【摘要】：裝備制造業(yè)是國民經(jīng)濟(jì)的基礎(chǔ)產(chǎn)業(yè)，為我國經(jīng)濟(jì)的增長做出了巨大貢獻(xiàn)。在近50年的發(fā)展過程中，裝備制造業(yè)已經(jīng)形成了較為全面的工業(yè)配套體系，但是裝備制造業(yè)發(fā)展的問題也日益凸顯，最主要的問題是裝備制造業(yè)的技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力比較差。面對(duì)全球經(jīng)濟(jì)分工新一輪的洗牌，以及我國的勞動(dòng)力成本上升和自然資源的減少，裝備制造業(yè)迎來了嚴(yán)峻挑戰(zhàn)。裝備制造業(yè)必須進(jìn)行結(jié)構(gòu)升級(jí)，加大自主創(chuàng)新的力度。 生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)能夠?qū)⒓夹g(shù)和知識(shí)作為生產(chǎn)要素，輸送到裝備制造業(yè)當(dāng)中，即生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)能夠提高裝備制造業(yè)的技術(shù)創(chuàng)新能力，為裝備制造業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)升級(jí)提供支持；而裝備制造業(yè)對(duì)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的需求，將為生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的發(fā)展提供支持。但是在我國生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)還未發(fā)展起來，并且生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)對(duì)裝備制造業(yè)的作用比較微弱。因此有必要研究生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)對(duì)裝備制造業(yè)的作用微弱的原因，通過對(duì)我國典型區(qū)域裝備制造業(yè)和生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展?fàn)顩r的對(duì)比，提出我國生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)促進(jìn)裝備制造業(yè)發(fā)展的建議與對(duì)策。 本文以Ethier（1982）的生產(chǎn)函數(shù)和Romer(1990)的“內(nèi)生技術(shù)變動(dòng)”模型為基礎(chǔ)建立理論模型。通過模型說明裝備制造業(yè)和生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)能夠協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展，并且當(dāng)裝備制造業(yè)和生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展時(shí)，生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)能夠提高裝備制造業(yè)的生產(chǎn)效率；通過提出生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)促進(jìn)裝備制造業(yè)的路徑，進(jìn)而建立回歸模型，運(yùn)用最小二乘法，利用Eviews軟件，進(jìn)行回歸分析。通過對(duì)實(shí)證結(jié)果的分析說明，我國的生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)對(duì)裝備制造業(yè)的生產(chǎn)效率的影響較小，而生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)通過技術(shù)創(chuàng)新、減少成本、帶動(dòng)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長對(duì)裝備制造業(yè)生產(chǎn)效率的影響微弱；通過對(duì)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)專業(yè)化程度，裝備制造業(yè)和生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的交易成本，裝備制造業(yè)和生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的供需關(guān)系的研究，希望找出我國生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)對(duì)裝備制造業(yè)影響微弱的原因；通過對(duì)長三角經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)、京津冀經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)、珠三角經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)和東北經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)的對(duì)比分析，說明我國裝備制造業(yè)和生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展的優(yōu)劣勢，最后得到我國生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)促進(jìn)裝備制造業(yè)發(fā)展的對(duì)策建議。為了使我國生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)促進(jìn)裝備制造業(yè)的發(fā)展：首先，應(yīng)提高生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的專業(yè)化程度，大型裝備制造業(yè)企業(yè)向“大而�！卑l(fā)展，而中小型裝備制造業(yè)向“小而精”發(fā)展；第二，降低裝備制造業(yè)和生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的交易成本,包括機(jī)會(huì)成本、信任成本、信息成本和人才資源成本；第三，增加裝備制造業(yè)對(duì)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的需求，這也是裝備制造業(yè)進(jìn)行產(chǎn)業(yè)升級(jí)和結(jié)構(gòu)轉(zhuǎn)型的必然選擇；最后，提高生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的供給能力。通過制定合理的準(zhǔn)入制度和優(yōu)惠政策，提高生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)企業(yè)數(shù)量。通過制度完善的產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展政策，提高生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的市場化進(jìn)程。 本文主要分為七個(gè)部分：第一章緒論，主要提出論文的問題和解決問題的方法；第二章文獻(xiàn)綜述，主要是對(duì)中國和外國關(guān)于裝備制造業(yè)和生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展的理論、進(jìn)展、發(fā)展方向進(jìn)行梳理；第三章生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)促進(jìn)裝備制造業(yè)發(fā)展的理論模型，說明生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的產(chǎn)品作為裝備制造業(yè)的一種重要中間投入要素能夠減少裝備制造業(yè)的生產(chǎn)成本，提高裝備制造業(yè)產(chǎn)品的增加值，進(jìn)而提高裝備制造業(yè)的生產(chǎn)效率。本章以Ethier（1982）的生產(chǎn)函數(shù)和Romer(1990)的“內(nèi)生技術(shù)變動(dòng)”模型為基礎(chǔ)建立理論模型，證明當(dāng)裝備制造業(yè)和生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)處于均衡增長路徑上時(shí)，即二者協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展時(shí)，生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)可以提高裝備制造業(yè)的生產(chǎn)效率；第四章生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)促進(jìn)裝備制造發(fā)展的路徑及實(shí)證檢驗(yàn)。分析在現(xiàn)實(shí)中，中國的裝備制造業(yè)和生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)是否在均衡發(fā)展路徑上，中國的生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)是否提高了裝備制造業(yè)生產(chǎn)效率。通過提出生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)促進(jìn)裝備制造業(yè)的路徑，進(jìn)而建立回歸模型，通過實(shí)證分析得出中國生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)促進(jìn)裝備制造業(yè)發(fā)展的現(xiàn)狀；第五章生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)促進(jìn)裝備制造業(yè)發(fā)展的影響因素。通過對(duì)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)專業(yè)化程度，裝備制造業(yè)和生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的交易成本，裝備制造業(yè)和生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的供需關(guān)系的研究，找出我國生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)對(duì)裝備制造業(yè)影響微弱原因；第六章四大區(qū)域生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)促進(jìn)裝備制造業(yè)發(fā)展的比較研究。分析了長三角經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)、京津冀經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)、珠三角經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)和東北經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)裝備制造業(yè)和生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展的優(yōu)勢和不足，通過比較分析得出我國生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)促進(jìn)裝備制造業(yè)發(fā)展的路徑；第七章生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)促進(jìn)裝備制造業(yè)發(fā)展的對(duì)策建議。通過對(duì)以上章節(jié)的分析提出我國生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)促進(jìn)裝備制造業(yè)發(fā)展的啟示，主要從提高生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的專業(yè)化水平，降低裝備制造業(yè)和生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的交易成本，，增加裝備制造業(yè)對(duì)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的需求，及提高生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的供給能力等方面提出了生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)促進(jìn)裝備制造業(yè)發(fā)展的對(duì)策建議。
[Abstract]:The equipment manufacturing industry is the basic industry of the national economy, which has made great contribution to the economic growth of our country. In the development process of the recent 50 years, the equipment manufacturing industry has formed a more comprehensive industrial supporting system, but the problems of the development of the equipment manufacturing industry are becoming increasingly prominent. The most important problem is the technological innovation ability of the equipment manufacturing industry. In the face of a new round of shuffling of the global economic division, as well as the rise in labor costs and the reduction of natural resources in China, the equipment manufacturing industry is facing a severe challenge. The equipment manufacturing industry must upgrade its structure and strengthen its independent innovation.
