較少涉及高中英語寫作教學。基于此,本文將對元認知策略與高中生英語寫作成績之間的相關性進行研究。本文主要調查了黑龍江省牡丹江市第二中學高二年級學生在英語寫作中使用元認知策略的情況,以及策略的使用情況與寫作成功者和不成功者等變量之間的關系。本次調查對象具有較強的客觀性及主觀合作意愿,從一定程度上保證了研究的有效度和可信度。此次調查采用路文軍編制的問卷作為調查牡二中學生在英語寫作中使用元認知策略的工具,以高二上學期期中考試英語寫作成績作為衡量學生寫作水平的標準,并輔以訪談等手段進行。后將所得數據輸入計算機,用SPSS19.0數據分析軟件對其進行處理,利用描述性統(tǒng)計分析高二學生在英語寫作中使用元認知策略的總體情況,同時利用T檢驗分析高分組和低分組學生之間在元認知策略使用上的不同以驗證其是否具有統(tǒng)計學意義,最后利用皮爾遜相關系數進行元認知策略與寫作成績之間相關關系的研究。研究結果表明:牡丹江二中高二學生英語寫作中元認知策略使用頻率處于中級水平;四類策略分類中,選擇注意策略使用率居于首位,而自我評價策略使用率最低。通過比較高低分組學生元認知策略使用情況得知,高分組學生元認知策略使用平均數(3.36)高于低分組(2.89),說明高分組學生的策略使用意識較低分組更為積極,同時T檢驗結果顯示兩組學生策略使用上的差異存在統(tǒng)計學意義;皮爾遜系數顯示元認知策略在英語寫作中的使用頻率與其英語寫作水平成正相關的關系;與其他策略相比較,自我監(jiān)控策略與寫作成績相關性最大,即寫作成績受其影響最大,評價策略與其相關性最小;即研究結果表明,培養(yǎng)學生的元認知策略意識,尤其是發(fā)揮自我監(jiān)控策略的作用有助于提高學生的寫作能力。
[Abstract]:With the development of learner-centered concept, English learning strategies have received more and more attention. Effective learning strategies can improve the quality and efficiency of learning, cultivate students' autonomous learning ability, explain and predict students' learning performance (Lu Devon, Ma Ruixue 2007). As an important part of learning strategies, metacognitive strategies have attracted extensive attention of scholars. In 1976, J. H. Flavell, an American psychologist, first proposed the word metacognition. He believes metacognition is learners' cognition about their own cognitive processes, outcomes and related activities. Since then, more and more scholars have begun to use relevant theories to guide foreign language teaching and research. Since the beginning of the 1990s in China, the research on metacognitive strategies in English writing teaching has been relatively scarce, and there has been less research on English writing teaching in senior high schools. Based on this, this paper will study the correlation between metacognitive strategies and high school students' English writing scores. This paper investigates the use of metacognitive strategies in English writing among the sophomores in Mudanjiang No. 2 Middle School in Heilongjiang Province, and the relationship between the use of strategies and variables such as successful and unsuccessful writing. The object of this investigation has strong objectivity and subjective willingness to cooperate, which to some extent ensures the validity and credibility of the research. The questionnaire compiled by Lu Wenjun was used as a tool for the students to use metacognitive strategies in their English writing. The scores of English writing in the second semester of senior middle school were taken as the standard to measure the students' writing level. And with interviews and other means. The data was then input into the computer and processed with SPSS 19.0 data analysis software. The use of descriptive statistics was used to analyze the overall use of metacognitive strategies in senior two students' English writing. At the same time, T-test was used to analyze the differences in the use of metacognitive strategies between the high-score and low-group students to verify whether they had statistical significance. Finally, Pearson correlation coefficient is used to study the correlation between metacognitive strategies and writing achievement. The results show that the use frequency of metacognitive strategies in Mudanjiang Middle School 2 is at the intermediate level, and the utilization rate of selective attention strategies is the first among the four categories of strategies, while the use rate of self-evaluation strategies is the lowest. By comparing the use of metacognitive strategies among high and low group students, it was found that the average of metacognitive strategies used in high score group (3.36) was higher than that in low score group (2.89), which indicated that high score students' awareness of using strategies was more positive than that of low score group. At the same time, the results of T test show that there are significant differences in the use of strategies between the two groups. Pearson coefficient shows that the frequency of using metacognitive strategies in English writing is positively related to their English writing proficiency, and is compared with other strategies. Self-monitoring strategy has the greatest correlation with writing achievement, that is, writing achievement is most affected, evaluation strategy is the least relevant, that is to say, the research results show that students' metacognitive strategy awareness is cultivated. In particular, the role of self-monitoring strategies can help to improve students' writing ability.
