本文選題：言據(jù)性 + 英漢學術(shù)書評�。� 參考：《山西大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：本篇論文對比研究了英漢學術(shù)書評中的言據(jù)性,作者旨在探索英漢書評語篇中言據(jù)性的相同點與不同點。近年來言據(jù)性這一語言現(xiàn)象已經(jīng)成為一個熱門研究課題。雖然之前許多學者從不同的角度對言據(jù)性進行研究并且取得了不小的成就,然而對言據(jù)性很多方面的研究并不完善。前人對言據(jù)性的研究主要呈現(xiàn)出以下幾個特征:首先,在對言據(jù)性的早期研究中,許多學者致力于對一些高度曲折變化的語言中據(jù)素的語法描寫上,然而這些研究忽略了語言的形式和語境;其次,之后學者們將研究重點轉(zhuǎn)移到了詞匯句法層面,近年來更多的是對言據(jù)性在學術(shù)語篇中的研究,但是書評這一語類結(jié)構(gòu)中言據(jù)性的研究仍然沒有得到足夠的關(guān)注;再次,對學術(shù)書評中言據(jù)性研究的文獻回顧表明對言據(jù)性進行跨語言的對比研究很少,對學術(shù)書評這一語類中言據(jù)性的研究則更少。鑒于上文提到的之前研究的特點與不足,本篇論文將基于語料庫,對英漢語言學書評中的言據(jù)性進行對比研究。根據(jù)對語料的統(tǒng)計結(jié)果,本論文描述了英漢書評中言據(jù)性的異同點,并且討論了可能對據(jù)素選擇產(chǎn)生影響的因素。本篇論文主要包括以下幾個部分。首先,在本篇論文中我們將言據(jù)性看成一個語義范疇,并且由不同的據(jù)素來實現(xiàn)言據(jù)性�；跁u的語類特點以及其他學者對據(jù)素的分類,本篇論文呈現(xiàn)了言據(jù)性的分類以及每一種據(jù)素的詞匯語法實現(xiàn)形式。從語料中我們可以發(fā)現(xiàn)在英漢書評中每一種據(jù)素都有很多種詞匯語法實現(xiàn)形式。其次,統(tǒng)計結(jié)果表明英語書評和漢語書評中都有大量的據(jù)素。英語書評中據(jù)素出現(xiàn)的頻率明顯高于漢語書評。這表明與漢語書評作者相比,英語書評作者更加關(guān)注據(jù)素的選擇。經(jīng)過對比研究,我們發(fā)現(xiàn)英語書評中據(jù)素的實現(xiàn)形式遠比漢語豐富,并且在英漢書評中轉(zhuǎn)述據(jù)素和推斷據(jù)素的頻率高于感官據(jù)素和信念據(jù)素,出現(xiàn)頻率最高的是轉(zhuǎn)述據(jù)素。第三,言據(jù)性的功能之一是表明信息來源,本研究也探討了英漢學術(shù)書評中轉(zhuǎn)述據(jù)素的信息來源。統(tǒng)計結(jié)果表明英漢書評作者都傾向于指出信息的具體來源。在自我轉(zhuǎn)述據(jù)素和他人轉(zhuǎn)述據(jù)素中,他人轉(zhuǎn)述據(jù)素所占比重最大。本篇論文對學術(shù)書評中言據(jù)性的研究有重要的意義。本研究提供了學術(shù)書評中言據(jù)性的分類和據(jù)素的詞匯語法實現(xiàn)形式,其有助于增強其他研究者對言據(jù)性的理解。本文也豐富了學術(shù)語篇中言據(jù)性的研究。英漢書評中言據(jù)性的相同點表明言據(jù)性這一語言現(xiàn)象的普遍性,不同點表明不同的文化背景與寫作習慣可能會影響作者對據(jù)素的選擇。
[Abstract]:This thesis makes a contrastive study of the textual nature of English and Chinese academic book reviews. The author aims to explore the similarities and differences between English and Chinese book review discourses.In recent years, the phenomenon of verbal representation has become a hot research topic.Although many scholars have made a great deal of achievements in the research from different angles, many researches on verbal evidences are not perfect.The previous studies on textual nature have shown the following characteristics: first of all, in the early study of verbal positivity, many scholars have devoted themselves to the grammatical description of primordial elements in some highly tortuous languages.However, these studies have neglected the form and context of language. Secondly, scholars have shifted their focus to the lexical and syntactic level, and in recent years, they have focused more on the study of verbality in academic discourse.However, the study of textual evidence in the genre structure of book review is still not paid enough attention. Thirdly, the literature review of the textual research in academic book review shows that there are few cross-linguistic contrastive studies on textual criticism.There is less research on the textual nature of academic book review.In view of the characteristics and shortcomings of the previous studies mentioned above, this thesis will make a comparative study of the evidential nature of book reviews in English and Chinese linguistics based on the corpus.Based on the statistical results of the corpus, this paper describes the similarities and differences between English and Chinese book reviews, and discusses the factors that may influence the selection of evidential elements.This paper mainly includes the following parts.First of all, in this paper, we regard verbal evidence as a semantic category, and realize it by different evidences.Based on the genre characteristics of book reviews and the classification of evidential elements by other scholars, this thesis presents the categorization of textual and lexical grammatical implementation of each element.From the corpus, we can find that there are many kinds of lexical and grammatical realization forms in English and Chinese book reviews.Secondly, the statistical results show that there are a lot of evidences in both English book review and Chinese book review.The frequency of evidence in English book review is obviously higher than that in Chinese book review.This shows that English book reviewers pay more attention to the choice of evidence than Chinese book reviewers.Through a comparative study, we find that the forms of materialization in English book reviews are much richer than those in Chinese, and the frequency of paraphrase elements and inferential evidences in English and Chinese book reviews is higher than that in sensory elements and belief evidences, and the highest frequency is in the paraphrase elements.Thirdly, one of its functions is to indicate the source of information. The present study also explores the sources of information in English and Chinese academic book reviews.The statistical results show that both English and Chinese book reviewers tend to point out the specific sources of information.Among self-reporting elements and others' reporting evidences, the proportion of others' reporting evidences is the largest.This paper is of great significance to the study of textual evidence in academic book reviews.This study provides the categorization of evidentiality and the lexical grammatical realization of morpheme in academic book reviews, which helps to enhance other researchers' understanding of positivity.This paper also enriches the study of textual evidence in academic discourse.The similarities between Chinese and English book reviews indicate the universality of the linguistic phenomenon, and the differences indicate that different cultural backgrounds and writing habits may affect the author's choice of evidentiary elements.
【學位授予單位】：山西大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：H315

