改革開(kāi)放以來(lái)蘭州城市社會(huì)空間結(jié)構(gòu)演變分析
本文選題:社會(huì)空間 + 因子生態(tài)分析 ; 參考:《西北師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文
【摘要】:1987年城市土地有償使用制度的建立標(biāo)志著城市經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型的開(kāi)始,由計(jì)劃經(jīng)濟(jì)向市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型的重點(diǎn)是資源配置方式和經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展方式的轉(zhuǎn)變,體制轉(zhuǎn)型所引發(fā)的結(jié)構(gòu)轉(zhuǎn)型對(duì)中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展影響深遠(yuǎn),尤其是對(duì)城市——這一經(jīng)濟(jì)活動(dòng)最活躍的地理區(qū)域所產(chǎn)生的作用更加明顯,體現(xiàn)在城市經(jīng)濟(jì)活動(dòng)的需求結(jié)構(gòu)、產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)、貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)、要素結(jié)構(gòu)和企業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)5個(gè)方面,這使中國(guó)城市經(jīng)歷前所未有的變革與發(fā)展,也是城市社會(huì)空間逐漸趨向復(fù)雜和多元的直接原因,時(shí)空上表現(xiàn)為城市社會(huì)空間分異與重構(gòu);诖,本文依據(jù)蘭州市第3、5、6次人口普查數(shù)據(jù),利用因子生態(tài)分析方法對(duì)1982年、2000年和2010年蘭州城市社會(huì)空間結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行分析,從主因子變化特征、社會(huì)分異度變化特征和社會(huì)空間變化特征三個(gè)方面逐漸遞進(jìn)的順序展開(kāi)論述,最后得出結(jié)論。結(jié)果表明:(1)1982、2000、2010年三個(gè)研究時(shí)段內(nèi)蘭州城市社會(huì)空間主因子分別是:1982年為干部和工人階層因子、專業(yè)技術(shù)人員因子、農(nóng)業(yè)人口因子、商服業(yè)人口與民族人口因子,2000年為商服業(yè)人口因子、工業(yè)人口與老年人口因子、機(jī)關(guān)干部和專業(yè)技術(shù)人員因子、文化因子、教育事業(yè)人員因子、農(nóng)業(yè)人口因子、民族人口因子,2010年為職業(yè)狀況因子、工業(yè)人口與老年人口因子、文化、教育業(yè)人員因子、農(nóng)業(yè)人口因子、高學(xué)歷人員因子、民族人口因子。(2)由上述三個(gè)研究時(shí)段的主因子得出的社會(huì)空間類型分別是:1982年為企業(yè)管理人員和工人混合居住區(qū)、普通從業(yè)人員和少數(shù)民族人口混合居住區(qū)、專業(yè)技術(shù)人員和工人混合居住區(qū)、知識(shí)階層和高級(jí)職業(yè)者聚居區(qū)、農(nóng)業(yè)勞動(dòng)者居住區(qū),2000年為普通從業(yè)人員和流動(dòng)人口居住區(qū)、混合工人居住區(qū)、知識(shí)階層和高級(jí)職業(yè)者聚居區(qū)、干部、職員與技術(shù)人員密集分布區(qū)、少數(shù)民族人口密集的混合居住區(qū)、農(nóng)業(yè)勞動(dòng)者居住區(qū),2010年為干部職員、技術(shù)人員與普通市民混合居住區(qū)、普通從業(yè)人員和流動(dòng)人口居住區(qū)、混合工人居住區(qū)、少數(shù)民族人口密集的混合居住區(qū)、知識(shí)階層和高級(jí)職業(yè)者聚居區(qū)、工業(yè)基礎(chǔ)較好的農(nóng)業(yè)人口居住區(qū);據(jù)此將城市社會(huì)空間結(jié)構(gòu)模式為:a.帶狀結(jié)構(gòu)主導(dǎo)下的扇形模式、b.帶狀結(jié)構(gòu)主導(dǎo)下的同心圓模式,三個(gè)副中心逐漸成型、c.帶狀多中心主導(dǎo)下的混合模式,同心圓和扇形結(jié)構(gòu)的烙印依然較為清晰。(3)1982年、2000年、2010年,蘭州城市社會(huì)空間結(jié)構(gòu)變化與建國(guó)以來(lái)國(guó)家推行的政策密切相關(guān),宏觀政策對(duì)形成社會(huì)空間的要素具有直接影響,使社會(huì)空間結(jié)構(gòu)變化經(jīng)歷了以下三個(gè)階段:高度集中的計(jì)劃經(jīng)濟(jì)體制時(shí)期、計(jì)劃經(jīng)濟(jì)向市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)過(guò)渡時(shí)期、社會(huì)主義市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)體制時(shí)期,教育制度、戶籍制度、土地和住房制度、產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略以及城市規(guī)劃5個(gè)方面的政策改革成為制度轉(zhuǎn)向中蘭州城市社會(huì)空間結(jié)構(gòu)演化的內(nèi)在動(dòng)力。
[Abstract]:The establishment of the paid land use system in 1987 marks the beginning of the urban economic transformation. The emphasis of the transition from planned economy to market economy is the transformation of resource allocation and economic development. The structural transformation caused by the structural transformation has a profound impact on the economic development of China, especially on the urban, the most active geographical region of economic activities, which is reflected in the demand structure of urban economic activities and the industrial structure. The five aspects of trade structure, element structure and enterprise structure have made Chinese cities experience unprecedented changes and development, and are also the direct reasons for the gradual development of urban social space towards complexity and pluralism. Space-time performance for urban social space differentiation and reconstruction. Based on the data of the 6th census of Lanzhou City, this paper analyzes the urban social spatial structure of Lanzhou in 1982, 2000 and 2010 by using the method of factor ecological analysis. The change characteristics of social differentiation and the characteristics of social spatial change are discussed in the order of gradual progression, and finally a conclusion is drawn. The results show that the main factors of urban social space in Lanzhou during the three periods of time of study are: the cadre and worker class factor, the professional