本文選題：環(huán)中國海 + 海洋文化　； 參考：《復旦學報(社會科學版)》2011年01期

【摘要】：以中國東南沿海為中心的"環(huán)中國海"是古代世界海洋文化繁榮發(fā)展的主要區(qū)域之一,"環(huán)中國海"的視野克服了以王朝"正史"為核心的傳統(tǒng)"中國歷史"框架下的錯誤海洋觀。傳統(tǒng)史學以中原遙望四方、從陸地鳥瞰海洋的"中心"自居,代表了以農耕文化為基礎的古代帝國的話語,忽視了中國古代文化大陸性與海洋性二元共存的史實,造成海洋文明史認識上的"邊緣"、"附庸"和"漢人中心論"的偏頗,無法捕捉到"海洋世界"的真實歷史及其人文價值。以幾何印紋陶遺存為核心的中國東南史前、上古考古學文化,與東南亞、大洋洲土著人文關系密切,展現了"善于用舟"的"百越—南島"土著先民文化傳播、融合的海洋性人文空間,明顯區(qū)別于北方華夏的大陸性文化體系,是失憶于漢文史籍的環(huán)中國海海洋人文土著生成的考古證據。漢唐以來,"環(huán)中國海"成為世界海洋商路網絡中最繁忙的段落,被視為"海上絲綢之路"、"陶瓷之路"、"香料之路"、"香瓷之路"、"茶葉之路"的起點,從海洋族群變遷、東南港市發(fā)展與基層海洋人文的土著特征看,被傳統(tǒng)史學譽為"漢人主導"的"大航海時代"實際上是對史前、上古東南土著海洋文化內涵的傳承與發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:The "Ring China Sea", centered on the southeast coast of China, is one of the main areas for the prosperity and development of the ancient world's marine culture. The vision of the "Rim China Sea" overcomes the traditional "Chinese history" frame, which is centered on the dynastic "official history". The wrong view of the sea. The traditional historiography regards the Central Plains as the "center" of the ocean and views the sea from the land. It represents the discourse of the ancient empire based on the farming culture, and ignores the historical facts of the dualistic coexistence of the continental and oceanic nature of the ancient Chinese culture. As a result, the "edge", "vassal" and "Han centrism" in understanding the history of marine civilization cannot capture the true history and humanistic value of "Ocean World". The prehistoric and ancient archaeological culture of southeast China, with geometric printed pottery remains as the core, is closely related to the native peoples of Southeast Asia and Oceania, showing the dissemination of the native peoples' culture of "Baiyao-Nandao", which is "good at using boats". The fusion of oceanic humanistic space, which is distinct from the continental cultural system of North China, is the archaeological evidence generated by the indigenous peoples around the China Sea, whose history is lost in the Chinese language. Since the Han and Tang dynasties, the "Ring China Sea" has become the busiest passage in the world's marine commercial network, and has been regarded as the starting point of the "maritime silk road", "ceramic road", "spice road", "fragrant porcelain road" and "tea road". From the view of the development of southeast port city and the aboriginal characteristics of the basic marine humanities, the "great sailing age", which is praised as "Han nationality leading" by traditional historiography, is actually the inheritance and development of the prehistoric and ancient southeast indigenous marine culture connotation.
【作者單位】： 廈門大學人文學院;
【基金】：教育部哲學社會科學研究重大課題攻關項目“中國海洋文明史研究”(項目批準號:2009JZD0015)的階段性研究成果
【分類號】：K203

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 徐曉望;論中國歷史上內陸文化和海洋文化的交征[J];東南文化;1988年Z1期

2 伊藤清郎,鄭毅;日本海沿岸的宗教交流[J];北華大學學報(社會科學版);1995年02期

3 李昌植;論“前期倭寇”的成份、性質及其產生原因——與新井章介先生等人商榷[J];延邊大學學報(社會科學版);1998年01期

4 曾少聰;關于中國海洋社會經濟史的討論——“廈門海洋社會經濟文化發(fā)展國際學術研討會”紀要[J];中國經濟史研究;1999年01期

5 ;中國歷史[J];東南學術;1999年04期

6 太田出,張學鋒;1999年日本史學界關于明清史的研究[J];中國史研究動態(tài);2001年11期

7 戴一峰;近代環(huán)中國海華商跨國網絡研究論綱[J];中國社會經濟史研究;2002年01期

8 鄭利萍;吳文化與當代文學創(chuàng)作[J];江南論壇;2003年03期

9 吳春明,張威;海洋考古學:西方興起與學術東漸[J];中國海洋大學學報(社會科學版);2003年03期

10 趙君堯;論大陸、海洋兩大文化圈構建的華夏文化[J];職大學報;2003年01期

相關重要報紙文章 前1條

1 金石;近代中國與世界關系的曲折演變[N];人民日報;2000年

，

本文編號：2115297