大陸與臺灣尋根文學(xué)比較研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-07-26 20:55
【摘要】：從五四新文化運動起始的魯迅民族劣根性批判而至1980年代的大陸文化尋根,根是20世紀(jì)乃至現(xiàn)在國人最為困擾的精神命題。其間,臺灣尋根文學(xué)(1940-70年代)與大陸尋根文學(xué)(1980年代)前后相繼,構(gòu)成了一個觀照民族生存與民族文化現(xiàn)代運演的獨特視域。不管是臺灣尋根文學(xué)的三度勃興還是大陸尋根文學(xué)的興起,其歷史激發(fā)力都與整個二十世紀(jì)最重大的民族生存事件聯(lián)系在一起,從西方列強(qiáng)入侵到國共之戰(zhàn)再到社會經(jīng)濟(jì)現(xiàn)代化建設(shè)無不最強(qiáng)烈地促使國人對自己的生存重新做出定位,而且這不是簡單的利益取舍,而是對自己人生形態(tài)的重新確證。因此,根的尋找與重塑乃是中國現(xiàn)當(dāng)代文學(xué)最核心的部位,尋根文學(xué)實則是“立人”與“立國”的文化主線在特定歷史時期的獨特嬗演,旨?xì)w于民族的現(xiàn)代性塑造。故而,大陸與臺灣尋根文學(xué)比較研究可以在相互參照中以文學(xué)為鏡觀照民族文化心理的現(xiàn)代性建構(gòu),觀照中華民族乃至中國文學(xué)自身近現(xiàn)代以來在東方與西方、傳統(tǒng)與現(xiàn)代、民族性與世界性架構(gòu)中的獨特存在。立足于此,本文分六個部分展開研究。第一部分為緒論,主要是確立本文的研究定位。一是通過美國與拉美尋根文學(xué)的探視,為本文研究獲取一個遠(yuǎn)距離的研究參照系。二是反思大陸尋根文學(xué)研究,確立本文研究的關(guān)注點與價值點。三是界定臺灣尋根文學(xué),在文學(xué)史中梳理出臺灣尋根文學(xué)的三度勃興及其歷史動因、主要內(nèi)涵與價值取向。四是在上述三個方面觀照的基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)一步明確本文研究的主要任務(wù),即:將這兩個獨特的文學(xué)存在作為互相參照與共構(gòu)的體系,探究二十世紀(jì)中國文學(xué)之于民族文化現(xiàn)代轉(zhuǎn)型的獨特?fù)?dān)當(dāng)。第二部分主要論述立身民族現(xiàn)代轉(zhuǎn)型的大歷史時空背景之中,駐足傳統(tǒng)與現(xiàn)代之間,臺灣尋根文學(xué)與大陸尋根文學(xué)切中的乃是人之存在的最本源問題,即:“我是誰?”的民族自我身份認(rèn)證問題,再現(xiàn)出二十世紀(jì)民族生存最本源的精神痛苦與焦慮。本文認(rèn)為,大陸與臺灣尋根文學(xué)實則切中的乃是中國自近現(xiàn)代以來在世界現(xiàn)代化大格局中重新認(rèn)證民族身份這一最根本的問題。而當(dāng)一個民族需要自我認(rèn)證的時候,這意味著它遭遇到了最本源的文化危機(jī),即:根的焦慮、惶惑與迷失。二者互補(bǔ)性地呈示出了這一民族現(xiàn)代轉(zhuǎn)型的最本源文化危機(jī)。具體地說,大陸尋根文學(xué)深蘊(yùn)著“丑陋的中國人”的劣根焦慮,臺灣尋根文學(xué)深蘊(yùn)著“亞細(xì)亞孤兒”的失根惶惑,而二者又同歸于生命之根的現(xiàn)代迷失。第三部分主要論述在失根的惶惑與現(xiàn)代的迷失雙重夾擊之下,大陸與臺灣尋根文學(xué)對于“我從哪里來?”的探尋,而這對于現(xiàn)代轉(zhuǎn)型中精神還不足以自創(chuàng)自立的民族而言是更為可靠的現(xiàn)實應(yīng)對。具體地說,一方面在現(xiàn)代轉(zhuǎn)型的歷史過程中,原有的中國傳統(tǒng)文化在現(xiàn)實中不能再像兩千多年來的民族生存那樣使個體產(chǎn)生安身立命的意義感;另一方面異質(zhì)的西方文化還沒有內(nèi)化成個體生存理所當(dāng)然的意義源。在這樣的時代格局之中,大陸與臺灣尋根文學(xué)顯示出三個尋根維度:一是尋向以儒家為主體的傳統(tǒng)主流文化,試圖尋找人之初的根性。二是探尋民族傳統(tǒng)文化在世俗生存中到底具有怎樣獨特的超越品格,一種從“活著”這一基點不斷趨向“超越”這一基點的人之區(qū)別于動物的本源性存在。其間,顯示出道禪作為中國式超越對于世俗生存的人文關(guān)懷,作為民族獨特的心性文化以一種靜忍的面目使人在現(xiàn)實困境與瑣凡的日常生存之中獲得一種超越性的定力,一種區(qū)別于外在政治意識形態(tài)標(biāo)簽的人的內(nèi)在精神本源性超越。三是試圖確證民族歷史文化底層的生命原力,一種在歷史的長河中未被湮滅的生命本來力量。第四部分主要論述在傳統(tǒng)母體文化的根性追尋中,臺灣尋根文學(xué)凸顯出了尋根者一種渴求母體自足的文化棄兒身份,大陸尋根文學(xué)凸顯出了尋根者一種內(nèi)隱的文化自恨的溺兒身份。而正是這種不同的棄兒與溺兒社會、文化身份凸顯出了二者相異的生命與文化圖景,進(jìn)而互補(bǔ)性地為民族文化的現(xiàn)代轉(zhuǎn)型展示出一種獨特的召示性。具體地說,臺灣尋根文學(xué)展示出個體生存民族根性與民族母體不能夠相合相依的棄兒狀態(tài),兩難而尷尬的生存現(xiàn)實更凸顯出棄兒對回歸母體自足的渴求,凸顯出傳統(tǒng)母體文化那種維系民族生存本有的自足部位的可貴,因為惟有這一部位的存在才能凸顯出個體在世生存的本有身份,又能藉此創(chuàng)生出現(xiàn)代前行的自我精神力量。大陸尋根文學(xué)對于民族傳統(tǒng)文化的心理實則依然是對五四新文學(xué)的一種文化心理延續(xù),隱伏著一種溺兒棄母的文化自恨與棄母而求新生的歷史主義文化心態(tài)。創(chuàng)作主體強(qiáng)烈的現(xiàn)代個體意識與批判眼光祛除了臺灣尋根文學(xué)那種尋求回歸母體的自足與溫慰,這時對于根的尋找既是對母體的回歸更是對于母體的蛻脫,一種與現(xiàn)代世界接軌進(jìn)而在精神與物質(zhì)上同步的企盼。第五部分主要論述臺灣尋根文學(xué)與大陸尋根文學(xué)互補(bǔ)性的民族文化現(xiàn)代重建。具體地說,臺灣尋根文學(xué)顯示出臺灣人立身文化棄兒身份,面對“西化”(現(xiàn)代化)取向于民族本土化的堅守,試圖尋找本民族超越時空的情感紐帶與意義符號以尋寄自身與確證存在,因為竣迫而特殊的現(xiàn)實生存情勢使臺灣人更為強(qiáng)烈地意識到文化本土化之于個體自身存在的重要性。但是,這種本土化絕不是回到傳統(tǒng)文化重土安遷的封閉狀態(tài),也不是遠(yuǎn)離時代歷史的自說自話,而是以文化母體為孵育場,以現(xiàn)代為取向,化異質(zhì)為新質(zhì)的民族文化重建。大陸尋根文學(xué)顯示出大陸人立身文化溺兒身份,面對民族文化中人性因襲之重取向于民族現(xiàn)代化的蛻脫,試圖在民族文化的重新審視之中將民族文化向現(xiàn)代運演提升,以期與世界性接軌與同步,故而鮮有臺灣尋根文學(xué)那樣對于外國經(jīng)濟(jì)和文化支配性影響的批判,也鮮有臺灣尋根文學(xué)那樣對于現(xiàn)代化之于生命侵蝕的文化反思,其回歸傳統(tǒng)的目的是為了民族發(fā)展避免重蹈歷史覆轍,是為了民族現(xiàn)代振興而做出新的文化選擇,顯示出一種臺灣尋根文學(xué)所沒有的歷史主義態(tài)度。因此,大陸尋根文學(xué)回歸傳統(tǒng)的目的并不是像臺灣尋根文學(xué)那樣確證本土性,而是為了實現(xiàn)傳統(tǒng)在新的歷史階段的蛻脫;所要尋找的也并不是臺灣尋根文學(xué)所訴求的中華民族之為中華民族的特質(zhì),而是中華民族在新的時代大勢之中能否跟上現(xiàn)代步伐的根性可能。因此,臺灣與大陸尋根文學(xué)雖然都有著返回傳統(tǒng)母體的表象,但是二者的主要指向是迥異的,前者尋找根性母體是為了批判外國經(jīng)濟(jì)和文化的支配性影響,喚起中國的、民族主義的、自立自強(qiáng)的精神,而后者尋找根性母體恰恰是為了實現(xiàn)與這一母體的蛻脫,在與世界的接軌之中走向民族的現(xiàn)代新生。臺灣尋根文學(xué)集中顯示出在現(xiàn)代化總體性趨勢之中文化本土化的必不可少,大陸尋根文學(xué)深層顯示出在與傳統(tǒng)慣性的蛻脫之中文化現(xiàn)代化的時代需求。二者前后相繼互補(bǔ)性地折射出20世紀(jì)傳統(tǒng)與現(xiàn)代沖突與融合及由此引起中國文化嬗變的中國歷史文化運行主線,呈示出民族文化現(xiàn)代轉(zhuǎn)型的兩翼——本土化與現(xiàn)代化。第六部分主要論述臺灣尋根文學(xué)與大陸尋根文學(xué)的藝術(shù)形態(tài)。