本文選題：土地信托流轉(zhuǎn) + 模式�。� 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：自從改革開放以來,農(nóng)業(yè)的緩慢發(fā)展制約著我國(guó)高速的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展�！叭r(nóng)問題”是一直我國(guó)重點(diǎn)關(guān)注的問題之一。從2004到2015年,我國(guó)政府連續(xù)12年發(fā)布中央一號(hào)文件聚焦“三農(nóng)”問題,這足以說明我國(guó)對(duì)于農(nóng)業(yè)發(fā)展和改革的高度重視。實(shí)際上,“三農(nóng)問題”最根本的問題就是土地問題的解決。目前來看,我國(guó)老齡化問題日漸嚴(yán)重,農(nóng)村的勞動(dòng)力大量轉(zhuǎn)移到城鎮(zhèn),年輕的勞動(dòng)力不斷短缺,如今我國(guó)大部分的農(nóng)村地區(qū)剩下的勞動(dòng)力主要是老人和留守兒童,這便導(dǎo)致農(nóng)村土地拋荒現(xiàn)象日益嚴(yán)峻,土地產(chǎn)出率基本上是零,嚴(yán)重影響了農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)效率。傳統(tǒng)的小規(guī)模農(nóng)業(yè)發(fā)展現(xiàn)今已經(jīng)不能適應(yīng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展需求,土地經(jīng)營(yíng)的適度規(guī)模化已經(jīng)成為農(nóng)業(yè)規(guī)�；那疤�,而土地信托流轉(zhuǎn)就是在這種背景下應(yīng)運(yùn)而生。因此,為了更好地探索我國(guó)農(nóng)村的土地信托流轉(zhuǎn)模式,本文主要從以下幾個(gè)方面開展研究:首先,本文對(duì)土地信托流轉(zhuǎn)的基本概念進(jìn)行了一個(gè)明確的界定,并對(duì)其相關(guān)理論做出一個(gè)簡(jiǎn)單的概述。在此理論基礎(chǔ)上,本文從土地信托流轉(zhuǎn)模式的形成過程做了一個(gè)背景梳理,包括土地信托流轉(zhuǎn)的興起,土地信托流轉(zhuǎn)發(fā)展進(jìn)程以及我國(guó)主要土地信托流轉(zhuǎn)的模式的現(xiàn)狀,提出我國(guó)當(dāng)前土地信托流轉(zhuǎn)模式的形成經(jīng)歷一個(gè)發(fā)展階段,從土地信托流轉(zhuǎn)的萌芽在不斷成熟發(fā)展,其中紹興模式,益陽模式以及宿州模式分別是土地信托流轉(zhuǎn)不同發(fā)展階段中的典型代表模式。其次,通過比較分析我國(guó)這三種典型信托流轉(zhuǎn)模式,描述了土地信托流轉(zhuǎn)模式的基本運(yùn)行機(jī)制以及土地信托流轉(zhuǎn)帶來的績(jī)效影響。本文主要通過構(gòu)建一個(gè)績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)體系來量化土地信托流轉(zhuǎn)模式的績(jī)效。具體選取了12個(gè)績(jī)效評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)(經(jīng)濟(jì)績(jī)效指標(biāo)5個(gè),社會(huì)績(jī)效指標(biāo)4個(gè),生態(tài)績(jī)效指標(biāo)3個(gè)),運(yùn)用AHP分析法,得出選取的12個(gè)評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)各自所占的比重。結(jié)合案例分析,從經(jīng)濟(jì),社會(huì),生態(tài)三方面比較不同信托流轉(zhuǎn)模式的績(jī)效大小。最后,結(jié)論和建議。第一,三種典型的信托流轉(zhuǎn)模式試點(diǎn)運(yùn)行過程中會(huì)都會(huì)產(chǎn)生績(jī)效,;第二,三種土地信托流轉(zhuǎn)模式產(chǎn)生的經(jīng)濟(jì)績(jī)效是要大于社會(huì)績(jī)效和生態(tài)績(jī)效的,這意味著土地信托流轉(zhuǎn)模式更側(cè)重于農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展;第三,比較三種土地信托流轉(zhuǎn)模式,總體來看,在增進(jìn)農(nóng)民收入,宿州模式最優(yōu),益陽模式次之,紹興模式最差。最后,基于土地信托流轉(zhuǎn)模式的選擇,提出改善我國(guó)土地信托流轉(zhuǎn)的相關(guān)建議。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, the slow development of agriculture has restricted the rapid economic development of our country. The issue of agriculture, countryside and farmers is one of the most important problems in our country. From 2004 to 2015, our government issued the first document of the Central Committee for 12 years to focus on the issue of "agriculture, rural areas and farmers", which shows that our country attaches great importance to the agricultural development and reform. In fact, the most fundamental problem of the "three rural issues" is the solution of the land problem. At present, the aging problem in our country is getting more and more serious, the rural labor force has been transferred to cities and towns in a large number, and the young labor force is constantly in short supply. Today, the remaining labor force in most rural areas of our country is mainly the elderly and left-behind children. As a result, the phenomenon of land abandonment in rural areas is increasingly severe, and the output rate of land is basically zero, which seriously affects the efficiency of agricultural production. Traditional small-scale agricultural development has not been able to meet the needs of economic development, the moderate scale of land management has become the premise of agricultural scale, and land trust circulation is under this background. Therefore, in order to better explore the rural land trust transfer model, this paper mainly from the following aspects of research: first, this paper makes a clear definition of the basic concept of land trust circulation. And make a simple overview of its related theory. On the basis of this theory, this paper makes a background combing from the forming process of land trust circulation mode, including the rise of land trust circulation, the development process of land trust circulation and the present situation of the main land trust circulation mode in our country. It is pointed out that the formation of the current land trust circulation mode in China has experienced a stage of development, in which Shaoxing mode has been developed continuously from the germination of land trust circulation. Yiyang model and Suzhou model are typical models in different stages of land trust circulation. Secondly, through the comparative analysis of the three typical trust transfer models in China, this paper describes the basic operation mechanism of the land trust transfer model and the performance impact brought by the land trust transfer. This paper quantifies the performance of land trust circulation mode by constructing a performance evaluation system. This paper selects 12 performance evaluation indicators (5 economic performance indicators, 4 social performance indicators, 3 ecological performance indicators), and obtains the proportion of each of the 12 evaluation indicators by using AHP analysis method. Combined with case study, this paper compares the performance of different trust circulation models from three aspects: economy, society and ecology. Finally, conclusions and recommendations. First, the three typical trust transfer models will produce performance in the process of pilot operation; second, the economic performance of the three land trust transfer models is greater than social performance and ecological performance. This means that the transfer mode of land trust is more focused on the development of rural economy. Thirdly, comparing the three modes of land trust circulation, in general, in increasing farmers' income, Suzhou model is the best, Yiyang model is the second, Shaoxing model is the worst. Finally, based on the choice of land trust circulation mode, the paper puts forward some suggestions to improve land trust circulation in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F321.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 本報(bào)記者 李偉 通訊員 陳瑤 蔣寧;[N];益陽日?qǐng)?bào);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 蔣媛媛;紹興農(nóng)村土地信托制度的社會(huì)學(xué)解讀[D];南京師范大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1927787