【學位授予單位】：牡丹江師范學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G633.41
本文編號：2122467
[Abstract]:With the development of learner-centered concept, English learning strategies have received more and more attention. Effective learning strategies can improve the quality and efficiency of learning, cultivate students' autonomous learning ability, explain and predict students' learning performance (Lu Devon, Ma Ruixue 2007). As an important part of learning strategies, metacognitive strategies have attracted extensive attention of scholars. In 1976, J. H. Flavell, an American psychologist, first proposed the word metacognition. He believes metacognition is learners' cognition about their own cognitive processes, outcomes and related activities. Since then, more and more scholars have begun to use relevant theories to guide foreign language teaching and research. Since the beginning of the 1990s in China, the research on metacognitive strategies in English writing teaching has been relatively scarce, and there has been less research on English writing teaching in senior high schools. Based on this, this paper will study the correlation between metacognitive strategies and high school students' English writing scores. This paper investigates the use of metacognitive strategies in English writing among the sophomores in Mudanjiang No. 2 Middle School in Heilongjiang Province, and the relationship between the use of strategies and variables such as successful and unsuccessful writing. The object of this investigation has strong objectivity and subjective willingness to cooperate, which to some extent ensures the validity and credibility of the research. The questionnaire compiled by Lu Wenjun was used as a tool for the students to use metacognitive strategies in their English writing. The scores of English writing in the second semester of senior middle school were taken as the standard to measure the students' writing level. And with interviews and other means. The data was then input into the computer and processed with SPSS 19.0 data analysis software. The use of descriptive statistics was used to analyze the overall use of metacognitive strategies in senior two students' English writing. At the same time, T-test was used to analyze the differences in the use of metacognitive strategies between the high-score and low-group students to verify whether they had statistical significance. Finally, Pearson correlation coefficient is used to study the correlation between metacognitive strategies and writing achievement. The results show that the use frequency of metacognitive strategies in Mudanjiang Middle School 2 is at the intermediate level, and the utilization rate of selective attention strategies is the first among the four categories of strategies, while the use rate of self-evaluation strategies is the lowest. By comparing the use of metacognitive strategies among high and low group students, it was found that the average of metacognitive strategies used in high score group (3.36) was higher than that in low score group (2.89), which indicated that high score students' awareness of using strategies was more positive than that of low score group. At the same time, the results of T test show that there are significant differences in the use of strategies between the two groups. Pearson coefficient shows that the frequency of using metacognitive strategies in English writing is positively related to their English writing proficiency, and is compared with other strategies. Self-monitoring strategy has the greatest correlation with writing achievement, that is, writing achievement is most affected, evaluation strategy is the least relevant, that is to say, the research results show that students' metacognitive strategy awareness is cultivated. In particular, the role of self-monitoring strategies can help to improve students' writing ability.
【學位授予單位】：牡丹江師范學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G633.41
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 須利華;;英語寫作教學中學生元認知策略意識的培養(yǎng)[J];教育理論與實踐;2016年33期
2 齊聰;陳旭遠;;中國英語學習策略培訓研究十年述評(2003-2012)——基于國內17種外語類核心期刊論文的統(tǒng)計與分析[J];延邊大學學報(社會科學版);2014年02期
3 李紹芳;;元認知訓練對不同英語水平者寫作成績的影響——一項基于分級教學的研究[J];雞西大學學報;2013年06期
4 趙凌志;;元認知策略與英語專業(yè)學生寫作成績關系研究[J];現代教育科學;2012年05期
5 劉文宇;高榮濤;;元認知策略培訓對中國學生英語寫作影響的元分析研究[J];外語教學;2011年02期
6 黃美;;元認知策略培訓與大學英語寫作的關系[J];廣西民族大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2008年03期
7 韓春暉;;元認知策略與英語寫作教學[J];齊齊哈爾大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2007年03期
8 呂德文;馬瑞雪;;英語專業(yè)學生元認知策略發(fā)展研究[J];外語界;2007年02期
9 路文軍;;元認知策略與英語寫作的關系[J];外語與外語教學;2006年09期
10 吳紅云;;大學英語寫作中元認知體驗現象實證研究[J];外語與外語教學;2006年03期
，本文編號：2122467
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/waiyulunwen/yingyulunwen/2122467.html
最近更新
教材專著