具體地說,二者在總體藝術(shù)格局上雖然都取向于土地書寫,但是藝術(shù)形態(tài)與內(nèi)質(zhì)又是不同的。在總體藝術(shù)表征上,臺灣尋根文學(xué)彌漫著“化不開的鄉(xiāng)愁”,顯示出青花瓷般的中國古典藝術(shù)的現(xiàn)代復(fù)活,顯示出中國傳統(tǒng)藝術(shù)的現(xiàn)代性內(nèi)化,顯示出溫潤而精致的古典藝術(shù)的總體性取向與藝術(shù)特質(zhì),這也是臺灣尋根文學(xué)最動人的藝術(shù)感染力與文化向心力。于此,滿懷漂泊感的“棄兒”、“孤兒”獲得了一種回歸母體的文化自足。在世界總體性現(xiàn)代轉(zhuǎn)型的大趨勢之中,復(fù)活這種溫潤而精致的古典藝術(shù)并不是機(jī)械地去仿寫唐詩宋詞,而是在內(nèi)在藝術(shù)特質(zhì)上復(fù)活那種民族文化所永恒具有慰藉心靈的溫潤磁性和與之相應(yīng)具有溫情色彩的精致文化傳統(tǒng)。同是取向于土地的語言藝術(shù),大陸尋根文學(xué)卻沒有那種化不開的鄉(xiāng)愁,也沒有在藝術(shù)形態(tài)上走向溫潤而精致的古典藝術(shù),而是走向封閉、原始、落后的“原鄉(xiāng)”書寫,聚焦于那方原鄉(xiāng)土地的民間秘史,一種正邪糾結(jié)、善惡難辨、藏污納垢而又蘊(yùn)含著人性張力的民間生活形態(tài),顯示出以區(qū)別于主流意識形態(tài)的文化姿態(tài)與還原歷史真實的民間愿望,并由此深入到人性與欲望的洞穴,試圖恢復(fù)人性在正史大幕之下的本來面目,凸顯出更能表現(xiàn)民族靈魂深處的充滿張力的現(xiàn)代藝術(shù)。在藝術(shù)企圖上,臺灣尋根文學(xué)試圖借助這種溫潤精致的古典藝術(shù)獲取民族文化之于惡性西化的文化反撥力與抗衡力,實現(xiàn)民族文化在惡性西化境遇里的自立與自信,而大陸尋根文學(xué)作家則試圖借助原鄉(xiāng)書寫的現(xiàn)代藝術(shù)使中國文學(xué)擺脫對政治的長期依附,并借助民族文化走向現(xiàn)代的大勢融入世界文學(xué)的格局。
[Abstract]:From the beginning of the 54 new cultural movement, the critique of Lu Xun's national inferiority to the cultural roots of the mainland culture in the 1980s is the most plagued spiritual proposition of the people in twentieth Century and even now. During the period, the Taiwan seeking root literature (1940-70 years) and the mainland seeking root literature (1980s) have formed a view of the survival of the nation and the modern national culture. The unique horizon of the performance, whether the three degree of Taiwan root seeking literature or the rise of mainland root seeking literature, has been linked to the most important national survival events of the twentieth Century. The invasion of the Western powers to the war of the Kuomintang and the modernization of the society and economy is all the most important to the people of their own. It is not a simple choice of interests, but a reconfirmation of the form of one's own life. Therefore, the search and reshape of the root is the most important part of the Chinese contemporary literature. The root seeking literature is a unique evolution of the cultural mainline of "erect man" and "erect" in a specific historical period, aiming at the nation. Modern nature, therefore, the comparative study of the mainland and Taiwan root seeking literature can take literature as a mirror to look at the modern construction of the cultural psychology of the nation, and to observe the unique existence of the Chinese and the Chinese literature in the East and the west, the tradition and the modern, the national nature and the world structure. The article is divided into six parts. The first part is the introduction, which is mainly to establish the research orientation of this article. First, through the exploration of the American and Latin American root seeking literature, to obtain a long distance research reference system for this study. Two is to reflect on the study of mainland root seeking literature and establish the focus and value point of this study. Three is to define the root seeking of Taiwan. Literature, in the history of literature, combs the three degree of prosperity of Taiwan root seeking literature and its historical motivation, the main connotation and value orientation. Four is to further clarify the main tasks of this study on the basis of the above three aspects, that is, to explore the two unique literature as a system of mutual reference and co construction, and to explore the twentieth Century China. Literature is the unique responsibility of the modern transformation of national culture. The second part mainly deals with the great historical and temporal background of the modern transformation of the nation. Between the traditional and the modern, the root of Taiwan's root seeking literature and the mainland seeking root literature is the most essential problem of the human existence, namely, "who am I?" the problem