中國學(xué)者英語經(jīng)濟類語篇中的學(xué)術(shù)身份研究
本文選題:學(xué)術(shù)身份 切入點:英語經(jīng)濟類語篇 出處:《山東大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文
【摘要】:近年來,作者身份的構(gòu)建問題已受到越來越多的學(xué)者關(guān)注。研究者們普遍認識到,學(xué)術(shù)語篇的作者不僅僅局限于客觀地陳述事實及其研究發(fā)現(xiàn),更重要的是會運用各種修辭策略,并以此來積極塑造其觀點的可信性和權(quán)威性,進而樹立學(xué)術(shù)作者的權(quán)威?v觀以往的研究,有很多是通過對比研究來探討不同學(xué)科和不同文化對學(xué)術(shù)身份構(gòu)建的影響,但是其中對經(jīng)濟類語篇的研究卻很少。為探討中文母語經(jīng)濟學(xué)者如何在經(jīng)濟類語篇中構(gòu)建自己的學(xué)術(shù)身份,筆者從西文全文經(jīng)濟語料庫的五本經(jīng)濟類期刊中收集了 100篇由中國大陸高校學(xué)者創(chuàng)作的經(jīng)濟類研究文獻,并著重從以下三個方面展開研究,依次為專家的身份類型、專家身份的表達方式以及專家如何在經(jīng)濟語篇中實現(xiàn)與其他聲音的互動。首先,在專家的身份類型方面,根據(jù)前人研究,筆者將專家身份類型分為六個方面,并通過UAM統(tǒng)計工具對語篇中出現(xiàn)的第一人稱代詞進行標(biāo)注。相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)顯示,在經(jīng)濟類語篇中,學(xué)者更傾向使用第一人稱復(fù)數(shù)形式塑造自己作為"研究者"的身份。其次,在筆者采用的三種顯隱性程度不同的表達方式中,結(jié)果顯示第一人稱代詞的使用率最高,這表明學(xué)者在經(jīng)濟類語篇中并不避諱表現(xiàn)自己的學(xué)術(shù)身份。不同的是,在發(fā)表評論或陳述研究發(fā)現(xiàn)時,學(xué)者更傾向于使用隱性身份表達方式以此突出自己的研究結(jié)果及研究發(fā)現(xiàn)的客觀性。最后,為探討經(jīng)濟類語篇中的聲音互動機制,筆者采用MartinWhite(2005)的介入系統(tǒng)作為理論框架,并對語料中的不同的聲音進行了標(biāo)注。通過研究發(fā)現(xiàn),收縮性資源的比重稍高于擴張性資源,并且在各類資源中,使用數(shù)量最多的是擴張性的"包含"資源,其次是收縮性的"反對"和"否認"資源。綜上所知,在經(jīng)濟類語篇中,中國大陸學(xué)者能較好地平衡學(xué)術(shù)權(quán)威身份和學(xué)術(shù)成員身份二者間的關(guān)系。本文通過研究中國大陸高校學(xué)者如何在經(jīng)濟類語篇中從身份類型、身份表達方式以及聲音互動機制三方面構(gòu)建自己的學(xué)術(shù)身份,可以為初步進入學(xué)術(shù)領(lǐng)域的研究者提供很大幫助。因此,在學(xué)術(shù)寫作中,我們應(yīng)該注意綜合考慮以上三方面,并通過使用多種不同的修辭策略來積極構(gòu)建自己的學(xué)術(shù)身份。此外,本文還通過研究證實了學(xué)科及文化二因素確實會對學(xué)術(shù)語篇寫作產(chǎn)生一定的影響。然而本研究還存在諸多不足之處。比如在研究過程中,筆者沒有對第一人稱代詞we細分為inclusive we和exclusive we進行區(qū)分研究;再者沒有對文獻不同部分的介入資源的使用情況進行分類統(tǒng)計,這在一定程度上影響了研究結(jié)果的精確性等等,因此本研究尚有待進一步的改進,以幫助我們更好地研究中國大陸學(xué)者如何在經(jīng)濟類語篇中塑造自己的學(xué)術(shù)身份。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the construction of author identity has been paid more and more attention by scholars.Researchers generally recognize that the authors of academic discourse are not limited to objectively stating the facts and their findings. More importantly, they use various rhetorical strategies to actively shape the credibility and authority of their opinions.And then establish the authority of academic writers.Throughout the past studies, there are many comparative studies to explore the impact of different disciplines and cultures on the construction of academic identity, but there is little research on economic discourse.In order to explore how Chinese native language economists construct their academic identity in economic discourse, the author collected 100 articles of economic research literature from five economic journals in the full text economic corpus of Western language, which were created by scholars of universities and colleges in mainland China.It focuses on the following three aspects: the type of identity of the expert, the expression of the identity of the expert and how the expert interacts with other voices in economic discourse.First of all, in terms of the type of identity of experts, according to previous studies, the author divides the type of expert identity into six aspects, and uses the UAM statistical tool to annotate the first person pronouns in discourse.Relevant data show that in