基于RPSCP框架下我國(guó)民航業(yè)政府規(guī)制改革績(jī)效研究
本文選題:RPSCP + 民航業(yè)。 參考:《吉林大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文
【摘要】:目前,我國(guó)正處在市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)體制逐漸成熟的時(shí)期。我國(guó)自然壟斷性行業(yè)一直伴隨著市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)體制的深化改革,己成為社會(huì)各界關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn)。民航業(yè)不僅僅是國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)的重要組成部分,而且在一定程度上關(guān)系著國(guó)家安全。民航業(yè)的發(fā)展直接影響到國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展?fàn)顩r,因此,我國(guó)民航業(yè)在國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)運(yùn)行過(guò)程中居于基礎(chǔ)性、戰(zhàn)略先導(dǎo)性等重要地位。 中國(guó)民航業(yè)是較早進(jìn)行放松規(guī)制、市場(chǎng)化改革的產(chǎn)業(yè)之一。自改革開放以來(lái),中國(guó)民航業(yè)在打破政府壟斷、引入競(jìng)爭(zhēng)方面取得了一定的成效,,多家民營(yíng)航空公司相繼進(jìn)入民航市場(chǎng),民營(yíng)航空公司從無(wú)到有、從小到大,市場(chǎng)占有率也不斷提高,但在航線準(zhǔn)入、航班時(shí)間的安排方面與大航空公司的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力較弱,小型航空公司試圖用價(jià)格戰(zhàn)挽回頹勢(shì),但效果似乎不盡人意。 本文運(yùn)用理論分析和實(shí)證分析相結(jié)合的方法,結(jié)合我國(guó)對(duì)民航業(yè)的規(guī)制歷程分析規(guī)制改革績(jī)效,運(yùn)用比較分析的方法,結(jié)合我國(guó)的實(shí)際國(guó)情,將我國(guó)民航業(yè)的發(fā)展和政府規(guī)制現(xiàn)狀與美國(guó)等發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家比較,發(fā)現(xiàn)了產(chǎn)業(yè)組織理論SCP基本框架在我國(guó)民航產(chǎn)業(yè)組織研究中存在的問(wèn)題和局限性,融合規(guī)制理論和產(chǎn)權(quán)理論,提出了民航產(chǎn)業(yè)組織的RPSCP(規(guī)制制度-產(chǎn)權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)-市場(chǎng)結(jié)構(gòu)-市場(chǎng)行為-市場(chǎng)績(jī)效)框架,將政府規(guī)制改革與新的產(chǎn)業(yè)組織理論框架結(jié)合起來(lái)進(jìn)行研究,從兩者互動(dòng)的角度解釋政府規(guī)制的改革進(jìn)程,并在此框架下對(duì)我國(guó)民航業(yè)規(guī)制改革的績(jī)效進(jìn)行實(shí)證檢驗(yàn),建立多元線性回歸模型,利用民航業(yè)1990年至2010年的時(shí)間序列數(shù)據(jù),將政府規(guī)制(Regulation)、產(chǎn)權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)(Property)、市場(chǎng)結(jié)構(gòu)(Structure)等變量對(duì)反映規(guī)制改革績(jī)效的運(yùn)輸總量、機(jī)票價(jià)格、利潤(rùn)水平、服務(wù)質(zhì)量指標(biāo)進(jìn)行實(shí)證檢驗(yàn),實(shí)證結(jié)果表明: (1)民航業(yè)規(guī)制制度的放松與運(yùn)輸總量顯著正相關(guān),與利潤(rùn)水平、服務(wù)質(zhì)量顯著負(fù)相關(guān),而規(guī)制制度的放松對(duì)機(jī)票價(jià)格的變化沒(méi)有顯著作用。 (2)民航業(yè)國(guó)有產(chǎn)權(quán)比率與運(yùn)輸總量、機(jī)票價(jià)格、利潤(rùn)水平顯著正相關(guān),國(guó)有產(chǎn)權(quán)比率與服務(wù)質(zhì)量顯著負(fù)相關(guān)。 (3)民航業(yè)市場(chǎng)集中度(CR3)與機(jī)票價(jià)格顯著正相關(guān),市場(chǎng)集中度(CR3)與利潤(rùn)水平、服務(wù)質(zhì)量顯著負(fù)相關(guān),而對(duì)運(yùn)輸總量沒(méi)有顯著作用。 本文還分析了民航業(yè)在當(dāng)前經(jīng)濟(jì)周期中發(fā)展的其它影響因素,其中包括規(guī)制政策、航油價(jià)格、高鐵以及人民幣持續(xù)升值的影響,民航業(yè)面臨的機(jī)遇和挑戰(zhàn)并存。最后,結(jié)合我國(guó)民航業(yè)的實(shí)際情況,提出相關(guān)政策建議:加強(qiáng)制度體系建設(shè),提高規(guī)制質(zhì)量;建立健全規(guī)制制度,優(yōu)化競(jìng)爭(zhēng)機(jī)制;適當(dāng)調(diào)整產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu),深化產(chǎn)權(quán)改革;提高網(wǎng)絡(luò)結(jié)構(gòu)效率,強(qiáng)化國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)。
[Abstract]:At present, our country is in the market economy system gradually mature period. With the deepening reform of the market economy system, the natural monopoly industry has become the focus of attention. Civil aviation is not only an important part of national economy, but also relates to national security to some extent. The development of civil aviation industry has a direct impact on the development of the national economy. Therefore, the civil aviation industry of our country plays an important role in the operation of the national economy. China's civil aviation industry is an early deregulation, market-oriented reform of one of the industries. Since the reform and opening up, China's civil aviation industry has achieved certain results in breaking the government monopoly and introducing competition. Many private airlines have entered the civil aviation market one after another. Market share is also growing, but in route access, flight scheduling with the major airlines are less competitive, small airlines trying to use price war to reverse the decline, but the effect seems to be unsatisfactory. This paper uses the method of combining theoretical