of national identity authentication, It reproduces the spiritual pain and anxiety of the most essential source of national survival in the twentieth Century. This article holds that the root of the mainland and Taiwan seeking root literature is the most fundamental problem for China to re authenticate national identity in the large pattern of world modernization since modern times. And when a nation needs to be self certified, it means it is encountered. To the most original cultural crisis, that is, the anxiety, confusion and lost of the root, the two complementation shows the most primitive cultural crisis of the modern transformation of the nation. Specifically, the mainland root seeking literature has a deep root anxiety of "ugly Chinese", and the Taiwan seeking root literature is deeply puzzled by the "Asiatic orphans", and the two The third part of the modern lost of the root of life. The third part mainly discusses that the search for "where do I come from?" is the search for "where do I come from?" and this is a more reliable and realistic response to a nation whose spirit is not sufficient for self creation in the modern transition. On the one hand, in the historical process of modern transformation, the original Chinese traditional culture can not make the individual feel the sense of meaning like the existence of the ethnic group for more than two thousand years. On the other hand, the heterogeneous western culture has not been internalized into the meaning source of the individual survival. The Taiwan root seeking literature shows three root seeking dimensions: one is seeking the traditional mainstream culture with the Confucianism as the main body, trying to find the root of the people at the beginning. Two is to explore how the traditional culture of the nation is unique in the secular existence and how to transcend the character in the secular existence, and a person's area from "living" as the basis of "Surpassing". It is different from the original existence of the animal. In the meantime, it shows that Taoism as a Chinese style transcendence to the humane care of the secular existence, as a national unique heart culture with a kind of statically bearing face, makes people get a transcendental force in the real predicament and the daily existence of the trivial, a person that distinguishes the label of the external political ideology. The intrinsic spiritual transcendence of the inner spirit. Three is an attempt to confirm the life force at the bottom of the national history and culture, the original force of life which has not been annihilated in the long history of the history. The fourth part mainly discusses the root pursuit of the traditional mother culture, and the Taiwan seeking root literature highlights the identity of a cultural abandoned child longing for the self-sufficiency of the mother. The mainland root seeking literature highlights the hidden identity of the root seekers with a hidden culture and self hatred. But this is the different abandoned and drowning society, and the cultural identity highlights the different life and culture of the two, and then complementing the modern transformation of the national culture to show a unique appeal. Specifically, Xun Genwen, Xun Genwen The study shows the state of the individual survival of the individual and the abandoned child in which the national parent can not coincide. The dilemma and embarrassment of survival reality highlights the desire of the abandoned child to return to the mother's self-sufficiency, and highlights the valuable part of the traditional mother culture that maintains the self-sufficient part of the national existence, because only the existence of this part can be highlighted. The individual has the identity of living in the world, and can create a modern self spiritual force. The psychological reality