本文關鍵詞：保薦制下承銷商聲譽與IPO企業(yè)質量研究　出處：《廈門大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關文章： 保薦制 承銷商聲譽機制 IPO企業(yè)

【摘要】：保薦制度自2004年在我國實施以來,至今已經(jīng)有十年,該制度有利于強化金融中介機構的“信息生產(chǎn)者”、“認證中介”的功能。日前證監(jiān)會正在竭力改革股市發(fā)行制度,加快從核準制過渡到注冊制,這對于證券市場的進一步市場化有積極的作用。我國股票市場成立時間不長,由于在發(fā)行環(huán)節(jié)中市場參與各方之間的利益沖突,因此股票發(fā)行環(huán)節(jié)是人們長期關注的焦點。本文將研究視角放在我國股票發(fā)行環(huán)節(jié)中的承銷商聲譽機制,考察在保薦制下承銷商聲譽與IPO企業(yè)經(jīng)營質量間的相關性,希望得出我國承銷商聲譽機制初步形成的結論,肯定保薦制度的引導規(guī)范作用。 本文運用文獻研究與實證分析相結合的方法,從理論到實證,分析我國承銷商的聲譽機制。在實證分析過程中,選取2009年7月至2010年12月我國市場發(fā)行的新股經(jīng)驗數(shù)據(jù)進行實證研究,重點考察承銷商聲譽與IPO企業(yè)上市當年和上市后兩年的經(jīng)營質量因子綜合得分間的相關性。先后選取描述性分析、單因素方差分析以及回歸分析這三種實證分析方法進行研究。描述性分析與單因素方差分析結果顯示第一級與第二級承銷商承銷企業(yè)的經(jīng)營狀況都較好不過差別不大,但兩者總體好于第三級承銷商承銷發(fā)行的企業(yè)；單變量回歸分析結果中聲譽系數(shù)通過顯著性檢驗,但總體擬合度不高,可以通過經(jīng)濟現(xiàn)象進行解釋。綜合實證分析結果,表明我國承銷商在保薦制度實施期間形成了聲譽機制的初步形態(tài),體現(xiàn)了保薦制度對于我國證券市場具有一定的規(guī)范引導作用。 研究結果顯示仍需更為明細的規(guī)章制度出臺,以加快完善我國承銷商聲譽機制。首先,需要政府提供更為公平優(yōu)質的生產(chǎn)資料,保障企業(yè)持續(xù)穩(wěn)定發(fā)展；其次,加快承銷商聲譽機制的建立,一方面要加強監(jiān)管,加大對于承銷商違法違規(guī)現(xiàn)象的懲處力度；另一方面,建立市場化的承銷商聲譽機制,使投資者在市場長期博弈過程中對承銷商形成準確評估；最后,完善配套機制,理順證券機構內保薦與承銷的職責,保障保薦制度的有效運行。
[Abstract]:Since 2004, the sponsor system has been implemented in China for ten years, which is conducive to strengthening the "information producers" of financial intermediaries. The former Securities Regulatory Commission is working hard to reform the stock market issuance system and speed up the transition from approval system to registration system. This will play a positive role in the further marketization of the securities market. The stock market in our country has not been established for a long time, because of the conflicts of interest between the parties involved in the issuing link. Therefore, the issue of stock is the focus of people's long-term concern. This paper focuses on the underwriter reputation mechanism in the issue of stock in China. This paper investigates the correlation between underwriter reputation and IPO business quality under the recommendation system, and hopes to draw the conclusion that the underwriter reputation mechanism of our country is formed preliminarily, and confirm the guiding and normative function of sponsor system. This paper uses the method of literature research and empirical analysis to analyze the reputation mechanism of underwriters in China from theory to demonstration. In the process of empirical analysis. From July 2009 to December 2010, the empirical data of new shares issued in China's market are selected for empirical research. The relationship between the reputation of underwriters and the comprehensive scores of business quality factors in the year and two years after the listing of IPO enterprises was investigated. The descriptive analysis was selected successively. The results of descriptive analysis and univariate ANOVA show that the first and second level underwriter underwriting enterprises are better, but the difference is different. Not really. But they are generally better than the third level underwriter underwriting and issuing enterprises; The results of univariate regression analysis showed that the reputation coefficient passed the significance test, but the overall fitting degree was not high, which could be explained by economic phenomena. It shows that the underwriters in our country have formed the initial form of reputation mechanism during the implementation of the sponsorship system, which reflects the role of the sponsorship system in guiding the securities market in China to a certain extent. The results show that more detailed rules and regulations are needed in order to improve the reputation mechanism of underwriters in China. Firstly, the government needs to provide more fair and high-quality means of production to ensure the sustainable and stable development of enterprises; Secondly, to speed up the establishment of the underwriter reputation mechanism, on the one hand, to strengthen supervision and increase the penalties for underwriters illegal phenomenon; On the other hand, the establishment of market-oriented underwriter reputation mechanism, so that investors in the market long-term game process to form an accurate evaluation of the underwriter; Finally, perfect the supporting mechanism, straighten out the responsibility of recommendation and underwriting in securities institutions, and ensure the effective operation of recommendation system.
【學位授予單位】：廈門大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F832.51;F272.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 曾康霖;簡論金融中介學說的發(fā)展軌跡[J];財經(jīng)科學;2001年04期

2 盧文彬,朱紅軍;IPO公司經(jīng)營業(yè)績變動與股權結構研究[J];財經(jīng)研究;2001年07期

3 劉江會;;可信性、價值認證和投資銀行聲譽機制[J];財經(jīng)研究;2007年09期

4 張海云;徐春波;;承銷商聲譽與IPO企業(yè)質量關系的實證分析——基于我國A股市場的數(shù)據(jù)[J];財會通訊;2009年24期

5 劉誼,劉星,劉斌;股權結構對股票首次公開發(fā)行公司經(jīng)營業(yè)績變動的影響分析[J];財經(jīng)理論與實踐;2004年04期

6 劉江會,尹伯成,易行健;我國證券承銷商聲譽與IPO企業(yè)質量關系的實證分析[J];財貿經(jīng)濟;2005年03期

7 彭文平,肖繼輝;新金融中介理論述評[J];當代財經(jīng);2002年02期

8 余津津;現(xiàn)代西方聲譽理論述評[J];當代財經(jīng);2003年11期

9 沈家,涂慧敏;承銷商信譽排名的方法研究[J];復旦學報(自然科學版);2003年05期

10 高樹棠;李曉芳;;承銷商聲譽與IPO抑價關系的實證研究[J];福建商業(yè)高等�？茖W校學報;2011年04期

，

本文編號：1433774