本文選題：君師權(quán)力　切入點：太學(xué)空間重構(gòu)　出處：《華東師范大學(xué)》2016年博士論文

【摘要】：明初“君師合一”歷程塑造了一種皇權(quán)新形態(tài)——君師權(quán)力。以往的研究一般從思想史與政治史的宏大視角進行,缺乏深入細(xì)節(jié)的微觀分析。本研究旨在另辟蹊徑,立足朱元璋規(guī)劃與設(shè)計的南雍建筑,從微觀空間史視角追溯、探討并澄清明初“君師權(quán)力崛起”的歷史真相與詳情。這項個案研究的理論、方法與路徑,包含密切關(guān)聯(lián)的三個要點：1、“彝倫秩序”與皇權(quán)正當(dāng)性的塑造。明初“君師權(quán)力的崛起”發(fā)生于儒家政治文化傳統(tǒng)中,集中折射了皇權(quán)正當(dāng)性塑造方式的嬗變。儒家“圣王精神”植根于天人之際的超越意識,以建構(gòu)“彝倫秩序”為最高目標(biāo),并表現(xiàn)為“天人相應(yīng)”與“天人合一”兩種正當(dāng)性形式。朱元璋通過將兩種正當(dāng)性方式結(jié)合起來,實現(xiàn)了皇權(quán)正當(dāng)性的新型塑造方式。2、太學(xué)空間結(jié)構(gòu)與彝倫秩序的“表征關(guān)系”。借鑒空間生產(chǎn)、文化研究與社會學(xué)的理論與方法,提出“敘位機制”概念分析太學(xué)空間結(jié)構(gòu)與皇權(quán)正當(dāng)性塑造的內(nèi)在聯(lián)系。這一概念的基本內(nèi)涵如下：一方面,太學(xué)空間層面的“位”與社會關(guān)系層面的“倫”存在“表征關(guān)系”,使得太學(xué)空間結(jié)構(gòu)成為表征“彝倫秩序”的意識形態(tài)符號；另一方面,受到這種符號制約的不同個體,又能在實踐中理解、領(lǐng)會、認(rèn)同并遵循“彝倫秩序”內(nèi)在的行為邏輯。基于“敘位機制”,太學(xué)空間結(jié)構(gòu)成為塑造皇權(quán)正當(dāng)性的重要權(quán)力媒介。3、明初太學(xué)空間重構(gòu)與君師權(quán)力的構(gòu)形。借鑒空間政治學(xué)的空間矛盾分析法,具體剖析了“齋”與“堂”的空間矛盾。作為表征“彝倫秩序”的兩種神圣“原型空間”,“齋”與“堂”的空間矛盾密切關(guān)聯(lián)著明初皇權(quán)對“符號權(quán)力元資本”的控制、爭奪與壟斷。朱元璋正是利用這一空間矛盾,發(fā)起了塑造朱明皇權(quán)正當(dāng)性的太學(xué)空間政治運動,這使得明初皇權(quán)“壟斷了具有合法性的符號權(quán)力”,由此誕生了作為“符號權(quán)力元資本”的君師權(quán)力�；谏鲜鲆c,本研究依次探討了構(gòu)成敘述框架的四個“子問題”：1、“明初太學(xué)空間重構(gòu)”的基本內(nèi)涵。在明初官學(xué)大復(fù)興語境中,勾勒三座太學(xué)的營建歷程。通過對明初三座太學(xué)建筑史料進行文獻分析,澄清明初太學(xué)空間發(fā)生的三項歷史性變化：改孔廟塑像為木主；彝倫堂“御座正位”的誕生；從“六齋”到“六堂”的空間嬗變。2、朱元璋成為“道統(tǒng)承續(xù)者”的歷史真相。引出宋濂“天子立學(xué)之法”及其論爭,并以貝瓊對宋濂的駁斥為切入點,論述這場論爭的焦點問題是孔子圣師地位；在道統(tǒng)與治統(tǒng)的思想史框架中,探尋宋濂的折衷立場；剖析朱元璋“再編道統(tǒng)”的目的是為明初“君師合一”提供合法性論證。3、朱元璋“位居君師”的具體表現(xiàn)。從政教體制“深層結(jié)構(gòu)”視角,進一步分析明初“再編道統(tǒng)”的可能性與可行性；進而分析朱元璋對“以道抗勢”士大夫的打壓,并從“納師儒入官僚”與“懲罰性學(xué)規(guī)”等視角,論述明初“君師合一”統(tǒng)治策略的主要表現(xiàn)。4、君師權(quán)力在南雍空間結(jié)構(gòu)中的銘刻與表達(dá)。返歸明初太學(xué)空間重構(gòu)問題,立足“木主與孔子神圣性的表達(dá)”、“作為皇極之象的御座正位”以及“由齋到堂的空間重構(gòu)”等三個主題,剖析朱元璋如何通過“敘位機制”將“君師權(quán)力”銘刻于南雍空間結(jié)構(gòu)中,從而實現(xiàn)其再生產(chǎn)。經(jīng)過四個“子問題”的分析,本研究提出如下基本結(jié)論：1、作為一種微觀空間史現(xiàn)象,南雍建筑的誕生是明初政教關(guān)系結(jié)構(gòu)性調(diào)整的空間史信號,是明太祖朱元璋主導(dǎo)的一場太學(xué)空間政治運動,旨在將“君師合一”的新型權(quán)力關(guān)系與支配方式——“君師權(quán)力”——銘刻于太學(xué)空間中,由此造成明初太學(xué)空間重構(gòu)及其物態(tài)化的空間產(chǎn)品——南雍建筑。2、明太祖朱元璋開啟了明清帝王建構(gòu)自身“君師形象”從而塑造“皇權(quán)正當(dāng)性”的先河與傳統(tǒng)。作為一種壟斷了正當(dāng)性資源的“皇權(quán)新形態(tài)”,君師權(quán)力或許是明清皇權(quán)與宋元皇權(quán)的根本區(qū)別,不但極度強化了明清帝王的“文化與教育霸權(quán)”,而且深刻影響了明清中國的歷史進程。
[Abstract]:The "Jun division one" process creates a new form of imperial power - Jun division. Previous research from the perspective of Ideological and political history of grand history, microscopic analysis of the lack of in-depth details. The purpose of this study is to find, based on planning and design of the South Zhu Yuanzhang Yong building, dating back from the micro space history perspective to investigate, and clarify the historical truth and the details of the "Eagle division rise to power". The case study of the theory, method and route, contains three points: 1, closely related to "shape the Yi Lun and the imperial order" legitimacy. The "rise" Eagle division power occurred in the political culture of the Confucian tradition that reflects the evolution of the imperial power concentrated legitimacy shaping. Beyond consciousness of Confucian "sage spirit" is rooted in the construction of "combination of heaven with man, with the order of Yi Lun" as the highest goal, and the performance of the "man" and "day One of two forms. The legitimacy of Zhu Yuanzhang by two just combine to achieve a new way of building the legitimacy of the imperial.2, imperial space structure and the order of the "Yi Lun characterization". From the space production theory and cultural studies and sociology of law, put forward a concept of "Syria the mechanism analysis of spatial structure of the imperial power and the legitimacy of the shape of the inner link. The basic connotation of the concept are as follows: on the one hand, the space level of the" position "and" social relation "Lun" characterization of relations ", the ideology symbol space structure become the characterization of" Imperial Yi Lun order "; another by different individuals, the symbolic constraints, but also can understand, grasp