of the mainland's root seeking literature is still a cultural psychological continuation of the 54 new literature. The strong modern individual consciousness and critical vision of the main body dispel the self-sufficiency and comfort of the Taiwan seeking root literature seeking return to the mother body. At this time, the search for the root is not only the regression of the mother body but also the mother body, a kind of hope for the same step with the modern world in spirit and material. The fifth part mainly discusses the search for Taiwan. The modern reconstruction of the national culture complementing the complementation of the root literature and the mainland seeking root literature. In particular, the Taiwan root seeking literature shows the identity of the Taiwanese, and the adherence to the localization of the "Westernization" (modernization) in the national localization. The special realities of existence make the Taiwanese people more strongly aware of the importance of cultural localization to their own existence. However, this localization is not a return to the closed state of the traditional culture, nor is it far from the history of the times. The mainland root seeking literature shows the identity of the mainland people in cultural and drowning, and in the face of the reorientation of human nature in national culture in the national culture, trying to promote the national culture to the modern transport in the re examination of the national culture, so as to be in line with and synchronize with the world. There are few criticisms of the dominant influence of Taiwan root seeking literature on foreign economy and culture, and there are few cultural reflections on the erosion of life in the modernization of Taiwan's root literature. The purpose of returning to the tradition is to avoid a repeat of the historical track and to make a new cultural choice for the national development. A kind of historical attitude that Taiwan root seeking literature does not have. Therefore, the return to tradition of mainland root seeking literature is not to confirm native nature like Taiwan's root seeking literature, but to realize the degrading of tradition in a new historical stage, and not to find the Chinese nation for the Chinese nation of Taiwan seeking root literature. The trait is the root possibility of the Chinese nation to keep up with the modern pace in the new era. Therefore, although both Taiwan and mainland Chinese root seeking literature have the appearance of returning to the traditional mother body, the main points of the two are very different. The former seeks the root matrix to judge the dominant influence of the foreign economy and culture. The spirit of nationalism, nationalism and self-reliance, and the latter in search of the root matrix is precisely for the realization of the mother's exu, which is in line with the world to the modern freshman. Taiwan root seeking literature shows the necessity of cultural localization in the general trend of modernization. The needs of the cultural modernization in the transformation of the traditional inertia are shown. The two parties have complementing the conflict and integration of the traditional and modern times of twentieth Century and the main line of Chinese culture and culture that caused the evolution of Chinese culture, showing the two wings of the modern transformation of national culture - the localization and modernization. Sixth parts To discuss the artistic form of Taiwan root seeking literature and mainland seeking root literature. Specifically, although both of the two are orientated in the overall artistic pattern in the land writing, the artistic form and the quality are different. In the overall artistic representation, Taiwan's root seeking literature is filled with "the inseparable homesickness", showing the Chinese classical