The production service industry can deliver the technology and knowledge as production elements to the equipment manufacturing industry. That is, the productive service industry can improve the technological innovation capability of the equipment manufacturing industry and support the upgrading of the equipment manufacturing industry, and the demand of the equipment manufacturing industry to the productive service industry will provide a support for the development of the productive service industry. But in our country, the production service industry has not yet developed, and the role of the productive service industry to the equipment manufacturing industry is relatively weak. Therefore, it is necessary to study the reasons for the weak role of the production service industry to the equipment manufacturing industry, and put forward our country through the comparison of the development of the equipment manufacturing and the production service industry in the typical areas of China. Suggestions and Countermeasures for producer services to promote the development of equipment manufacturing industry.
This paper builds a theoretical model based on the production function of Ethier (1982) and the "endogenous technology change" model of Romer (1990). Through the model, it shows that the equipment manufacturing industry and the productive service industry can develop harmonously, and the production service industry can improve the production of the equipment manufacturing industry when the equipment manufacturing industry and the productive service industry develop in a coordinated way. Efficiency; by putting forward the production service industry to promote the equipment manufacturing industry, then establishing the regression model, using the least square method and using the Eviews software to carry on the regression analysis. Through the analysis of the empirical results, the production service industry has little influence on the production efficiency of the equipment manufacturing industry, while the productive service industry passes the technology. Through the study of the specialization degree of the production service industry, the transaction cost of the equipment manufacturing industry and the productive service industry, the supply and demand relationship between the equipment manufacturing industry and the productive service industry, we hope to find out the production service industry of our country to the equipment manufacturing industry. By comparing the economic zone of the Yangtze River Delta, the Beijing Tianjin Hebei Economic Zone, the Pearl River Delta economic zone and the Northeast Economic Zone, the advantages and disadvantages of the development of the equipment manufacturing industry and the productive service industry in China are illustrated. Finally, the countermeasures and suggestions for the development of the equipment manufacturing industry in our productive service industry are obtained. The industry promotes the development of the equipment manufacturing industry. First, we should improve the specialization of the production service industry, the large equipment manufacturing enterprises develop to a "big and special" development, and the small and medium equipment manufacturing industry develops to "small and fine"; second, reduce the transaction costs of the equipment manufacturing industry and the productive service industry, including the opportunity cost, the trust cost, and the information. Cost and the cost of talent resources; third, increase the demand of the equipment manufacturing industry to the productive service industry, which is the inevitable choice for the equipment manufacturing industry to upgrade the industry and the structural transformation; finally, improve the supply capacity of the productive service industry. Through the formulation of a reasonable admittance system and preferential policies, the number of productive service enterprises will be improved. Through a sound industrial development policy, we should improve the marketization process of producer services.
This article is divided into seven parts: the first chapter is the introduction, which mainly puts forward the problems of the paper and the methods to solve the problem; the second chapter is mainly a review of the theory, progress and direction of the development of the equipment manufacturing industry and the productive service industry in China and foreign countries, and the third chapter of the productive service industry promotes the development of the equipment manufacturing industry. The theoretical model shows that the production service industry is an important intermediate input element in the equipment manufacturing industry, which can reduce the production cost of the equipment manufacturing industry, improve the added value of the equipment manufacturing industry, and then improve the production efficiency of the equipment manufacturing industry. This chapter is based on the production function of Ethier (1982) and the "endogenous technology" of Romer (1990). The theory model based on the change model proves that when the equipment manufacturing industry and the productive service industry are on the balanced growth path, that is, when the two parties develop harmoniously, the productive service industry can improve the production efficiency of the equipment manufacturing industry; the fourth chapter is the path and empirical test of the production service industry to promote the development of equipment manufacturing. Whether China's equipment manufacturing industry and the productive service industry are on the balanced development path, China's productive service industry has improved the production efficiency of the equipment manufacturing industry. By putting forward the production service industry to promote the equipment manufacturing industry, and then establishing a regression model, the production service industry in China promotes the equipment system through the evidence analysis. The fifth chapter is the influence factors of the production service industry to promote the development of the equipment manufacturing industry. Through the study of the specialization degree of the production service industry, the transaction cost of the equipment manufacturing industry and the productive service industry, the supply and demand relationship between the equipment manufacturing industry and the productive service industry, the production service industry of our country is found out to the equipment manufacturing industry. The sixth chapter, the comparative study on the development of the equipment manufacturing industry in the production service industry of the four large regions, analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the development of the equipment manufacturing industry and the productive service industry in the Yangtze River Delta Economic Zone, the Beijing Tianjin Hebei Economic Zone, the Pearl River Delta economic zone and the Northeast Economic Zone, and draws a conclusion through comparative analysis that the productive service industry in China promotes the development of the industry. The seventh chapter of the production service industry promotes the development of the equipment manufacturing industry. Through the analysis of the above chapters, it puts forward the Enlightenment of the production service industry in our country to promote the development of the equipment manufacturing industry, mainly from the improvement of the professional leveling of the productive service industry and the reduction of the equipment manufacturing industry and the productive service industry. The transaction costs, increase the demand for the equipment manufacturing industry to the productive service industry, and improve the supply capacity of the productive service industry, put forward the countermeasures and suggestions for the production service industry to promote the development of the equipment manufacturing industry.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F426.4;F719