and technical personnel factor, and the agricultural population factor in 1982. Commercial service industry population and national population factor, commercial service industry population factor in 2000, industrial population and elderly population factor, mechanism cadre and professional and technical personnel factor, culture factor, education personnel factor, agricultural population factor, National population factor, 2010 as occupational status factor, industrial population and elderly population factor, culture, education personnel factor, agricultural population factor, higher education personnel factor, The social spatial types obtained from the main factors of the above three research periods are as follows: in 1982, the mixed residential area of enterprise managers and workers, the mixed residential area of the general employed and the ethnic minority population. The mixed residential areas of professional and technical personnel and workers, the areas where the intellectual class and the senior professionals are concentrated, the residential areas of agricultural workers, the residential areas of the general employed and the floating population, the residential areas of mixed workers, the areas of the intellectual class and the high professional population, The areas where cadres, staff and technicians are densely distributed, the mixed residential areas where ethnic minorities are densely populated, the residential areas for agricultural workers, the mixed residential areas for cadres and clerks, technical personnel and ordinary citizens in 2010, the residential areas for ordinary employees and floating population, The urban social spatial structure is divided into two parts: the mixed workers' residential area, the mixed residential area with dense ethnic population, the intellectual class and the high professional population's residential area, and the agricultural population's residential area with good industrial foundation, according to which the urban social spatial structure model is: a. Fan-shaped pattern dominated by banded structure. In the concentric circular pattern dominated by banded structure, the three secondary centers are gradually formed. In the mixed pattern of banded multi-center, the imprint of concentric circle and fan-shaped structure is still relatively clear.) in 1982, 2000 and 2010, the change of urban social spatial structure in Lanzhou is closely related to the policies pursued by the state since the founding of the people's Republic of China. The macro policy has direct influence on the elements of forming social space, which makes the change of social spatial structure go through the following three stages: the period of highly centralized planned economy system, the period of transition from planned economy to market economy. In the period of socialist market economy system, education system, household registration system, land and housing system, industrial development strategy and urban planning are five aspects of policy reform.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:西北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2015
【分類號(hào)】:F299.27
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 劉宇;韓春雨;;我國(guó)社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期間城市社會(huì)空間分異格局分析[J];技術(shù)與市場(chǎng);2012年11期
2 王開(kāi)泳,肖玲,王淑婧;城市社會(huì)空間結(jié)構(gòu)研究的回顧與展望[J];熱帶地理;2005年01期
3 楊上廣;王春蘭;;大城市社會(huì)空間演變態(tài)勢(shì)剖析與治理反思——基于上海的調(diào)查與思考[J];公共管理學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期
4 陳浩;張京祥;宋偉軒;;空間植入:大事件對(duì)城市社會(huì)空間演化的影響研究——以昆明為例[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2010年02期
5 黃曉軍;黃馨;;20世紀(jì)長(zhǎng)春城市社會(huì)空間結(jié)構(gòu)演化[J];地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2013年11期
6 魏立華;閆小培;;轉(zhuǎn)型期中國(guó)城市社會(huì)空間演進(jìn)動(dòng)力及其模式研究——以廣州市為例[J];地理與地理信息科學(xué);2006年01期
7 劉蘇衡;張力民;;武漢市城市社會(huì)空間結(jié)構(gòu)演變過(guò)程分析[J];云南地理環(huán)境研究;2008年03期
8 張純;;評(píng)《中國(guó)城市社會(huì)空間與管制:從單位制度起源到改革》[J];城市與區(qū)域規(guī)劃研究;2009年02期
9 徐e,
本文編號(hào):1934994
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/jingjilunwen/hongguanjingjilunwen/1934994.html