art of blue and white porcelain. The modern resurrection of the art shows the modernistic internalization of Chinese traditional art, showing the overall orientation and artistic characteristics of the warm and delicate classical art, which is the most touching artistic and cultural centripetal force of Taiwan's root seeking literature. In the trend of the general modern transformation of the world, the resurrection of this warm and delicate classical art is not a mechanical way to imitate the poems and songs of the Tang Dynasty, but to resurrect the warm and moist magnetism of the kind of national culture and the delicate cultural tradition with the corresponding warmth of the spirit of the national culture. To the language art of the land, the mainland root seeking literature does not have the inseparable homesickness, nor does it go to the warm and delicate classical art in the art form, but to the closed, primitive and backward "Hometown" writing, focusing on the folk secret history of the native land, a kind of tangled, evil, evil, evil and evil. The form of folk life with the tension of human nature shows the folk desire that distinguishes the cultural attitude from the mainstream ideology and the true folk desire to restore the history, and thus goes deep into the cave of human nature and desire, trying to restore the nature of human nature under the grand curtain of the history, and to highlight the modern art which is more capable of expressing the tension in the deep of the national soul. In the artistic attempt, the Taiwan root seeking literature tries to obtain the cultural backwash and counterbalance of the national culture in the malignant Westernization with the help of this warm and delicate classical art, to realize the self-reliance and confidence of the national culture in the malignant Westernization situation, while the writers of the mainland seeking root literature try to get rid of the Chinese literature with the help of the modern art written in the native land. The long-term attachment to politics and the integration of the national culture and the modern trend into the pattern of world literature.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：I206
本文編號：2147261
[Abstract]:From the beginning of the 54 new cultural movement, the critique of Lu Xun's national inferiority to the cultural roots of the mainland culture in the 1980s is the most plagued spiritual proposition of the people in twentieth Century and even now. During the period, the Taiwan seeking root literature (1940-70 years) and the mainland seeking root literature (1980s) have formed a view of the survival of the nation and the modern national culture. The unique horizon of the performance, whether the three degree of Taiwan root seeking literature or the rise of mainland root seeking literature, has been linked to the most important national survival events of the twentieth Century. The invasion of the Western powers to the war of the Kuomintang and the modernization of the society and economy is all the most important to the people of their own. It is not a simple choice of interests, but a reconfirmation of the form of one's own life. Therefore, the search and reshape of the root is the most important part of the Chinese contemporary literature. The root seeking literature is a unique evolution of the cultural mainline of "erect man" and "erect" in a specific historical period, aiming at the nation. Modern nature, therefore, the comparative study of the mainland and Taiwan root seeking literature can take literature as a mirror to look at the modern construction of the cultural psychology of the nation, and to observe the unique existence of the Chinese and the Chinese literature in the East and the west, the tradition and the modern, the national nature and the world structure. The article is divided into