本文關(guān)鍵詞： 制造業(yè) 技術(shù)創(chuàng)新 索洛余值 非參數(shù)Malmquist法 制度激勵 技術(shù)創(chuàng)新網(wǎng)絡(luò)　出處：《福建師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：本文以步入中等收入階段的我國制造業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新貢獻(xiàn)率為研究標(biāo)的,利用基于C-D生產(chǎn)函數(shù)的索洛余值法和非參數(shù)Malmquist指數(shù)法,對我國2001-2011年的制造業(yè)數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行實(shí)證分析,結(jié)果顯示我國制造業(yè)產(chǎn)出的資本彈性為0.69,要大大高于產(chǎn)出的勞動彈性0.31,說明我國制造業(yè)人力資源的積累緩慢,勞動力資源的利用效率較低；測算、分解我國制造業(yè)全要素生產(chǎn)率,發(fā)現(xiàn)技術(shù)效率長期拖累著技術(shù)進(jìn)步對產(chǎn)出增長的貢獻(xiàn)率,導(dǎo)致技術(shù)創(chuàng)新對我國制造業(yè)產(chǎn)出增長的貢獻(xiàn)率僅為45.58%,說明我國制造業(yè)仍舊處于要素驅(qū)動的粗放增長階段。 借助實(shí)證分析和與日、韓等先進(jìn)制造業(yè)國家的對比結(jié)果,可知我國制造業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動力較弱,制造業(yè)各子行業(yè)間的知識和技術(shù)擴(kuò)散效應(yīng)雖較顯著,但整體知識和技術(shù)層次較低,制造業(yè)整體質(zhì)、量發(fā)展不協(xié)調(diào),與創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動的發(fā)展模式差距甚遠(yuǎn)。針對我國制造業(yè)存在的問題,要順利地推動其轉(zhuǎn)型升級,跨入創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動的發(fā)展階段,至少需采取以下幾個(gè)措施：第一,推動技術(shù)進(jìn)步與技術(shù)效率協(xié)同共進(jìn)；第二,增加技術(shù)創(chuàng)新資源投入；第三,營造良好的自主創(chuàng)新制度環(huán)境；第四,培育戰(zhàn)略新興產(chǎn)業(yè)；第五,構(gòu)建制造業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新網(wǎng)絡(luò)。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the contribution rate of Chinese manufacturing technology innovation into the middle income stage is taken as the research object, and the Solow residual value method based on C-D production function and the non-parametric Malmquist index method are used. The empirical analysis of China's manufacturing data from 2001 to 2011 shows that the capital elasticity of manufacturing output is 0.69, which is much higher than the labor elasticity of output 0.31. It shows that the accumulation of human resources in manufacturing industry is slow and the utilization efficiency of labor resources is low. By measuring and decomposing the total factor productivity of our manufacturing industry, we find that technical efficiency is a long-term drag on the contribution of technological progress to output growth. The contribution rate of technological innovation to the output growth of Chinese manufacturing industry is only 45.58, which indicates that the manufacturing industry in China is still in the extensive growth stage driven by factors. With the help of empirical analysis and comparative results with Japan, Korea and other advanced manufacturing countries, we can see that the driving force of technological innovation in manufacturing industry is weak, and the diffusion effect of knowledge and technology among sub-industries of manufacturing industry is significant. However, the overall level of knowledge and technology is low, the overall quality and quantity of the manufacturing industry is not coordinated, and is far from the innovation-driven development model. In view of the problems existing in the manufacturing industry in China, it is necessary to promote its transformation and upgrading smoothly. To step into the stage of innovation-driven development, at least the following measures should be taken: first, to promote technological progress and technological efficiency; Second, increase the input of technological innovation resources; Third, to create a good independent innovation system environment; 4th, cultivate strategic emerging industries; 5th, build manufacturing technology innovation network.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福建師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F224;F424.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 王欣;龐玉蘭;;裝備制造業(yè)全要素生產(chǎn)率動態(tài)測度[J];安徽工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2011年02期

2 吳進(jìn)紅;蔣蘭陵;;江蘇制造業(yè)的資本深化與技術(shù)進(jìn)步[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2010年04期

3 王應(yīng)明;徐南榮;;C-D生產(chǎn)函數(shù)參數(shù)估計(jì)的改進(jìn)算法[J];東南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1991年03期

4 董祥海,李升;C—D生產(chǎn)函數(shù)的一種改進(jìn)模型[J];大眾科技;2004年10期

5 杜偉,韓冰;技術(shù)創(chuàng)新制度激勵的思想探源與政策分析[J];四川師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2002年02期

6 許慶瑞,吳曉波;技術(shù)創(chuàng)新、勞動生產(chǎn)率與產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;1991年12期

7 劉朋;謝幸;董海濤;;貴州省工業(yè)全要素生產(chǎn)率的測算:1979—2009[J];貴州商業(yè)高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2011年03期

，

本文編號：1457709