economic discourse, scholars tend to use the plural form of the first person to shape their identity as "researchers".Secondly, the results show that the usage of first person pronouns is the highest, which indicates that scholars are not shy to express their academic identity in economic discourse.The difference is that when commenting or presenting the findings, scholars tend to use the implicit expression of identity to highlight their findings and the objectivity of the findings.Finally, in order to explore the mechanism of sound interaction in economic discourse, the author uses Martin Whiteberg's intervention system as the theoretical framework and annotates different sounds in the corpus.It is found that the proportion of contractile resources is slightly higher than that of expansionary resources, and among all kinds of resources, the most used resources are expansionary "inclusive" resources, followed by contractionary "opposition" and "denial" resources.To sum up, in economic discourse, scholars from mainland China can balance the relationship between academic authority and academic membership.This paper studies how university scholars in mainland China construct their academic identity in economic discourse from three aspects: identity type, identity expression mode and sound interaction mechanism.It can be of great help to the researchers who enter the academic field.Therefore, in academic writing, we should pay attention to the above three aspects and actively construct our academic identity by using a variety of rhetorical strategies.In addition, the study also proves that the two factors of discipline and culture do have a certain impact on academic discourse writing.However, there are still many deficiencies in this study.For example, in the course of the study, the author has not classified the first personal pronoun we into inclusive we and exclusive we, and has not classified the use of different parts of the literature on the use of intervening resources.To some extent, this study will affect the accuracy of the research results, so this study needs further improvement in order to help us better study how Chinese mainland scholars shape their academic identity in economic discourse.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:H315
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 孫莉;;中國碩士學(xué)位論文英文摘要的語用身份建構(gòu)研究[J];外語與外語教學(xué);2015年05期
2 杜海;;漢語言據(jù)性的評價分析[J];外語學(xué)刊;2015年05期
3 楊欣然;;二語學(xué)術(shù)寫作中的自我指稱與作者身份建構(gòu)[J];外語與外語教學(xué);2015年04期
4 唐芳;許明武;;英語寫作者身份研究:回顧與展望[J];外語界;2015年03期
5 劉永兵;周惠;;二語學(xué)術(shù)寫作中引述句的立場研究[J];Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics;2014年04期
6 陳新仁;;語用學(xué)視角下的身份研究——關(guān)鍵問題與主要路徑[J];現(xiàn)代外語;2014年05期
7 張敬源;賈培培;;新聞?wù)Z篇中投射模式的研究[J];現(xiàn)代外語;2014年02期
8 李娜;李忠慶;;學(xué)術(shù)文章中的“寫作者聲音”——基于語料庫的跨學(xué)科和語言的對比研究[J];解放軍外國語學(xué)院學(xué)報;2013年04期
9 鄧鸝鳴;;二語論文討論與結(jié)語章節(jié)寫作中學(xué)術(shù)身份的構(gòu)建:中國社科博士生個案研究(英文)[J];Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics;2012年03期
10 岳穎;;學(xué)術(shù)語篇的介入資源與人際意義構(gòu)建——基于學(xué)習(xí)者語篇的個案研究[J];當(dāng)代外語研究;2011年07期
,本文編號:1727132
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/waiyulunwen/yingyulunwen/1727132.html