學(xué)生寫作發(fā)展離不開(kāi)修改。在計(jì)算機(jī)輔助學(xué)習(xí)時(shí)代,修改越來(lái)越成為自我調(diào)節(jié)性寫作活動(dòng)。學(xué)生可以通過(guò)目標(biāo)設(shè)定的認(rèn)知策略或同學(xué)互評(píng)的社會(huì)策略調(diào)節(jié)修改行為。前期研究或植根于個(gè)人認(rèn)知立場(chǎng),或植根于社會(huì)認(rèn)知立場(chǎng),僅研究寫作目標(biāo)或同學(xué)互評(píng)各自對(duì)寫作修改的影響,忽略了寫作自我調(diào)節(jié)的社會(huì)認(rèn)知視角下,修改是寫作目標(biāo)驅(qū)動(dòng)和同學(xué)互評(píng)共同作用的結(jié)果。本研究基于社會(huì)認(rèn)知視角下的寫作自我調(diào)節(jié)理論,結(jié)合了以往研究的兩條主線,剖析寫作目標(biāo)和同學(xué)互評(píng)對(duì)寫作自我調(diào)節(jié)性修改的協(xié)同作用,以便了解如何進(jìn)一步促進(jìn)寫作修改。本文主要研究三個(gè)問(wèn)題:在網(wǎng)上寫作學(xué)習(xí)情境中,學(xué)生進(jìn)行了哪些自我調(diào)節(jié)性修改,效果如何?目標(biāo)設(shè)定和同學(xué)互評(píng)這兩種社會(huì)認(rèn)知策略有何具體特征?自我調(diào)節(jié)性修改在質(zhì)與量上如何與寫作目標(biāo)和同學(xué)互評(píng)相關(guān)?在研究設(shè)計(jì)上,本研究首次提取學(xué)生自發(fā)生成的寫作目標(biāo),用于分析修改與個(gè)人目標(biāo)調(diào)節(jié)的共現(xiàn)關(guān)系。此外,同學(xué)互評(píng)作為社會(huì)策略,涉及兩方面的學(xué)習(xí)機(jī)會(huì),一方面得到評(píng)價(jià)和建議,另一方面還從評(píng)價(jià)他人習(xí)作中得到反思。這兩方面的內(nèi)容在本研究中都以文字形式提取,從而綜合判斷修改的多樣化來(lái)源。135名美國(guó)大學(xué)生參與了此次研究。在一個(gè)十六周的學(xué)期,學(xué)生們根據(jù)... 

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：249 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士