analysis and empirical analysis, combined with the regulation process of China's civil aviation industry to analyze the performance of regulatory reform, using the method of comparative analysis, combined with the actual situation of our country. Comparing the development of China's civil aviation industry and the current situation of government regulation with the developed countries such as the United States, this paper finds out the problems and limitations of SCP basic framework in the study of civil aviation industry organization in China, and combines the theory of regulation with the theory of property rights. The RPSCP framework of civil aviation industry organization is put forward, which combines the government regulation reform with the new industrial organization theory framework. This paper explains the reform process of government regulation from the angle of interaction between the two, and makes an empirical test on the performance of civil aviation regulation reform in this framework, establishes a multivariate linear regression model, and makes use of the time series data of civil aviation industry from 1990 to 2010. The government regulation (regulation), property (property), market structure (structure) and other variables to reflect the performance of regulatory reform of the total transport, ticket prices, profit levels, service quality indicators for empirical testing, The empirical results show that: (1) the relaxation of civil aviation regulation system is significantly positively correlated with the total transport volume, negatively correlated with the profit level and service quality. However, the relaxation of regulation system has no significant effect on the change of air ticket price. (2) the ratio of state-owned property right in civil aviation industry is significantly positively related to the total amount of transportation, ticket price and profit level. (3) Civil aviation market concentration (CR3) has a significant positive correlation with air ticket price, while market concentration (CR3) is negatively correlated with profit level and service quality, but has no significant effect on total transportation. This paper also analyzes other factors that influence the development of civil aviation industry in the current economic cycle, including regulation policy, aviation oil price, high-speed rail and the impact of RMB continuous appreciation. The opportunities and challenges of civil aviation industry exist side by side. Finally, according to the actual situation of China's civil aviation industry, the paper puts forward some relevant policy suggestions: strengthening the system construction, improving the regulation quality, establishing and perfecting the regulation system, optimizing the competition mechanism, adjusting the industrial structure appropriately, deepening the property right reform; Improve the efficiency of network structure and strengthen international competition.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類號(hào)】:F562
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 呂斌;;王明雯:民航業(yè)制度亟待完善[J];法人;2011年07期
2 王曉;;我國(guó)民航業(yè)發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀及前景分析[J];國(guó)有資產(chǎn)管理;2010年01期
3 王志剛;;“京滬高鐵”或?qū)⑼苿?dòng)民航業(yè)開創(chuàng)發(fā)展新境界[J];空運(yùn)商務(wù);2011年14期
4 ;艾默生綠色數(shù)據(jù)中心解決方案助力民航業(yè)“騰飛”[J];電源世界;2011年07期
5 程凌;;夯實(shí)建設(shè)民航強(qiáng)國(guó)“地基” 看行業(yè)文化建設(shè)[J];中國(guó)民用航空;2011年06期
6 張進(jìn);;展望中國(guó)民航業(yè)新十年[J];國(guó)際航空;2010年06期
7 楊文鋒;;TQM與SMS的內(nèi)涵與聯(lián)系[J];中國(guó)民用航空;2011年06期
8 康文生;黃偉宏;;民航華北局探索京滬航線與高鐵競(jìng)合雙贏新途徑[J];空運(yùn)商務(wù);2011年12期
9 蘇寧;;合作應(yīng)對(duì)挑戰(zhàn) 轉(zhuǎn)變助推發(fā)展[J];中國(guó)民用航空;2011年05期
10 ;媒體集萃[J];中國(guó)民用航空;2011年05期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條
1 趙兵;;試論機(jī)場(chǎng)信息安全風(fēng)險(xiǎn)和防護(hù)對(duì)策[A];安全責(zé)任 重在落實(shí)——第四屆吉林安全生產(chǎn)論壇論文集[C];2011年
2 祖若s
本文編號(hào):2075685
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/jtysjj/2075685.html