in practice, identify and follow the" Yi Lun order ". Based on the internal logic of behavior" narrative mechanism ", imperial space has become plastic The important media of the legitimacy of the imperial power.3, the imperial eagle division of power and space reconstruction configuration. From the politics of space space contradiction analysis method, analyzes the contradiction of space "vegetarian" and "Hall". As the characterization of "Yi Lun" order two "prototype sacred space", "Zhai" and "Hall" the spatial conflicts are closely associated with the imperial control of "symbolic power yuan capital", competition and monopoly. Zhu Yuanzhang is the contradiction between use of the space, launched a political movement shaped space Taixue Zhu Ming Imperial legitimacy, which makes the imperial "monopoly symbol power with legitimacy, which was born as a" symbolic power yuan capital "power. Based on the above points Eagle division, this study discusses in turn constitute the narration of four" sub "framework: 1," the basic connotation of the imperial space reconstruction. "In the Ming Dynasty At the beginning of grand revival in the context of the construction process of the three seat outline. Through literature analysis is done on the third base building Ming Imperial College historical data, to clarify three historical changes in the imperial space: change the Confucian Temple statue "is born Yiluntang tablets; the throne"; from "six room" to "space evolution.2 six hall", Zhu Yuanzhang became the "orthodoxy inheritance" historical truth. The concept of Song Lian "Emperor Li Xue" law and debate, and to refute the on Song Lian Bei June as the starting point, discusses the focus of this controversy is the St. Confucius division status in the history of ideas; road system and framework the rule system, explore the song's compromise position; the analysis of Zhu Yuanzhang "teiiin orthodoxy" aims to "provide legitimacy for the.3" Eagle division, "in the concrete manifestation of the Zhu Yuanzhang Eagle division. From the perspective of political system, into a" deep structure " Further analysis of the "possibility and feasibility of teiiin orthodoxy"; and then analyzes Zhu Yuanzhang of "anti potential" literati's pressure, and from the "division of nano Confucianism into bureaucratic" and "punitive regulations" from the point of view, discusses the "Jun division one" governance strategy mainly.4, and the expression of Jun division of power in the Nanyong spatial structure in mind. Returning to the Ming Imperial College space reconstruction, based on the "expression" Mu Zhu and Confucius of the sacred, "as Huangji as the throne of normotopia" and "by the vegetarian hall to space reconstruction and other three topics, such as through the analysis of Zhu Yuanzhang" Syria mechanism "the" Eagle division power "engraved on the Nanyong spatial structure, so as to realize its reproduction. Through the analysis of the four" problem ", this research put forward the basic conclusions are as follows: 1, as a micro phenomenon in the history of space, the building is the birth of Nanyong Zheng Guan to teach The history of space signal system of structural adjustment, is a political movement space imperial Ming Zhu Yuanzhang led, aims to "Jun division one" new relation of power and domination, "Eagle division power", engraved on the imperial space, resulting in the product space structure and state space heavy imperial - building.2 Nanyong, mingtaizu Zhu Yuanzhang opened the emperors of the Ming and Qing Dynasties to construct their "Eagle division image" to create "beginning with the traditional imperial legitimacy". As a monopoly of the legitimate resources of the "imperial new form", or Xu Jun division power is a fundamental difference between the Ming and Qing Dynasties of song and Yuan Dynasty imperial power and imperial power, not only to strengthen the culture of extreme the emperors of the Ming and Qing Dynasties "and education hegemony", but also has a profound impact on the historical process of the Ming and Qing Dynasties China.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：K248
，

本文編號：1659171