six parts. The first part is the introduction, which is mainly to establish the research orientation of this article. First, through the exploration of the American and Latin American root seeking literature, to obtain a long distance research reference system for this study. Two is to reflect on the study of mainland root seeking literature and establish the focus and value point of this study. Three is to define the root seeking of Taiwan. Literature, in the history of literature, combs the three degree of prosperity of Taiwan root seeking literature and its historical motivation, the main connotation and value orientation. Four is to further clarify the main tasks of this study on the basis of the above three aspects, that is, to explore the two unique literature as a system of mutual reference and co construction, and to explore the twentieth Century China. Literature is the unique responsibility of the modern transformation of national culture. The second part mainly deals with the great historical and temporal background of the modern transformation of the nation. Between the traditional and the modern, the root of Taiwan's root seeking literature and the mainland seeking root literature is the most essential problem of the human existence, namely, "who am I?" the problem of national identity authentication, It reproduces the spiritual pain and anxiety of the most essential source of national survival in the twentieth Century. This article holds that the root of the mainland and Taiwan seeking root literature is the most fundamental problem for China to re authenticate national identity in the large pattern of world modernization since modern times. And when a nation needs to be self certified, it means it is encountered. To the most original cultural crisis, that is, the anxiety, confusion and lost of the root, the two complementation shows the most primitive cultural crisis of the modern transformation of the nation. Specifically, the mainland root seeking literature has a deep root anxiety of "ugly Chinese", and the Taiwan seeking root literature is deeply puzzled by the "Asiatic orphans", and the two The third part of the modern lost of the root of life. The third part mainly discusses that the search for "where do I come from?" is the search for "where do I come from?" and this is a more reliable and realistic response to a nation whose spirit is not sufficient for self creation in the modern transition. On the one hand, in the historical process of modern transformation, the original Chinese traditional culture can not make the individual feel the sense of meaning like the existence of the ethnic group for more than two thousand years. On the other hand, the heterogeneous western culture has not been internalized into the meaning source of the individual survival. The Taiwan root seeking literature shows three root seeking dimensions: one is seeking the traditional mainstream culture with the Confucianism as the main body, trying to find the root of the people at the beginning. Two is to explore how the traditional culture of the nation is unique in the secular existence and how to transcend the character in the secular existence, and a person's area from "living" as the basis of "Surpassing". It is different from the original existence of the animal. In the meantime, it shows that Taoism as a Chinese style transcendence to the humane care of the secular existence, as a national unique heart culture with a kind of statically bearing face, makes people get a transcendental force in the real predicament and the daily existence of the trivial, a person that distinguishes the label of the external political ideology. The intrinsic spiritual transcendence of the inner spirit. Three is an attempt to confirm the life force at the bottom of the national history and culture, the original force of life