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳征;;英漢言據(jù)性系統(tǒng)的對比研究[J];語文學刊;2015年08期

2 楊林秀;;英文學術(shù)論文中的作者身份構(gòu)建:言據(jù)性視角[J];外語教學;2015年02期

3 崔林;成曉光;;學術(shù)論文中動詞性據(jù)素使用情況的英漢對比研究[J];大連理工大學學報(社會科學版);2014年02期

4 陳征;;基于言據(jù)性的語篇可信性語用分析[J];當代外語研究;2014年04期

5 崔林;成曉光;;言據(jù)性動因的多維理論[J];外國問題研究;2014年01期

6 陳劍虹;;英漢廣告語篇言據(jù)性類型學研究[J];語文學刊(外語教育教學);2013年11期

7 楊林秀;;國內(nèi)言據(jù)性研究:現(xiàn)狀與展望[J];山西大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2013年06期

8 王國鳳;龐繼賢;;語篇的社會認知研究框架——以新聞語篇的言據(jù)性分析為例[J];外語與外語教學;2013年01期

9 房紅梅;方偉琴;;言據(jù)性的人際功能闡析[J];蘇州教育學院學報;2012年03期

10 林馥嫌;;淺析英語新聞中據(jù)素的語用價值[J];福建醫(yī)科大學學報(社會科學版);2011年03期

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前1條

1 陳征;基于主觀性和交互主觀性連續(xù)統(tǒng)的語篇言據(jù)性分析[D];上海外國語大學;2014年

，

本文編號：1738592