【摘要】：1978年以來,產(chǎn)品市場(chǎng)的價(jià)格雙軌制逐步被取消,到現(xiàn)在產(chǎn)品市場(chǎng)基本上是競(jìng)爭(zhēng)統(tǒng)一的。相比之下,要素市場(chǎng)的發(fā)展進(jìn)程比較落后,生產(chǎn)要素市場(chǎng)存在著嚴(yán)重的分割。學(xué)者們指出,我國(guó)要素市場(chǎng)存在著嚴(yán)重的扭曲,在不同所有制、地區(qū)、行業(yè)以及要素之間具有一定的差異。本文以此為背景,建立了要素市場(chǎng)所有制分割與制造業(yè)生產(chǎn)率的聯(lián)系�；�1999-2009年中國(guó)工業(yè)企業(yè)數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù),文章以要素市場(chǎng)所有制分割為主線,分地區(qū)、分行業(yè)動(dòng)態(tài)分析了要素市場(chǎng)所有制分割對(duì)我國(guó)制造業(yè)生產(chǎn)率的影響,得出如下結(jié)論：(1)地區(qū)層面分析,要素市場(chǎng)所有制分割的效率損失為10%-20%。行業(yè)層面分析,這一數(shù)值為2%-27%。(2)所有制部門內(nèi)的要素價(jià)格扭曲程度大于所有制部門間的要素價(jià)格扭曲程度。(3)勞動(dòng)的TFP損失值都大于資本的TFP損失值,可推導(dǎo)出,資本要素的價(jià)格扭曲程度大于勞動(dòng)要素的價(jià)格扭曲程度。(4)研究期間,東部、中部、西部的TFP損失值整體上呈現(xiàn)出一種下降的趨勢(shì)。無論是資本還是勞動(dòng),高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)的TFP損失值整體上大于傳統(tǒng)的勞動(dòng)密集型產(chǎn)業(yè)。對(duì)于上述結(jié)論,本文做了進(jìn)一步地解釋和分析,并針對(duì)研究結(jié)果,提出了相應(yīng)地政策建議。
[Abstract]:Since 1978, the double-track price system in the product market has been gradually abolished, and now the product market is basically competitive and unified. In contrast, the development process of factor market is relatively backward, there is a serious division of production factor market. Scholars point out that there are serious distortions in the factor market in China, and there are certain differences among different ownership, region, industry and elements. Based on this background, this paper establishes the relationship between factor market ownership division and manufacturing productivity. Based on the database of China's industrial enterprises from 1999 to 2009, this paper analyzes the effect of factor market ownership division on the productivity of manufacturing industry in China, taking the division of factor market ownership as the main line, divided into regions and industries. The conclusions are as follows: (1) at the regional level, the efficiency loss of factor market ownership division is 10-20. At the industry level, this value is between 2 and 27. (2) the degree of distortion of factor price in ownership sector is greater than that of factor price distortion among ownership sectors. (3) the value of TFP loss of labor is greater than the value of TFP loss of capital, which can be deduced. The degree of price distortion of capital factor is greater than that of labor factor. (4) during the period of study, the TFP loss value of eastern, central and western areas showed a downward trend as a whole. Regardless of capital or labor, the TFP loss value of high-tech industry is larger than that of traditional labor-intensive industry as a whole. For the above conclusions, this paper makes further explanation and analysis, and puts forward corresponding policy suggestions in view of the research results.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F424;F224

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 林毅夫;龔強(qiáng);;發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略與經(jīng)濟(jì)制度選擇[J];管理世界;2010年03期

2 盛仕斌,徐海;要素價(jià)格扭曲的就業(yè)效應(yīng)研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;1999年05期

3 籍佳婧;;勞動(dòng)力市場(chǎng)扭曲對(duì)我國(guó)服務(wù)業(yè)就業(yè)的影響分析[J];上海經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2013年02期

4 徐長(zhǎng)生;劉望輝;;勞動(dòng)力市場(chǎng)扭曲與中國(guó)宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)失衡[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)研究;2008年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：2164550