發(fā)布時間：2018-01-22 19:51

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè) 研發(fā)效率 區(qū)域分析 數(shù)據(jù)包絡分析法　出處：《天津商業(yè)大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)是國家作為促進科技進步和技術(shù)創(chuàng)新、轉(zhuǎn)變經(jīng)濟發(fā)展模式、加快科技事業(yè)迅猛發(fā)展、促進經(jīng)濟的可持續(xù)增長的發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略。在目前，我國處于經(jīng)濟結(jié)構(gòu)轉(zhuǎn)型，產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化升級的戰(zhàn)略性調(diào)整階段。這就表明，，戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)將作為我國保持經(jīng)濟持續(xù)穩(wěn)定增長的戰(zhàn)略選擇，如何支持戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的快速高質(zhì)的發(fā)展是金融危機以來我國突破發(fā)展瓶頸，創(chuàng)造綠色經(jīng)濟的重中之重。 戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)，具有戰(zhàn)略性和新興性的特征，兼具“整體性、長期性、引導性、動態(tài)性”等特點的新興產(chǎn)業(yè)。對經(jīng)濟和社會具有整體牽頭帶動和重大引導作用。產(chǎn)業(yè)要能帶動一批相關(guān)產(chǎn)業(yè)和產(chǎn)品的興起，促進產(chǎn)業(yè)的上下游已經(jīng)相關(guān)的產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈迅猛發(fā)展，帶來一定的經(jīng)濟效益。對于戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的出現(xiàn)一般大致可以歸于兩個原因：1.經(jīng)濟危機催發(fā)新科學技術(shù)革命。2.20世紀六大科學技術(shù)的突破。戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)就必然要符合衡量引導產(chǎn)業(yè)的主要標準和條件：對整體國民經(jīng)濟的杰出貢獻。一般來說，這種引導產(chǎn)業(yè)的貢獻主要體現(xiàn)在三個層面：獲利能力、吸納就業(yè)能力以及對其它產(chǎn)業(yè)的相關(guān)影響力度。戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展具有以下規(guī)律：1.“科學發(fā)現(xiàn)-技術(shù)發(fā)明-產(chǎn)業(yè)化”是戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)成長發(fā)展的基本途徑。2.國際化成為戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的必然結(jié)果。3.人才的集聚化是戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的一般形態(tài)和規(guī)律。4.政策的引導具有帶動作用。產(chǎn)業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新聯(lián)盟是戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展有效組織形式，高新區(qū)作為戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)的主要承載。我國戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)缺乏核心技術(shù)支撐，存在"中國制造”路徑依賴，其商業(yè)化是制約戰(zhàn)略新興產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的瓶頸，并且我國的機構(gòu)現(xiàn)行制度不能適應戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)又快又好的發(fā)展。在融資體系方面，很多新興產(chǎn)業(yè)規(guī)模小，重技術(shù)而輕資產(chǎn)，致使缺乏可抵押的資產(chǎn)，間接融資渠道受阻，而天使投資缺失，風險投資專業(yè)水平不高。在配套政策方面，審批制度也不盡規(guī)范。 本文通過數(shù)據(jù)包絡分析和主成分分析等實證分析模型，按照具有目標導向性、全面系統(tǒng)性、可比性原則、客觀實用性、相對性原則等的選取原則進行對指標的選取，并從實證的全面性、合理性、客觀性以及數(shù)據(jù)的可得性等方面綜合考慮，按區(qū)域為單位，對我國30個省市進行實證分析，選取的數(shù)據(jù)進行標準化處理后，進行主成分提取，模型回歸后對效率進行分級，分為研發(fā)效率低區(qū)，研發(fā)效率中區(qū)，研發(fā)效率高區(qū)。效率低區(qū)包括：河北、內(nèi)蒙古、四川、陜西、新疆、海南、重慶、遼寧、吉林、湖北、黑龍江、安徽、江西、湖南、廣西、河南、青海、甘肅；效率中區(qū)包括：天津、山東、山西、浙江、福建、貴州、云南；效率高區(qū)包括：北京、上海、江蘇、廣東、寧夏。針對得到的模型回歸結(jié)果，分別從研發(fā)效率、投影、投入冗余產(chǎn)出不足三個層面，對我國30個省市的研發(fā)效率狀況進行了分析及比較。通過分析比較發(fā)現(xiàn)得出，導致我國戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)研發(fā)效率區(qū)域差異形成的原因主要有三個:首先，區(qū)域經(jīng)濟發(fā)展水平的高低是研發(fā)效率區(qū)域形成高中低區(qū)不同的根本原因，經(jīng)濟發(fā)展格局的不盡相同，也是產(chǎn)生研發(fā)效率差異的原因所在；第二，區(qū)位條件是研發(fā)效率區(qū)域形成高中低區(qū)不同的重要因素，相對而言，在東南沿海地帶的研發(fā)效率高一些，而在中西部和東北地區(qū)，大部分省市和地區(qū)的研發(fā)效率水平都不是很高。第三，研發(fā)人才素質(zhì)及結(jié)構(gòu)是否高效合理，是研發(fā)效率區(qū)域形成高中低區(qū)不同差異的基礎。本文通過實證結(jié)果的分析，提出了分別針對研發(fā)效率高區(qū)、研發(fā)效率中區(qū)和研發(fā)效率低區(qū)如何提高本區(qū)域戰(zhàn)略性新興產(chǎn)業(yè)研發(fā)效率的對策建議。
[Abstract]:The development of strategic emerging industries is the country as to promote scientific and technological progress and technological innovation, changing the mode of economic development, accelerate science and technology rapid development, the development of strategies to promote sustainable economic growth. At present, our country is in the transformation of the economic structure, strategic adjustment stage of the optimization and upgrading of industrial structure. It shows that, as China's strategic emerging industry the strategic choice to keep the economy sustained and stable growth, rapid and high quality how to support the development of strategic emerging industry is the financial crisis in China to break the bottleneck of development, create a priority among priorities of the green economy.
Strategic emerging industry, strategic and emerging features, both "holistic, long-term, leading, emerging industry dynamic characteristics". With the overall lead drive and major guiding role on economy and society. The industry to be able to drive the rise of a number of related industries and products, promote downstream industries have the rapid development of the industrial chain, bring certain economic benefits. In general can be attributed to two reasons for strategic emerging industries: 1. economic crisis precipitated by new revolution in science and technology.2.20 six century science and technology breakthrough. Strategic emerging industries must conform to standard and guide the main measure of industry conditions: outstanding contribution to the whole national economy. In general, the leading industry's contribution is mainly manifested in three aspects: profitability, ability to absorb employment and other industries are Close the