which has not been annihilated in the long history of the history. The fourth part mainly discusses the root pursuit of the traditional mother culture, and the Taiwan seeking root literature highlights the identity of a cultural abandoned child longing for the self-sufficiency of the mother. The mainland root seeking literature highlights the hidden identity of the root seekers with a hidden culture and self hatred. But this is the different abandoned and drowning society, and the cultural identity highlights the different life and culture of the two, and then complementing the modern transformation of the national culture to show a unique appeal. Specifically, Xun Genwen, Xun Genwen The study shows the state of the individual survival of the individual and the abandoned child in which the national parent can not coincide. The dilemma and embarrassment of survival reality highlights the desire of the abandoned child to return to the mother's self-sufficiency, and highlights the valuable part of the traditional mother culture that maintains the self-sufficient part of the national existence, because only the existence of this part can be highlighted. The individual has the identity of living in the world, and can create a modern self spiritual force. The psychological reality of the mainland's root seeking literature is still a cultural psychological continuation of the 54 new literature. The strong modern individual consciousness and critical vision of the main body dispel the self-sufficiency and comfort of the Taiwan seeking root literature seeking return to the mother body. At this time, the search for the root is not only the regression of the mother body but also the mother body, a kind of hope for the same step with the modern world in spirit and material. The fifth part mainly discusses the search for Taiwan. The modern reconstruction of the national culture complementing the complementation of the root literature and the mainland seeking root literature. In particular, the Taiwan root seeking literature shows the identity of the Taiwanese, and the adherence to the localization of the "Westernization" (modernization) in the national localization. The special realities of existence make the Taiwanese people more strongly aware of the importance of cultural localization to their own existence. However, this localization is not a return to the closed state of the traditional culture, nor is it far from the history of the times. The mainland root seeking literature shows the identity of the mainland people in cultural and drowning, and in the face of the reorientation of human nature in national culture in the national culture, trying to promote the national culture to the modern transport in the re examination of the national culture, so as to be in line with and synchronize with the world. There are few criticisms of the dominant influence of Taiwan root seeking literature on foreign economy and culture, and there are few cultural reflections on the erosion of life in the modernization of Taiwan's root literature. The purpose of returning to the tradition is to avoid a repeat of the historical track and to make a new cultural choice for the national development. A kind of historical attitude that Taiwan root seeking literature does not have. Therefore, the return to tradition of mainland root seeking literature is not to confirm native nature like Taiwan's root seeking literature, but to realize the degrading of tradition in a new historical stage, and not to find the Chinese nation for the Chinese nation of Taiwan seeking root literature. The trait is the root possibility of the Chinese nation to keep up with the modern pace in the new era. Therefore, although both Taiwan and mainland Chinese root seeking literature have the appearance of returning to the traditional mother body, the main points of