本文選題：新型城鎮(zhèn)化　切入點：城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施　出處：《天津商業(yè)大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：城鎮(zhèn)化是我國經(jīng)濟結(jié)構(gòu)性變化的根本推動力,將從供給和需求兩方面影響經(jīng)濟增長,城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施供給的技術(shù)狀態(tài)、功能負荷直接影響著城市社會經(jīng)濟系統(tǒng)運行的綜合效率,供給水平?jīng)Q定著新型城鎮(zhèn)化的質(zhì)量。本文在國內(nèi)外相關(guān)文獻研究基礎(chǔ)之上,以研究如何實現(xiàn)城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施供給與新型城鎮(zhèn)化協(xié)同發(fā)展為目的,分析我國城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施供給缺口,深入剖析缺口存在的原因,論證提高城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施供給效率的必要性,構(gòu)建效率評價模型,重點探究如何提高城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施供給效率。首先,用1975-2015年直觀數(shù)據(jù)展現(xiàn)我國傳統(tǒng)城鎮(zhèn)化取得的成果與存在的問題,提出新型城鎮(zhèn)化對城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施供給的新要求,論證城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施供給在新型城鎮(zhèn)化進程中的重要地位。其次,分析目前城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施供給水平與新型城鎮(zhèn)化帶來的新增需求缺口。一方面大致說明民眾對于城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施供給的滿意程度;另一方面,用直觀統(tǒng)計數(shù)據(jù)說明我國目前城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施存量供給現(xiàn)狀,并與《國家新型城鎮(zhèn)化規(guī)劃2012-2020》中城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施的目標規(guī)模予以對比,分析按此速度發(fā)展是否能達到規(guī)劃目標規(guī)模,同時,將規(guī)劃中沒有提到的指標與發(fā)達國家之間予以比較,得出結(jié)論,我國目前城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施供給總量不足,區(qū)域結(jié)構(gòu)失衡。綜合分析我國現(xiàn)供給需求缺口存在的具體原因,排除區(qū)域間經(jīng)濟發(fā)展程度差距較大這一重要不可逆原因,主要有幾下點:一是投資主體單一,有效競爭缺乏;二是融資渠道狹窄;三是地方政府重增長輕發(fā)展。論證提高城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施供給效率在經(jīng)濟轉(zhuǎn)軌投入受約束大背景下對提高城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施供給水平的重要性。再次,對城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施供給效率予以評價。選取城市維護建設(shè)資金支出中的維護支出、城市市政公用設(shè)施建設(shè)固定資產(chǎn)投資額、城市建設(shè)人力投入作為城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施供給投入指標;選取能代表城市綜合承載力的城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施指標作為產(chǎn)出指標,基于DEA對除拉薩外的23個省會城市、3個自治區(qū)首府、4個直轄市投入產(chǎn)出效率進行截面靜態(tài)評價,基于Malmquist指數(shù)對我國2008-2014年各地區(qū)的效率變化進行動態(tài)評價,評價結(jié)果表明:我國整體城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施供給效率未達最優(yōu),東部地區(qū)較中、西部地區(qū)有效,近年供給效率有小幅度提高,但來源主要是純技術(shù)進步變化,技術(shù)效率變化不大,說明要提高我國城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施供給效率,應(yīng)提高資源使用效率、政府的管理水平等多方面綜合能力,而非盲目加大投入;深入分析供給過程效率不高的原因有以下幾點:一是重投入輕維護,管理過于集中;二是資源整合力不強,運作效率低下;三是存量資產(chǎn)未盤活。最后,結(jié)合城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施供給效率未達最優(yōu)的具體原因分析,借鑒東部城市先進管理經(jīng)驗,提出針對性政策建議。一是整合政府資源,提高管理水平;二是控制規(guī)模,提高規(guī)模效率;三是創(chuàng)新技術(shù),提高技術(shù)效率;四是完善建后管護機制。以期為提高我國城市基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施供給效率提供借鑒。
[Abstract]:Urbanization is the fundamental driving force of China's economic structural changes, from two aspects of supply and demand affect economic growth, technical status of city infrastructure supply, the function of load directly affects the comprehensive efficiency of the city social and economic system, the supply level determines the quality of the new urbanization. Based on the related literature at home and abroad on the basis of the study in order to study, how to realize the city infrastructure and new urbanization coordinated development, analysis of the gap of city infrastructure supply in China, in-depth analysis of the reasons for the gap exists, it is necessary to improve the urban infrastructure supply efficiency, establish the efficiency evaluation model, and focus on how to improve the city infrastructure supply efficiency. First of all, show the traditional China's urbanization achievements and problems with 1975-2015 years of visual data, put forward the new urbanization of city infrastructure The new requirements of supply, the important position of demonstration city infrastructure in the new urbanization process. Secondly, the analysis of the current level of city basic facilities supply and new urbanization brings new demand gap. On the one hand can tell the satisfaction for the city public infrastructure supply; on the other hand, the city infrastructure stock supply the status quo of China's visual and statistical data, and the "national new urbanization plan 2012-2020> in city infrastructure scale are compared, analyzed according to the speed of development can achieve the planning target scale, at the same time, the planning is not mentioned between the index and the developed country comparison, concluded that China's total city the current infrastructure supply shortage, imbalance of regional structure. The comprehensive analysis of the specific reasons of China's current supply and demand gap exists, excluding the degree of economic development between regions A larger gap between this important irreversible reason, there are several main points: one is the single investment, lack of effective competition; two is the narrow financing channels; three is the local government heavy growth light development. Improve the demonstration of city infrastructure supply efficiency in the transition into the constrained background of importance to improve the supply level of city facilities based. Again, comment on the city infrastructure supply efficiency. Select the city maintenance and construction fund expenditures in the maintenance expenditure, city municipal utilities construction investment in fixed assets, city construction manpower as the city infrastructure investment index; to select a representative city comprehensive city infrastructure capacity index as output index, DEA the 23 capital city in Lhasa on the 3, the capital of the autonomous region, section static evaluation of the input-output efficiency of 4 municipalities, based on Malmquist The number of the dynamic evaluation of the efficiency change of China's 2008-2014 years in all regions, the evaluation results show that the overall efficiency of city infrastructure supply in China has not reached the optimal, the eastern region than in the western region, effective supply efficiency in small increase, but is the main source of pure technological progress, technical efficiency change, to to improve the efficiency of city infrastructure in our country, we should improve the efficiency of resource use, the management level of government and other aspects of the comprehensive ability, rather than blindly increase investment; in-depth analysis of the reasons for the inefficiency of supply process are the following: one is the input light weight maintenance, management is too centralized; the two is the integration of resources is not strong. The operation efficiency is low; the three is to revitalize the stock of assets not. Finally, combined with the analysis of the specific reasons for city infrastructure supply efficiency was not optimal, from the eastern city of advanced management experience, put forward specific policy The first is to integrate government resources and improve management level; the two is to control scale and scale efficiency; the three is to innovate technology and improve technical efficiency; the four is to improve the post construction management and protection mechanism, so as to provide reference for improving the efficiency of urban infrastructure supply in China.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津商業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：F299.24

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王登嶸,馬向明,周春山;轉(zhuǎn)型時期基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施供給演變特征及其發(fā)展趨勢——以東莞為例[J];城市規(guī)劃;2005年01期

2 門s，

本文編號：1622112