impact. The development of strategic emerging industries has the following rules: 1. "scientific discoveries - technology - industrialization" is the development of strategic emerging industries basic way.2. internationalization has become a inevitable result of the development of strategic emerging industries in the agglomeration of.3. talent is the general shape and rule of the development of strategic emerging industries in the.4. policy has driven role of industrial technology innovation alliance is the development of an effective organization form of strategic emerging industries, high-tech zones as a strategic emerging industry. The main bearing of China's strategic emerging industries, the lack of core technical support, the existence of "Chinese manufacturing" path dependence, its commercialization is a bottleneck restricting the development of strategic emerging industries, and the current system can not be in China mechanism to adapt to the development of strategic emerging industries quickly and well. In the financing system, many emerging industries in small scale technology However, light assets lead to lack of collateralized assets, and indirect financing channels are blocked. However, the lack of angel investment and the professional level of venture capital are not high. In supporting policies, the examination and approval system is also not standardized.
This paper through empirical data envelopment analysis and principal component analysis model, according to the goal oriented, systematic, comparability principle, objective and practical, the selection of indicators of selection principle of relativity principle, and from the comprehensive, empirical rationality, objectivity and the data can be considered so, according to the region as a unit, the empirical analysis of 30 provinces and cities in China, standardized processing of the selected data, extract the principal components regression model, after classifying efficiency, divided into low area development efficiency, development efficiency of central region. The efficiency of research and development including low efficiency area: Hebei, Inner Mongolia Sichuan, Shaanxi, Xinjiang, Hainan, Chongqing, Liaoning, Jilin, Hubei, Heilongjiang, Anhui, Jiangxi, Hunan, Guangxi, Henan, Qinghai, Gansu, central Tianjin, including: efficiency; Shandong, Shanxi, Zhejiang, Fujian, Guizhou, Yunnan; efficiency The area includes: Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Guangdong, Ningxia. According to the regression results obtained respectively from the model, the research efficiency, projection, redundant input output of less than three levels, the efficiency of research and development status of 30 provinces in China were analyzed and compared. Through the analysis and comparison of the obtained result, there are three main reasons the formation of China's strategic emerging industry research and development efficiency of regional differences: first, the regional economic development level is the fundamental reason of different high schools and low efficiency of Regional R & D formation of the pattern of economic development is not the same, it is the reason of development efficiency differences; second, location is an important factor in the formation of different areas, low high school the relative efficiency of Regional R & D, R & D in the southeast coastal areas with high efficiency, and in the Midwest and northeast regions, R & D efficiency level of most provinces and regions are not very high. Third, the quality and structure of talent development is reasonable and efficient, is the basic research and development efficiency of regional differences form low area high school. In this paper, through the analysis of the empirical results, put forward respectively for R & D efficiency high, central research and countermeasures research efficiency low efficiency area of how to improve the regional strategic emerging industry research and development efficiency.

【學位授予單位】：天津商業(yè)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F224;F276.44

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 黃永興;張國慶;;安徽省高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新效率研究[J];安徽工業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2007年06期

2 鄧路;高連水;;研發(fā)投入、行業(yè)內(nèi)R&D溢出與自主創(chuàng)新效率——基于中國高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)的面板數(shù)據(jù)(1999—2007)[J];財貿(mào)研究;2009年05期

3 路永明;;基于DEA的我國高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)科技投入產(chǎn)出效率評價[J];經(jīng)濟師;2008年03期

4 劉俊杰;傅毓維;;基于DEA方法的高技術(shù)企業(yè)創(chuàng)新效率研究[J];科技管理研究;2008年03期

5 鄭循剛;;基于DEA的我國高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)R&D效率評價[J];四川農(nóng)業(yè)大學學報;2009年03期

6 王雙盈;;高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新效率研究綜述[J];中國高新技術(shù)企業(yè);2009年08期

7 劉志迎;葉蓁;孟令杰;;我國高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)技術(shù)效率的實證分析[J];中國軟科學;2007年05期

8 梁萊歆;張煥鳳;;高科技上市公司R&D投入績效的實證研究[J];中南大學學報(社會科學版);2005年02期

本文編號：1455603