本文選題：專業(yè)信息素養(yǎng)　切入點(diǎn)：批判性思維　出處：《復(fù)旦教育論壇》2017年04期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：以批判教育和社會(huì)文化學(xué)習(xí)理論為理論基礎(chǔ),提出了以批判性學(xué)術(shù)素養(yǎng)為核心培養(yǎng)目標(biāo),同時(shí)培養(yǎng)英語語言能力、專業(yè)信息素養(yǎng)和批判性思維能力的英語課程框架,并在汕頭大學(xué)醫(yī)學(xué)院一批醫(yī)學(xué)生(N=195)中進(jìn)行為期一年半的實(shí)證研究。研究采用前后測(cè)和個(gè)案研究法,通過能力自測(cè)量表、多維能力評(píng)分量表和訪談等方法獲取數(shù)據(jù)。結(jié)果顯示該課程模式能有效培養(yǎng)學(xué)生的批判性學(xué)術(shù)素養(yǎng),學(xué)生的信息管理能力和批判性思維能力有顯著提高,大學(xué)英語四級(jí)考試成績優(yōu)于70%的常模人群。研究同時(shí)顯示批判性學(xué)術(shù)素養(yǎng)的多元能力在英語學(xué)習(xí)的過程中交互影響、互相促進(jìn),但課程在提升學(xué)生深層能力方面仍有待改善。
[Abstract]:Based on the theory of critical education and sociocultural learning, this paper puts forward the framework of English curriculum, which takes critical academic literacy as the core goal, and develops English language ability, professional information literacy and critical thinking ability at the same time. An empirical study was carried out in a group of medical students of Shantou University Medical College for a period of one and a half years. The results showed that the curriculum model could effectively cultivate students' critical academic literacy, and the students' ability of information management and critical thinking could be improved significantly. The study also shows that the multiple abilities of critical academic literacy interact and promote each other in the process of English learning, but the curriculum still needs to be improved in terms of improving students' deep competence.
【作者單位】： 汕頭大學(xué)醫(yī)學(xué)院;
【基金】：廣東省教育教學(xué)成果獎(jiǎng)(高等教育)培育項(xiàng)目“人文為本,專業(yè)領(lǐng)引——大學(xué)通用英語向?qū)W術(shù)英語漸變轉(zhuǎn)型的課程發(fā)展研究”(粵教高函[2015]72號(hào),項(xiàng)目序號(hào)439) 教育部高等醫(yī)學(xué)教育臨床教學(xué)研究課題“以大學(xué)英語人文課程為依托培養(yǎng)醫(yī)學(xué)職業(yè)素養(yǎng)的探索和研究”(Edu-CR-2016-8-1)
【分類號(hào)】：H319
，

本文編號(hào)：1566300