本文選題：農(nóng)民起義　切入點(diǎn)：農(nóng)民階級　出處：《史學(xué)月刊》2005年07期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：站在新世紀(jì)的高度回溯近百年來的中國史研究,人們會感到一個(gè)明顯的事實(shí),即人們過于將歷史研究現(xiàn)實(shí)化,賦予它意識形態(tài)的特性,而忽視了歷史本身的性質(zhì)。農(nóng)戰(zhàn)史研究就是一個(gè)鮮明的例子。上世紀(jì)初葉,在辛亥革命浪潮的波及下,太平天國研究一度興盛,二三十年代短短20年間,出版的太平天國史著作近30部之多,在中國史學(xué)史上第一次出現(xiàn)了高度集中的學(xué)術(shù)論題;接著到來的新民主主義革命,則將整個(gè)中國歷史上的農(nóng)民戰(zhàn)爭史研究提到了相當(dāng)?shù)臍v史高度,人們簡直就將歷史上的農(nóng)民戰(zhàn)爭看做是現(xiàn)實(shí)中國革命的直接序幕;新中國成立后的中國史研究,更將農(nóng)戰(zhàn)史研究裝扮成一朵耀眼的明珠,40年間發(fā)表論文4000多篇,出版著作300多部,在史學(xué)研究領(lǐng)域形成了趨之若騖之勢;而到了80年代中期以后,隨著現(xiàn)實(shí)生活中階級斗爭問題的鮮有提及,隨著農(nóng)業(yè)國向工業(yè)國的迅猛過渡,加之建立穩(wěn)定社會秩序的目標(biāo)日益迫切,農(nóng)戰(zhàn)史研究則遭遇了前所未有的冷漠。從學(xué)術(shù)自身發(fā)展的要求出發(fā),圍著意識形態(tài)轉(zhuǎn)的現(xiàn)象應(yīng)該得到改變。對于傳統(tǒng)的以階級斗爭為綱的農(nóng)戰(zhàn)史研究來說,今天是到了一個(gè)需要認(rèn)真回溯、總結(jié)、清理并使之終結(jié)的時(shí)代。但中國是一個(gè)傳統(tǒng)的農(nóng)業(yè)大國,幾千年的農(nóng)業(yè)社會一直延伸進(jìn)今天的時(shí)代,農(nóng)民問題、農(nóng)民的歷史和現(xiàn)狀,是我們認(rèn)識國情的最為重要的方面。所以,拋開以階級斗爭為綱的農(nóng)戰(zhàn)史和農(nóng)民問題研究、鄉(xiāng)村社會研究等等,仍是一個(gè)需要深入開掘的領(lǐng)域。所以,我們今天重提農(nóng)戰(zhàn)史研究,希望從新的歷史高度對之重新審視,用新的視角、新的方法和反思的精神,清理以往的研究,開拓新的思路,以期使被極度冷落的農(nóng)戰(zhàn)史研究,再次成為歷史研究的新的生長點(diǎn),并綻開出比傳統(tǒng)的“五朵金花”更為嬌艷、也更富有生命活力和科學(xué)魅力的史學(xué)鮮花。本期所選用的幾篇筆談短文,表達(dá)著編者對農(nóng)戰(zhàn)史研究復(fù)蘇和新生的熱切期待。
[Abstract]:Standing at the height of the new century, looking back on the study of Chinese history in the past hundred years, people will feel the obvious fact that people are too realistic about historical research and endow it with ideological characteristics. In the beginning of 0th century, under the influence of the Revolution of 1911, the study of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom flourished. In the 1920s and 1930s, the study of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom flourished. Nearly 30 books on the history of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom have been published, and for the first time in the history of Chinese historiography there have been highly concentrated academic topics. On the other hand, the study on the history of peasant war in the whole history of China has been raised to a considerable historical height. People simply regard the peasant war in history as a direct prelude to the real Chinese revolution; the study of the history of China after the founding of New China, Moreover, the study of the history of agricultural warfare was dressed up as a dazzling pearl. In 40 years, it published more than 4, 000 papers and more than 300 books, which has become a trend in the field of historical research. But after the middle of 80s, With the lack of mention of the problem of class struggle in real life, the rapid transition from an agricultural country to an industrial country, and the increasing urgency of the goal of establishing a stable social order, The research on the history of agricultural warfare has encountered unprecedented apathy. From the requirements of academic development itself, the phenomenon of turning around ideology should be changed. For the traditional research on the history of agricultural warfare based on class struggle, Today is an era that needs careful backtracking, summing up, cleaning up and putting an end to it. But China is a traditional agricultural country, and thousands of years of agricultural society have been extending into today's era, the problems of peasants, the history and present situation of peasants. This is the most important aspect of our understanding of the national conditions. Therefore, to put aside the history of agricultural warfare and the study of peasant issues, rural society, and so on, which is based on class struggle, is still an area that needs to be explored in depth. Today, we again bring up the study of the history of agricultural warfare. We hope to re-examine it from a new historical height, to use a new perspective, new methods and a spirit of reflection, to clean up past studies, and to open up new ideas, with a view to making the study of the history of agricultural warfare extremely neglected. Once again becoming a new growth point in the study of history, and blooming more beautiful than the traditional "five Golden Flowers", but also more vital and scientific charm of history flowers. Expressed the editor of the history of agricultural warfare research recovery and new expectations.
【作者單位】： 蘇州大學(xué)歷史系
【分類號】：K201

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 ;《水滸》的要害是宣揚(yáng)投降主義[J];河北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1975年01期

2 華金才;李逵之死告，

本文編號：1607708