技藝與皇權(quán):清宮造辦處的歷史研究
[Abstract]:Handicraft is the most important skill expression in ancient society. This paper takes the Qing palace office as the research object, takes the technical social history as the research angle, adopts the literature investigation method, the contrast analysis method and the document metrology method, studies the historical evolution of the Qing palace building office, and probes into its historical significance. At the same time, try to respond to the Qing Palace Office of the artisanal skills reflected in the problem. Through the research, the article draws the following conclusions: first, the Qing Palace Office is a production institution of the Qing Dynasty, formed in the historical clues of the continuous improvement and development of the Qing Dynasty. Is under the guidance of Emperor Kangxi around the heart of the temple workshop and the formation of the Qing Dynasty imperial handcraft department. In the early Qing Dynasty, there existed the alternation between the Ministry of Industry system and the inner government system, and the establishment of the Office of the Qing Dynasty finally realized the transformation from the inner court production to the inner government system. Secondly, according to the amount of workload undertaken by the Qing palace office, the history of the office is divided into five periods: establishment period, development period, peak period, conservation period and extinction period. In the history of these changes, the name of the Qing palace building office has undergone changes such as "Yangxin Hall", "Building Office Office", "Yangxin Dian Office", "House Office Building Office", and so on. It has also experienced corresponding changes such as the Yangxin Temple and the Wushu Hall. Yangxin Temple Office and the House Office of the four stages. Third, the production network of the Qing palace office is all over the country, and its workshops are divided into two parts: inside and outside Beijing. The layout of the workshops in Beijing presents the characteristics of "city and garden double pattern", and the place of production outside Beijing is the supplement of the workshop in Beijing. The two ends of the imperial art network in the Qing Dynasty were the court and the place. Between the court and the place, the local skill represented by "snowdrift white" supports and complements the court skill from artisans, materials, utensils, etc. And the court art also by the circulation of objects to affect the local way. Fourth, emperors, officials and craftsmen played different roles in the Qing palace office. The two emperors Yongzheng and Qianlong enthusiastically participated in the production of the work as designers and managers; officials, especially those represented by Prince Yi Yunxiang, Haiwang and Tang Ying, were typical "technical officials". The artisans are the subjects of the Qing Palace with their personal ability and skill savvy in the management of every link of the Qing Palace Office. Between emperors and craftsmen, the role of artisans' subjectivity is not excluded by the participation of imperial power, on the contrary, there are some bright points in the craftsmen who cooperate with the demands of emperors through positive posture. Craftsmen from all over the country and even foreign countries cooperated with the monarchs to form the court skills of the Qing Dynasty. Fifth, the manufacturing function of the Qing palace office has the characteristic of "family and country duality". The unique features of the Qing palace office are the rich kinds of workshops and the types of skills. Therefore, it is the most concentrated handcraft exchange platform in Chinese history. And court art is the precious historical heritage left over by the Qing palace office.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:北京科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:J509.2
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 張學(xué)渝;李曉岑;;清宮造辦處成立若干問題新探[J];廣西民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(自然科學(xué)版);2015年04期
2 畢傳龍;;雍乾時期的手工技藝觀念新視角——西方傳教士與清宮琺瑯作手工行業(yè)知識傳承[J];創(chuàng)新;2015年03期
3 張麗;;清宮銅器制造考——以雍、乾二朝為例[J];故宮博物院院刊;2013年05期
4 楊勇;;造辦處檔案所見乾隆朝漆器刻款問題研究[J];中國國家博物館館刊;2013年06期
5 李芝安;;清代朝珠述論[J];中國國家博物館館刊;2013年06期
6 趙翰生;;《大元氈}工物記》所載毛紡織史料述[J];自然科學(xué)史研究;2013年02期
7 張秉旺;文舉;;清代皇家御用“玻璃廠”的確切地址小考[J];東方收藏;2013年04期
8 朱曉艷;;由“蘇州樣、廣東匠”引發(fā)的思考[J];社會科學(xué)論壇;2013年04期
9 劉潞;;從南懷仁到馬國賢:康熙宮廷西洋版畫之演變[J];故宮學(xué)刊;2013年01期
10 劉輝;;康熙朝洋畫家:杰凡尼·熱拉蒂尼——兼論康熙對西洋繪畫之態(tài)度[J];故宮博物院院刊;2013年02期
相關(guān)會議論文 前1條
1 王和平;;康熙朝御用玻璃廠與西方傳教士[A];中外關(guān)系史論文集第14輯——新視野下的中外關(guān)系史[C];2008年
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條
1 李國榮;;清代官窯瓷器為何大量留存民間[N];中國檔案報;2013年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條
1 曹天成;郎世寧在華境遇及其所畫瘦馬研究[D];中央美術(shù)學(xué)院;2011年
2 劉虎;康雍乾三朝宮廷繪畫研究[D];天津大學(xué);2011年
3 熊Z,
本文編號:2121673
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shoufeilunwen/rwkxbs/2121673.html