本文選題：小學生 + 英語學習策略��； 參考：《山西師范大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：越來越多的研究表明,在影響外語學習的眾多因素當中學習策略是影響其成敗的重要因素,因此從20世紀70年代起,人們的研究重點也從研究教師的教轉向研究學生的學�！队⒄Z新課程標準》明確要求教師要加強對學生英語學習策略的指導,并對各個學段英語學習策略的目標作了具體要求。針對小學生而言,新課標中的二級目標規(guī)定了十一條具體的英語學習策略。通過閱讀相關文獻,作者發(fā)現(xiàn)英語學習策略的研究對象大多以大學生和高中生為主,研究小學生的甚少。針對以往研究的不足,本研究旨在了解以下問題:(1)實驗后學生英語學習策略使用意識是否提高或改善?(2)英語學習策略培訓對不同水平的學生有怎樣的影響?(3)英語學習策略培訓對學生英語成績產(chǎn)生什么影響?作者選取明德小學六年級的兩個班進行實驗。一個班進行學習策略培訓另一班像往常一樣教學。整個實驗持續(xù)一個學期。為了得到研究問題的詳細的數(shù)據(jù),本文使用到調查問卷并得出以下結論:(1)經(jīng)過一個學期的英語學習策略培訓,實驗班的策略使用意識產(chǎn)生顯著差異并且由原來的“有時使用該策略”上升到“經(jīng)常使用該策略”,而控制班沒有變化。四個策略從高到低的依次是控制策略、資源策略、認知策略和交際策略。四個策略中,除交際策略處于“有時使用該策略”外,其余三個策略都處于“經(jīng)常使用該策略”。認知策略、交際策略和資源策略的使用情況實驗前后有顯著差異,而控制策略沒有變化。(2)在四種策略的使用上,優(yōu)秀生培訓前后沒有顯著差異,策略的使用頻率在實驗前后都處于“經(jīng)常使用該策略”。中等生的學習策略意識具有顯著差異在培訓后。就四種策略而言,認知策略、交際策略和資源策略有顯著差異而控制策略沒有產(chǎn)生差異。中等生的策略使用頻率也上升到“經(jīng)常使用該策略”。具體地說,認知策略、控制策略和資源策略都上升到“經(jīng)常使用該策略”的范圍而交際策略仍然處于“有時使用該策略”。差生總的策略使用意識在培訓后沒有差異。但是在四種策略中,認知策略在培訓后產(chǎn)生顯著差異。差生的策略使用頻率處于“有時使用該策略”。通過組間比較,我們發(fā)現(xiàn)優(yōu)秀生的策略使用在0.05水平上和差生有顯著差異。(3)經(jīng)過一個學期的英語學習策略培訓,學生的英語成績提高并且顯著高于控制班。
[Abstract]:More and more studies show that learning strategy is an important factor influencing the success of foreign language learning. The emphasis of the study has also shifted from the teaching of teachers to the study of students' learning. The New English Curriculum Standard clearly requires teachers to strengthen the guidance of students' English learning strategies, and makes specific requirements for the objectives of English learning strategies in each learning paragraph. For primary school students, the two-level goals in the new curriculum set out 11 specific English learning strategies. By reading the relevant literature, the author finds that most of the research subjects of English learning strategies are college students and high school students, and few of them study pupils. In view of the shortcomings of previous studies, The purpose of this study is to find out the following questions: (1) whether students' awareness of using English learning strategies has been raised or improved after the experiment? (2) how English learning strategy training affects students at different levels; (3) how English learning strategy training affects students' English learning What is the impact of language achievement? The author selected two classes in the sixth grade of Mingde Primary School to carry out the experiment. One class conducts learning strategy training and the other class teaches as usual. The whole experiment lasted one semester. In order to obtain the detailed data of the research questions, this paper uses the questionnaire and draws the following conclusion: 1) after one semester of English learning strategy training, The awareness of strategy use in the experimental class was significantly different and increased from "sometimes using the strategy" to "using the strategy frequently", while the control class did not change. The four strategies from high to low are control strategy, resource strategy, cognitive strategy and communication strategy. Of the four strategies, the other three are "frequently used" except that the communication strategy is "sometimes used". There were significant differences in the use of cognitive strategy, communication strategy and resource strategy before and after the experiment, but there was no significant difference in the use of the four strategies before and after training. The frequency of use of the policy is "often used" before and after the experiment. There are significant differences in learning strategy awareness among secondary students after training. As far as the four strategies are concerned, there are significant differences in cognitive strategies, communication strategies and resource strategies, but there are no differences in control strategies. The frequency of strategy use by secondary students has also risen to "use this strategy frequently." Specifically, cognitive strategy, control strategy and resource strategy all rise to the range of "using this strategy frequently" while communication strategy is still "sometimes used". There was no difference in the overall awareness of strategy use among poor students after training. But among the four strategies, cognitive strategies have significant differences after training. The poor student's policy is used frequently in "sometimes use this policy." Through comparison among groups, we find that the strategy use of excellent students is significantly different from that of poor students at the level of 0.05) after one semester of English learning strategy training, the students' English scores are improved and significantly higher than those of the control class.
【學位授予單位】：山西師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G623.31

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 劉電芝;嚴慧一;樊楓;劉禮艷;牛智慧;;小學英語學習策略掌握現(xiàn)狀與發(fā)展特點——以蘇南地區(qū)為例[J];課程·教材·教法;2013年05期

2 鄭家青;陳巍;;小學生英語學習策略與學習成績的相關研究[J];英語教師;2009年04期

3 湯紅娟;;培養(yǎng)兒童英語學習策略的重心和途徑[J];基礎教育外語教學研究;2006年10期

4 夏侯富生;呂菲;;小學生英語學習策略年級差異研究[J];教育研究與實驗;2006年05期

5 張殿玉;英語學習策略與自主學習[J];外語教學;2005年01期

6 文秋芳,王立非;影響外語學習策略系統(tǒng)運行的各種因素評述[J];外語與外語教學;2004年09期

7 王篤勤;大學英語自主學習能力的培養(yǎng)[J];外語界;2002年05期

8 華維芬;外語學習者策略訓練芻議[J];外語界;2002年03期

9 王立非;;第二語言學習策略研究:問題與對策[J];國外外語教學;2001年04期

10 史耀芳;二十世紀國內外學習策略研究概述[J];心理科學;2001年05期

相關碩士學位論文 前5條

1 嚴慧一;小學生英語學習策略、策略意識、策略情感發(fā)展特點及相互關系[D];蘇州大學;2013年

2 孫沛;小學生英語詞匯學習策略研究[D];河北大學;2010年

3 鄭湘寧;小學六年級學生英語詞匯學習策略研究[D];湖南師范大學;2008年

4 李冬云;小學生英語學習策略研究[D];首都師范大學;2008年

5 李榮娟;中學生英語學習策略使用狀況調查研究[D];首都師范大學;2005年

，

本文編號：1824220