發(fā)布時間：2018-02-04 23:22

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： P2P 瀆職罪 監(jiān)管　出處：《南昌大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸行業(yè)作為一種新興產(chǎn)業(yè)依托互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的迅速發(fā)展在世界各國蓬勃發(fā)展,我國也不例外。但新生事物的發(fā)展必然會面臨一定的障礙,P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸行業(yè)的發(fā)展過程中,由于我國立法的滯后性和監(jiān)管的缺位,P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸行業(yè)的發(fā)展一直存在極大的刑事風(fēng)險。因此試從P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸行業(yè)監(jiān)管部門角度出發(fā),分析監(jiān)管部門的具體職責(zé)和瀆職表現(xiàn),以此督促監(jiān)管部門加強(qiáng)對P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸平臺的監(jiān)控,并控制P2P行業(yè)的蠻橫發(fā)展。通過對P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸平臺性質(zhì)以及最新的監(jiān)管法規(guī)的分析,結(jié)合瀆職罪中有關(guān)主體的認(rèn)定問題,首先可以明確金融領(lǐng)域內(nèi)的監(jiān)管主體主要是銀監(jiān)會、地方金融監(jiān)管部門和工商行政管理部門。其次,監(jiān)管主體的瀆職行為既可以以作為的方式實(shí)施也可以以不作為的方式實(shí)施,根據(jù)其具體職權(quán)而表現(xiàn)為不同的行為方式。P2P監(jiān)管瀆職的主觀罪過內(nèi)容既可以是故意也可以是過失,同時,由于P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸平臺的受眾十分廣泛,在認(rèn)定其危害結(jié)果的過程中,不僅要從財(cái)產(chǎn)損失的數(shù)量和計(jì)算期間上進(jìn)行認(rèn)定,還應(yīng)該充分考慮其所造成的社會影響、輿論指向等非物質(zhì)性損害結(jié)果的認(rèn)定。
[Abstract]:P2P network lending industry as a new industry rely on the rapid development of the Internet in the world booming, China is no exception, but the development of new things will inevitably face certain obstacles. In the development of P2P network lending industry, due to the lag of our legislation and the absence of supervision. The development of P2P network lending industry has been a great criminal risk. So try to analyze the specific responsibilities and malfeasance performance of the supervision department from the perspective of P2P network lending industry supervision department. In order to urge regulators to strengthen the monitoring of P2P network lending platform and control the arbitrary development of P2P industry. Through the analysis of the nature of P2P network lending platform and the latest regulatory regulations. Combined with malfeasance crime in the identification of the main body, first of all, it can be clear that the main regulatory body in the financial field is mainly the Banking Regulatory Commission, local financial regulatory authorities and industrial and commercial administrative departments. Secondly. The dereliction of duty of the main body of supervision can be carried out either by way of act or by way of omission. According to its specific authority and performance for different ways of behavior. P2P supervision malfeasance subjective content can be intentional or negligent, at the same time, because of P2P network lending platform is very wide audience. In the process of determining the result of its harm, we should not only determine the amount of property loss and the period of calculation, but also fully consider the determination of the result of non-material damage, such as the social impact caused by it, the direction of public opinion, and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D924.393;F724.6;F832.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曾威;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融競爭監(jiān)管制度的構(gòu)建[J];法商研究;2016年02期

2 孫艷軍;;基于P2P金融模式變異法律性質(zhì)之論證構(gòu)建其監(jiān)管模式[J];中央財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年03期

3 李愛君;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融的法治路徑[J];法學(xué)雜志;2016年02期

4 李曙光;;論互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融中的法律問題[J];法學(xué)雜志;2016年02期

5 李曉明;;P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸的刑法控制[J];法學(xué);2015年06期

6 楊東;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)金融風(fēng)險規(guī)制路徑[J];中國法學(xué);2015年03期

7 李有星;王琳;;地方金融監(jiān)管機(jī)構(gòu)的主體屬性與職能定位[J];金融法苑;2015年01期

8 伍堅(jiān);;我國P2P網(wǎng)貸平臺監(jiān)管的制度構(gòu)建[J];法學(xué);2015年04期

9 陳洪兵;;共犯論的分則思考——以貪污賄賂罪及瀆職罪為例[J];法學(xué)家;2015年02期

10 萬志堯;;P2P借貸的行政監(jiān)管需求與刑法審視[J];東方法學(xué);2015年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 葉瑜;P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)集資行為的刑法規(guī)制[D];華南理工大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號：1491444