【摘要】：博物館的概念最初由西方提出,博物館由人們心里潛在的收藏意識而來,到了今天,我國博物館在體制上主要分為公辦與民辦。隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,“文化立國”政策的出臺,廣大民眾生活水平的不斷提高,一些具有收藏基礎(chǔ)和經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)力的社會各界人士,紛紛通過創(chuàng)辦民辦博物館,來達(dá)到保護(hù)、傳承文化的內(nèi)心訴求,投身又一波的文化大潮中,因此各種各樣的民辦博物館如雨后春筍般出現(xiàn),也無可避免的出現(xiàn)了定位混亂、法律不完善、功能缺失等眾多問題。我國民辦博物館的開端大抵可以從改革開放算起,國外民辦博物館的發(fā)展時間更長,我們用由來已久的一般博物館學(xué)的思維去看民辦博物館,或是用一般博物館建設(shè)的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)來衡量在我國還是成長期的民辦博物館固然無錯,但也顯得不夠準(zhǔn)確,類似于選址、藏品收藏等問題自然要參考一般博物館學(xué)的建設(shè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),但提供一種更為準(zhǔn)確,更為人性的文化服務(wù)滿足目前受眾的文化需求,不離公益性文化事業(yè)這條主線的同時自謀出路,開展經(jīng)營性的文化活動,這種活動可以是“贏利”的,但絕不是我們一般看到的利用民辦博物館來進(jìn)行純粹的商業(yè)“營利”行為。而在民辦博物館文化服務(wù)經(jīng)營的過程當(dāng)中,或多或少都會涉及文化產(chǎn)業(yè)的諸多內(nèi)容,因此以事業(yè)扶持產(chǎn)業(yè),以產(chǎn)業(yè)支撐事業(yè),堅持創(chuàng)新為先的同時追根溯源,正本清源是我國民辦博物館從求救到自救的不二途徑。
[Abstract]:The concept of museum was first put forward by the west, and the museum came from people's latent consciousness of collection. Today, museums in our country are mainly divided into public and private ones. With the development of the economy, the introduction of the policy of "building a country by culture" and the continuous improvement of the living standards of the general public, some people from all walks of life who have the basis of collecting and economic strength have established private museums one after another to achieve protection. Inheriting the inner appeal of culture, join in another wave of cultural tide, so a variety of private museums sprang up like a spring rain, but also inevitably appeared in the confusion of positioning, imperfect law, lack of function and many other problems. The beginning of private museums in China can probably be reckoned from the beginning of reform and opening up, and the development of private museums in foreign countries has been even longer. We use our long-standing thinking of general museology to visit private museums. Or using the standard of general museum construction to measure that there is no mistake in the growing up of a private museum in our country, but it is also not accurate enough. Problems such as site selection, collection of collections, and so on, naturally have to refer to the construction standards of general museology. However, to provide a more accurate and more humane cultural service to meet the cultural needs of the current audience, and to find its own way out at the same time while the main line of public welfare cultural undertakings is the main line, to carry out profitable cultural activities, this kind of activity can be "profitable." But it is by no means the purely commercial "profit" that we see using private museums. In the process of cultural service management of private museums, many contents of cultural industry will be involved more or less. Therefore, to support the industry, to insist on innovation as the first step, and to trace back to the root of the industry at the same time. Qingyuan is the only way for private museums to save themselves.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南藝術(shù)學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G268.8

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 翁佳鈴;以畢爾包分館案例與臺中分館籌建案例解析古根海姆美術(shù)館的國際分館擴(kuò)張模式[D];中央美術(shù)學(xué)院;2007年

，

本文編號：2182246