【摘要】：近年來(lái),以服務(wù)業(yè)和高端制造業(yè)為代表的新一輪全球產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移浪潮愈演愈烈。服務(wù)外包作為此次產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移的重要表現(xiàn)形式,其環(huán)境污染小、資源消耗低、附加值高、吸納就業(yè)能力強(qiáng)的特點(diǎn),贏得了各國(guó)尤其是發(fā)展中國(guó)家的青睞,服務(wù)外包承接方的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)日益激烈。盡管受到金融危機(jī)和歐洲債務(wù)危機(jī)的不利影響,服務(wù)外包發(fā)展的腳步放慢,但隨著世界經(jīng)濟(jì)的復(fù)蘇和全球化的必然趨勢(shì),服務(wù)外包必將成為未來(lái)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的重要推手。在這種背景下,本文試圖探討,影響一國(guó)承接服務(wù)外包競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的影響因素有哪些?與其他主要承接服務(wù)外包的國(guó)家相比,我國(guó)存在哪些不足?要想更好地承接服務(wù)外包,中國(guó)應(yīng)該從哪些方面改進(jìn)呢? 本文運(yùn)用比較優(yōu)勢(shì)理論和要素稟賦理論、規(guī)模經(jīng)濟(jì)理論、交易成本理論以及國(guó)家競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)理論分析了服務(wù)外包產(chǎn)生的理論機(jī)制,結(jié)合現(xiàn)有的研究成果以及服務(wù)外包的特點(diǎn),提出了影響服務(wù)外包承接方競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的六個(gè)因素：經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)模、人力資本、經(jīng)濟(jì)自由度、基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施、服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展水平和知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)。站在發(fā)展中國(guó)家的角度,運(yùn)用面板數(shù)據(jù)模型對(duì)38個(gè)樣本國(guó)家進(jìn)行回歸,并將樣本國(guó)家分為了發(fā)展中國(guó)家樣本和發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家樣本分別進(jìn)行回歸,結(jié)果表明經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)模、服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展水平、人力資本、基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施水平和知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)是影響發(fā)展中國(guó)家服務(wù)外包承接競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的顯著因素。其中經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)模的影響最大,而基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施水平對(duì)發(fā)展中國(guó)家承接服務(wù)外包競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的影響最小,說(shuō)明發(fā)包方在選擇服務(wù)提供商時(shí)非�？粗爻薪拥氐慕�(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展水平,基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施的影響程度不及其他的因素。而對(duì)于發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家而言,經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)模和人力資源稟賦是最大的影響因素,服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展水平和基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施完善度卻對(duì)其發(fā)展服務(wù)外包產(chǎn)生了不利影響。 通過(guò)對(duì)比中國(guó)與其他主要服務(wù)外包承接國(guó)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力影響因素的差異,指出中國(guó)國(guó)服務(wù)外包存在的問(wèn)題在于政策支持力度不夠、企業(yè)能力單一、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)不力、缺乏行業(yè)組織引領(lǐng)和國(guó)內(nèi)服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展水平滯后。最后,結(jié)合實(shí)證分析結(jié)果,針對(duì)上述問(wèn)題提出了改善建議。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the service industry and high-end manufacturing industry as the representative of a new wave of global industrial transfer intensified. As an important manifestation of this industry transfer, service outsourcing has won the favor of all countries, especially developing countries, because of its small environmental pollution, low consumption of resources, high added value and strong ability to absorb employment. The competition of service outsourcing parties is becoming more and more fierce. Despite the negative impact of the financial crisis and the European debt crisis, the pace of service outsourcing development slowed down, but with the recovery of the world economy and the inevitable trend of globalization, service outsourcing will become an important driving force of economic development in the future. In this context, this paper attempts to explore, what are the factors that affect the competitiveness of a country to undertake service outsourcing? Compared with other countries that mainly undertake service outsourcing, what are the shortcomings of our country? In order to better undertake service outsourcing, what aspects should China improve? This paper uses comparative advantage theory, factor endowment theory, scale economy theory, transaction cost theory and national competitive advantage theory to analyze the theoretical mechanism of service outsourcing, combined with the existing research results and the characteristics of service outsourcing. Six factors affecting the competitiveness of service outsourcing recipients are put forward: economic scale, human capital, economic freedom, infrastructure, service development level and intellectual property protection. From the perspective of developing countries, we use panel data model to regression 38 sample countries, and divide the sample countries into developing countries and developed countries. The results show that the economic scale. The development level of service industry, human capital, infrastructure level and intellectual property protection are the significant factors that affect the competitiveness of service outsourcing in developing countries. Among them, the impact of economic scale is the greatest, while the level of infrastructure has the least impact on the competitiveness of developing countries to undertake service outsourcing. This shows that the contracting parties attach great importance to the level of economic development of the recipient countries when selecting service providers. Infrastructure is less influential than other factors. For developed countries, the economic scale and human resource endowment are the most important factors, but the level of service development and the perfection of infrastructure have a negative impact on the development of service outsourcing. By comparing the influence factors between China and other major service outsourcing recipient countries, the paper points out that the problems of Chinese service outsourcing are insufficient policy support, single enterprise capacity and weak intellectual property protection. Lack of industry organization leads and domestic service industry development level lags behind. Finally, according to the results of empirical analysis, some suggestions are put forward to improve the above problems.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：F719;F224

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王曉紅;;新一輪服務(wù)業(yè)離岸外包的理論分析[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年09期

2 任志成;張二震;;承接國(guó)際服務(wù)外包的就業(yè)效應(yīng)[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年06期

3 宋麗麗;薛求知;;國(guó)際服務(wù)外包供應(yīng)商選擇影響因素研究——基于在華服務(wù)承接企業(yè)的實(shí)證分析[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年08期

4 呂延方;趙進(jìn)文;;中國(guó)承接服務(wù)外包影響因素分析——基于多國(guó)面板數(shù)據(jù)的實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年07期

5 陳菲;服務(wù)外包動(dòng)因機(jī)制分析及發(fā)展趨勢(shì)預(yù)測(cè)——美國(guó)服務(wù)外包的驗(yàn)證[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2005年06期

6 孟慶亮;;服務(wù)外包國(guó)際化的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)合作;2008年01期

7 劉紹堅(jiān);;中國(guó)承接國(guó)際軟件外包的現(xiàn)狀、模式及發(fā)展對(duì)策研究[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易;2007年06期

8 胡昭玲;王洋;;中國(guó)承接服務(wù)外包的影響因素分析[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;2010年02期

9 陳軍亞;;承接國(guó)際服務(wù)外包的影響因素分析——兼論中國(guó)的承接能力[J];華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年01期

10 王曉紅;;全球服務(wù)業(yè)離岸外包的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)與中國(guó)的政策選擇[J];宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2007年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：2168343