本文關(guān)鍵詞：基于居民調(diào)查的北京市保障性住房公共服務(wù)設(shè)施研究　出處：《清華大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 保障性住房 公共服務(wù)設(shè)施 居民滿意度

【摘要】：近年來(lái)，北京市進(jìn)行了大規(guī)模、快速的保障性住房建設(shè)以應(yīng)對(duì)城市中低收入家庭的住房需求，其中建樹與問題并存。當(dāng)前正值北京市保障性住房發(fā)展建設(shè)承上啟下的關(guān)鍵時(shí)期，有必要及時(shí)對(duì)以往保障性住房工作進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)梳理、發(fā)現(xiàn)問題并提出應(yīng)對(duì)策略，為日后的住房保障工作提供借鑒。 公共服務(wù)設(shè)施與民生息息相關(guān)，本文以保障性住房公共服務(wù)設(shè)施配置水平為切入點(diǎn)，對(duì)北京市保障性住房規(guī)劃建設(shè)效果進(jìn)行實(shí)證評(píng)估，既符合以人為本的新型城鎮(zhèn)化的具體要求，亦呼應(yīng)了當(dāng)前社會(huì)各界所關(guān)注的熱點(diǎn)問題。 本文在梳理北京市保障性住房建設(shè)實(shí)際情況的基礎(chǔ)上，對(duì)北京市典型保障性住房進(jìn)行實(shí)證研究，選取北京市2007年后開工建設(shè)的典型保障性住房項(xiàng)目（瑞旗家園、蘇家坨同澤園及唐家?guī)X新城）為實(shí)證研究對(duì)象，采用實(shí)地觀察和訪談?wù){(diào)查等研究方法，對(duì)保障性住房公共服務(wù)設(shè)施配置現(xiàn)狀、居民需求特征及居住滿意度等進(jìn)行調(diào)查分析。研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，保障性住房居民對(duì)公共服務(wù)設(shè)施的需求及滿意度存在主觀差異（受到居民年齡及健康狀況、家庭生命周期、家庭收入及消費(fèi)水平、入住前居住條件等方面的影響）；但整體來(lái)說，對(duì)居民滿意度評(píng)價(jià)影響最大的因素為公共服務(wù)設(shè)施的便利性、經(jīng)濟(jì)性和服務(wù)質(zhì)量。 以宏觀梳理及微觀調(diào)查為基礎(chǔ)，筆者從“質(zhì)”和“量”兩個(gè)角度、“城市”與“住區(qū)”兩個(gè)層面分析了保障性住房公共服務(wù)設(shè)施的配置問題及相關(guān)制約因素，，指出近年北京市保障性住房公共服務(wù)設(shè)施配問題包括：規(guī)劃設(shè)計(jì)“低標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”、建設(shè)實(shí)施“不到位”、建后運(yùn)營(yíng)管理“脫節(jié)”，公共服務(wù)設(shè)施可達(dá)性差、數(shù)量不足、服務(wù)水平有限、收費(fèi)不合理等；制約保障性住房項(xiàng)目公共服務(wù)設(shè)施發(fā)展的因素包括：相關(guān)規(guī)范缺乏針對(duì)性、開發(fā)逐利與政府監(jiān)管漏洞、規(guī)劃選址與城市關(guān)系割裂、大規(guī)模快速建設(shè)存在弊端、公共服務(wù)設(shè)施配置存在程式化缺陷。最后，筆者以“公平有效”及“適度保障”為目標(biāo)，以“以人為本”、“資源共享”、“系統(tǒng)化”和“彈性發(fā)展”為基本原則，對(duì)已建保障性住房公共服務(wù)設(shè)施現(xiàn)存問題提出較為務(wù)實(shí)的調(diào)整建議，包括查缺補(bǔ)漏、功能復(fù)合、優(yōu)先應(yīng)急和招商引導(dǎo)；并對(duì)北京市未來(lái)保障性住房公共服務(wù)設(shè)施配置提出展望：筆者基于對(duì)保障性住房規(guī)劃建設(shè)“程序”的理解，提出北京市未來(lái)住房保障工作的優(yōu)化構(gòu)想，即“以人為本”地調(diào)整保障性住房公共服務(wù)設(shè)施配建“程序”、將人文關(guān)懷貫穿于保障性住房規(guī)劃建設(shè)全過程。
[Abstract]:In recent years, Beijing has carried out large-scale, rapid construction of affordable housing to meet the housing needs of low-income families in the city. Construction and problems coexist. At present, the construction of affordable housing construction in Beijing is a crucial period, it is necessary to sort out the past housing work systematically, find the problems and put forward countermeasures. For the future housing security work to provide reference. Public service facilities are closely related to people's livelihood. This paper takes the allocation level of public service facilities of affordable housing as a starting point to make an empirical evaluation of the effect of the construction of affordable housing planning in Beijing. It is not only in line with the specific requirements of people-oriented new urbanization, but also in response to the current hot issues concerned by all walks of life. On the basis of combing the actual situation of housing construction in Beijing, this paper makes an empirical study on typical affordable housing in Beijing. Select the typical affordable housing projects (Ruiqi homeland, Sujiatuo Tongze Garden and Tangjialing New Town) which started construction after 2007 in Beijing as the empirical research object, and adopt the field observation and interview investigation and other research methods. The present situation of the public service facilities allocation, the characteristics of residents' needs and the satisfaction degree of the residents are investigated and analyzed. There are subjective differences in the demand for and satisfaction with public service facilities (by age and health status, family life cycle, household income and consumption level). The influence of living conditions before occupancy; But on the whole, the most influential factors to the evaluation of residents' satisfaction are the convenience, economy and service quality of the public service facilities. On the basis of macroscopical combing and micro investigation, the author analyzes the allocation of public service facilities of affordable housing from the two aspects of "quality" and "quantity", "city" and "residential area". It is pointed out that in recent years, the problems in the allocation of public service facilities of the affordable housing in Beijing include: low standard in planning and design, "not in place" in construction, "disconnection" in operation management after construction, and poor accessibility of public service facilities. The quantity is insufficient, the service level is limited, the charge is unreasonable and so on; The factors that restrict the development of public service facilities of affordable housing projects include the lack of pertinence of relevant norms, the loopholes of development and government supervision, the separation of the relationship between planning location and cities, and the drawbacks of large-scale and rapid construction. Finally, the author aims at "fair and effective" and "moderate security", "people-oriented" and "resource sharing". "systematization" and "flexible development" as the basic principles, put forward some practical suggestions to the existing problems of the public service facilities of the built affordable housing, including checking and filling gaps, function compound, priority emergency and investment guidance; And put forward the prospect of the public service facilities allocation of the future supportable housing in Beijing: based on the understanding of the "procedure" of the planning and construction of the supportable housing, the author puts forward the optimization conception of the housing security work in the future of Beijing. That is to say, "people first" adjusts the "procedure" of the construction of the public service facilities of the indemnificatory housing, and runs through the whole process of the planning and construction of the indemnificatory housing.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：清華大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F299.23