the two are very different. The former seeks the root matrix to judge the dominant influence of the foreign economy and culture. The spirit of nationalism, nationalism and self-reliance, and the latter in search of the root matrix is precisely for the realization of the mother's exu, which is in line with the world to the modern freshman. Taiwan root seeking literature shows the necessity of cultural localization in the general trend of modernization. The needs of the cultural modernization in the transformation of the traditional inertia are shown. The two parties have complementing the conflict and integration of the traditional and modern times of twentieth Century and the main line of Chinese culture and culture that caused the evolution of Chinese culture, showing the two wings of the modern transformation of national culture - the localization and modernization. Sixth parts To discuss the artistic form of Taiwan root seeking literature and mainland seeking root literature. Specifically, although both of the two are orientated in the overall artistic pattern in the land writing, the artistic form and the quality are different. In the overall artistic representation, Taiwan's root seeking literature is filled with "the inseparable homesickness", showing the Chinese classical art of blue and white porcelain. The modern resurrection of the art shows the modernistic internalization of Chinese traditional art, showing the overall orientation and artistic characteristics of the warm and delicate classical art, which is the most touching artistic and cultural centripetal force of Taiwan's root seeking literature. In the trend of the general modern transformation of the world, the resurrection of this warm and delicate classical art is not a mechanical way to imitate the poems and songs of the Tang Dynasty, but to resurrect the warm and moist magnetism of the kind of national culture and the delicate cultural tradition with the corresponding warmth of the spirit of the national culture. To the language art of the land, the mainland root seeking literature does not have the inseparable homesickness, nor does it go to the warm and delicate classical art in the art form, but to the closed, primitive and backward "Hometown" writing, focusing on the folk secret history of the native land, a kind of tangled, evil, evil, evil and evil. The form of folk life with the tension of human nature shows the folk desire that distinguishes the cultural attitude from the mainstream ideology and the true folk desire to restore the history, and thus goes deep into the cave of human nature and desire, trying to restore the nature of human nature under the grand curtain of the history, and to highlight the modern art which is more capable of expressing the tension in the deep of the national soul. In the artistic attempt, the Taiwan root seeking literature tries to obtain the cultural backwash and counterbalance of the national culture in the malignant Westernization with the help of this warm and delicate classical art, to realize the self-reliance and confidence of the national culture in the malignant Westernization situation, while the writers of the mainland seeking root literature try to get rid of the Chinese literature with the help of the modern art written in the native land. The long-term attachment to politics and the integration of the national culture and the modern trend into the pattern of world literature.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：I206
【共引文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 解孝娟;二十世紀(jì)五、六十年代旅外作家與八、九十年代“新移民作家”小說比較研究[D];山東大學(xué);2008年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 程燦;“家園”的失落與追尋[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2011年
，本文編號：2147261
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shoufeilunwen/rwkxbs/2147261.html
最近更新
教材專著