【文章目錄】：
ABSTRACT
摘要
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
    1.1 RESEARCH BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
    1.2 SCOPE OF THE STUDY
    1.3 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
    1.4 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
    1.5 AN OVERVIEW OF CHAPTERS
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW
    2.1 THE CONCEPT OF REVISION
    2.2 PREVIOUS STUDIES ON REVISION
        2.2.1 Categorizations of revision
        2.2.2 Differences of revision between skilled and unskilled writers
        2.2.3 Strategies of revision
    2.3 THE CONCEPT OF SELF-REGULATED REVISION
    2.4 PREVIOUS STUDIES ON SELF-REGULATION IN WRITING
        2.4.1 Self-regulation and writing
        2.4.2 Goal setting and writing
        2.4.3 Peer review and writing
    2.5 POINTS OF DEPARTURE FROM PREVIOUS STUDIES
CHAPTER 3 THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE
    3.1 THE SOCIO-COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE
    3.2 A SOCIO-COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE OF WRITING
        3.2.1 Writing as a cognitive goal-driven process
        3.2.2 Writing as a social cognitive peer-mediated process
        3.2.3 Writing as an integrated cognitive and social cognitive process
    3.3 A SOCIO-COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE OF SELF-REGULATED REVISION
        3.3.1 Writing as a process of revision
        3.3.2 Writing and revision as a self-regulated process from a socio-cognitive perspective
CHAPTER 4 RESEARCH DESIGN
    4.1 RESEARCH QUESTIONS
    4.2 RESEARCH SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS
    4.3 MATERIALS FOR ONLINE WRITING AND PEER REVIEW
    4.4 RESEARCH PROCEDURES
CHAPTER 5 AN ANALYSIS OF SELF-REGULATED REVISION
    5.1 A MULTI-DIMENSIONAL TAXONOMY OF SELF-REGULATED REVISION
        5.1.1 Illustration of revision identification
        5.1.2 Dimensions of self-regulated revision
    5.2 QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF SELF-REGULATED REVISION
        5.2.1 Low level surface changes
        5.2.2 Low level meaning changes
        5.2.3 High level meaning changes
    5.3 QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF SELF-REGULATED REVISION
        5.3.1 Numbers and sizes of self-regulated revision
        5.3.2 Effects of self-regulated revision
    5.4 SUMMARY
CHAPTER 6 AN ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL COGNITIVE STRATEGIES OF REVISION .
    6.1 WRITING GOALS
        6.1.1 Free response writing goals
        6.1.2 Writing goal survey
    6.2 PEER REVIEW
        6.2.1 Received peer comments
        6.2.2 Self-reflections from peer review
    6.3 SUMMARY
CHAPTER 7 THE RELATION BETWEEN SELF-REGULATED REVISION AND SOCIAL COGNITIVE STRATEGIES
    7.1 QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE OVERLAP BETWEEN REVISION AND SOCIAL COGNITIVE STRATEGIES
        7.1.1 Revision overlapping with a cognitive strategy
        7.1.2 Revision overlapping with social strategies
        7.1.3 Revision overlapping with social cognitive strategies
    7.2 QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN REVISION AND SOCIAL COGNITIVE STRATEGIES
        7.2.1 Quantitative coding measures and procedures
        7.2.2 The distribution and overlap percentage of revision with social cognitive strategies .
    7.3 GENERAL DISCUSSION
        7.3.1 The nature and role of writing goals
        7.3.2 The nature and role of peer review
        7.3.3 The aggregation effects of social cognitive strategies of revision
CHAPTER 8 CONCLUSION
    8.1 GENERAL FINDINGS OF THE STUDY
    8.2 CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE STUDY
    8.3 IMPLICATIONS OF THE STUDY
    8.4 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
    8.5 SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER STUDY
REFERENCES
APPENDIX A WRITING PROMPTS FOR TWO PAPERS
APPENDIX B PEER REVIEW GUIDELINES- INVOLVING COMMENTS AND RATING RUBRICS
APPENDIX C THE WRITING GOAL SURVEY
APPENDIX D STUDENT PAPER SAMPLES
PUBLICATIONS DURING THE AUTHOR’S DOCTORAL STUDY


【參考文獻(xiàn)】：
期刊論文
[1]大學(xué)生英語(yǔ)寫作焦慮自我調(diào)節(jié)策略研究[J]. 馬潔,董攀.  外語(yǔ)界. 2017(05)
[2]英語(yǔ)寫作中的同伴反饋與教師反饋對(duì)比研究[J]. 張義芬.  山東外語(yǔ)教學(xué). 2017(03)
[3]寫作自動(dòng)評(píng)估系統(tǒng)對(duì)中國(guó)大學(xué)生英語(yǔ)寫作水平影響的歷時(shí)研究[J]. 王淑雯.  山東外語(yǔ)教學(xué). 2017(02)
[4]二語(yǔ)寫作互動(dòng)中的糾錯(cuò)反饋:爭(zhēng)議與對(duì)策[J]. 李學(xué)晉.  語(yǔ)言教學(xué)與研究. 2017(01)
[5]Peerceptiv互評(píng)系統(tǒng)輔助學(xué)生英語(yǔ)寫作的研究[J]. 張�；�,狄艷華,Christian D.Schunn.  外語(yǔ)電化教學(xué). 2016(04)
[6]基于自動(dòng)評(píng)價(jià)系統(tǒng)的第二寫作過(guò)程研究[J]. 盧鹿.  外語(yǔ)界. 2016(02)
[7]修正性反饋對(duì)提高ESL寫作水平的影響——以不同國(guó)籍學(xué)習(xí)者為考察維度[J]. 王松.  外語(yǔ)學(xué)刊. 2015(03)
[8]基于批改網(wǎng)的大學(xué)英語(yǔ)自主寫作教學(xué)模式實(shí)踐研究[J]. 楊曉瓊,戴運(yùn)財(cái).  外語(yǔ)電化教學(xué). 2015(02)
[9]在線大學(xué)英語(yǔ)寫作形成性評(píng)價(jià)模型構(gòu)建研究[J]. 黃紅兵.  現(xiàn)代教育技術(shù). 2015(01)
[10]從通用英語(yǔ)到學(xué)術(shù)英語(yǔ)——回歸大學(xué)英語(yǔ)教學(xué)本位[J]. 蔡基剛.  外語(yǔ)與外語(yǔ)教學(xué). 2014(01)



本文編號(hào)：3717850