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 住房保障體系研究課題組;;北京市城鎮(zhèn)居民住房保障體系研究[J];數(shù)據(jù);2011年02期

2 高曉路;;居住環(huán)境的價(jià)值化評(píng)價(jià)及其實(shí)踐意義[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2010年02期

3 宋偉軒;;大城市保障性住房空間布局的社會(huì)問題與治理途徑[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2011年08期

4 劉佳燕;陳振華;王鵬;王健;;北京新城公共設(shè)施規(guī)劃中的思考[J];城市規(guī)劃;2006年04期

5 張娟;;美國(guó)包容性區(qū)劃對(duì)我國(guó)保障性住房建設(shè)的啟示[J];城市規(guī)劃;2011年09期

6 袁奇峰;馬曉亞;;保障性住區(qū)的公共服務(wù)設(shè)施供給——以廣州市為例[J];城市規(guī)劃;2012年02期

7 顧鳴東;尹海偉;;公共設(shè)施空間可達(dá)性與公平性研究概述[J];城市問題;2010年05期

8 張大維;陳偉東;李雪萍;孔娜娜;;城市社區(qū)公共服務(wù)設(shè)施規(guī)劃標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與實(shí)施單元研究——以武漢市為例[J];城市規(guī)劃學(xué)刊;2006年03期

9 何芳;李曉麗;;保障性社區(qū)公共服務(wù)設(shè)施供需特征及滿意度因子的實(shí)證研究——以上海市寶山區(qū)顧村鎮(zhèn)“四高小區(qū)”為例[J];城市規(guī)劃學(xué)刊;2010年04期

10 李平華,陸玉麒;可達(dá)性研究的回顧與展望[J];地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2005年03期

本文編號(hào)：1430426