發(fā)布時間：2018-01-19 01:21

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 現(xiàn)代漢語 因果關(guān)系 說明性因果關(guān)系 推論性因果關(guān)系 醒悟類因果關(guān)系 標(biāo)記模式　出處：《上海師范大學(xué)》2017年博士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：因果關(guān)系是指"原因"和"結(jié)果"之間相互聯(lián)系,也是一種客觀世界普遍聯(lián)系的重要表達(dá)形式。因果關(guān)系的一個重要特征一般是先說原因,再說結(jié)果,即"前因后果"式。有時則反過來,原因不一定在前,結(jié)果也不一定在后,即"前果后因"式。本文從語義范疇的角度對因果關(guān)系(包括說明性因果關(guān)系、推論性因果關(guān)系、醒悟類因果關(guān)系、漢語因果關(guān)系表達(dá)的無標(biāo)記形式、因果關(guān)系表達(dá)的層次與主觀性問題以及漢語與泰語因果關(guān)系表達(dá)對比)其方面進(jìn)行研究。本文的主要內(nèi)容有:第一章是緒論,對本文的相關(guān)內(nèi)容進(jìn)行說明,闡述本文的選題目的與意義、研究對象和方法、因果關(guān)系研究現(xiàn)狀,說明本文擬采用的理論和方法、語料來源,以及對本文的結(jié)構(gòu)安排。第二章是因果關(guān)系的界定及其構(gòu)成形式,并將因果關(guān)系與相關(guān)語義關(guān)系、目的關(guān)系、假設(shè)關(guān)系、條件關(guān)系、轉(zhuǎn)折關(guān)系和連貫關(guān)系等進(jìn)行比較,提出因果關(guān)系與其他相關(guān)語義關(guān)系之間的聯(lián)系和區(qū)別。此外,對表因果關(guān)系的關(guān)聯(lián)詞語在詞類的基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)行分析。第三章具體討論說明性因果關(guān)系,本章以"因?yàn)閜,所以q"為典型表達(dá)形式,"從而、以致"為特殊表達(dá)形式來討論。此外,將同義說明性因果關(guān)系表達(dá)形式從語法意義、句法結(jié)構(gòu)和語用意義方面進(jìn)行辨析。第四章具體討論推論性因果關(guān)系,本章以"既然p,就q"為典型表達(dá)形式,"可見"為特殊表達(dá)形式來討論。此外,將"既然p,就q"與"因?yàn)閜,所以Q"表達(dá)形式加以比較,從語法意義、句法結(jié)構(gòu)和語用意義方面進(jìn)行辨析。第五章討論醒悟類因果關(guān)系,以"難怪"作為醒悟類因果關(guān)系的標(biāo)志,主要討論"難怪"在因果句中的結(jié)構(gòu)類型、"難怪"的語義特征以及"難怪"的語用特征等三個方面。第六章討論漢語因果關(guān)系表達(dá)的無標(biāo)記形式,具體體現(xiàn)為述補(bǔ)結(jié)構(gòu)、連動結(jié)構(gòu)、兼語結(jié)構(gòu)、緊縮句和因果標(biāo)記的省略等,同時對其相關(guān)研究、類型以及語義聯(lián)系進(jìn)行分析。第七章討論因果關(guān)系表達(dá)的層次與主觀性問題,具體討論因果關(guān)系的層次性,包括一層因果關(guān)系和多層因果關(guān)系等兩類。將因果關(guān)系小句的排序分別為"由因到果"句和"由果溯因"句。同時探討主觀性強(qiáng)弱表達(dá)的問題。第八章是漢語與泰語因果關(guān)系表達(dá)對比。本章討論泰語因果關(guān)系概述、因果關(guān)系的相關(guān)研究以及因果關(guān)系的具體表達(dá)形式,探討漢泰語因果關(guān)系的標(biāo)記模式,揭示兩種語言的異同表現(xiàn)。第九章是結(jié)語,總結(jié)全文內(nèi)容,并說明本文的創(chuàng)新之處及存在的問題。
[Abstract]:Causality refers to the interrelation between "cause" and "result", and is also an important expression form of universal connection in the objective world. That is, "cause and effect" type. Sometimes vice versa, the reason is not necessarily in the first, the result is not necessarily in the later, that is, "the former fruit after the cause". This article from the perspective of semantic category of causality (including illustrative causality). Corollary causality, awakened causality, unmarked form of Chinese causality expression. The main contents of this paper are as follows: the first chapter is an introduction to explain the relevant contents of this paper. This paper describes the purpose and significance of this topic, research objects and methods, causality research status, the theory and methods to be adopted in this paper, language sources. The second chapter is the definition of causality and its form, and the relationship between causality and semantic relationship, purpose relationship, hypothetical relation and conditional relationship. By comparing the relationship between transition and coherence, the paper puts forward the relationship and difference between causality and other relevant semantic relations. The third chapter specifically discusses the illustrative causality, this chapter takes "because of p, so Q" as the typical expression form, thus. In addition, the synonymous declarative causality is analyzed from the aspects of grammatical meaning, syntactic structure and pragmatic meaning. Chapter 4th specifically discusses corollary causality. This chapter is discussed in terms of "p, Q" as a typical expression and "visible" as a special form of expression. In addition, the expression "Q" is compared with "Q" because of p. From the aspects of grammatical meaning, syntactic structure and pragmatic meaning, chapter 5th discusses the causality of awakening, and takes "no wonder" as the symbol of disillusioned causality. This paper mainly discusses the structural types of "no wonder" in causality sentences, the semantic features of "no wonder" and the pragmatic characteristics of "no wonder". Chapter 6th discusses the unmarked forms of causality expression in Chinese. It is embodied in the structure of narration and complement, the linked structure, the paraphrase structure, the ellipsis of the condensed sentence and the causality mark, and so on. At the same time, the relevant research is made on it. Chapter 7th discusses the hierarchy and subjectivity of the expression of causality, and discusses the hierarchy of causation in detail. The order of causality clauses is "from cause to effect" and "from effect to effect" and "from effect to effect" respectively. Chapter 8th is a comparison between Chinese and Thai causality. This chapter discusses the summary of Thai causality. The relevant research of causality and the concrete expression form of causality, discuss the marker mode of causality between Chinese and Thai, reveal the similarities and differences between the two languages. Chapter 9th is the conclusion, summarizing the content of the full text. And explains the innovation of this article and the existing problems.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：H146.3
，

本文編號：1442026