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鐘韻,閆小培;西方地理學(xué)界關(guān)于生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)作用研究述評(píng)[J];人文地理;2005年03期

2 周明生,王輝龍;淺論生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)對(duì)產(chǎn)業(yè)集群創(chuàng)新的作用機(jī)理[J];南方經(jīng)濟(jì);2005年10期

3 姚耀;陳高森;駱守儉;;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長的關(guān)系研究:以上海市為例[J];華東經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2006年09期

4 劉岐濤;;大力發(fā)展生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè) 增強(qiáng)城市競爭力[J];宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2006年08期

5 鄭友;;電子商務(wù)平臺(tái)下的本國生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展研究[J];科技創(chuàng)業(yè)月刊;2006年10期

6 李轉(zhuǎn)少;;四學(xué)會(huì)聯(lián)手舉辦報(bào)告會(huì) 聚焦“機(jī)械工業(yè)的增值服務(wù)”[J];中國機(jī)電工業(yè);2008年02期

7 劉飛龍;;廈門發(fā)展生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的戰(zhàn)略思考[J];廈門特區(qū)黨校學(xué)報(bào);2009年02期

8 賀俊果;;山西省服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀及對(duì)策研究[J];北方經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年11期

9 吳可人;;推進(jìn)服務(wù)業(yè)從制造業(yè)的分離[J];浙江經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年06期

10 熊杰;;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與集群制造業(yè)關(guān)系研究綜述[J];商場現(xiàn)代化;2010年31期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 殷莉;;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè):新一輪陜西經(jīng)濟(jì)增長的重要支柱[A];《資本論》與貧困問題研究——陜西省《資本論》研究會(huì)2007年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2007年

2 謝芳;;論生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與制造業(yè)的互動(dòng)發(fā)展——以浙江省為例[A];經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展方式轉(zhuǎn)變與自主創(chuàng)新——第十二屆中國科學(xué)技術(shù)協(xié)會(huì)年會(huì)（第四卷）[C];2010年

3 謝芳;;論生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與制造業(yè)的互動(dòng)發(fā)展——以浙江省為例[A];第五屆（2010）中國管理學(xué)年會(huì)——城市與區(qū)域管理分會(huì)場論文集[C];2010年

4 謝芳;;論生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與制造業(yè)的互動(dòng)發(fā)展——以浙江省為例[A];第12屆中國科協(xié)年會(huì)第31分會(huì)場海峽兩岸區(qū)域合作與協(xié)同發(fā)展論壇論文集[C];2010年

5 王鶴春;張懷野;;推進(jìn)沈陽現(xiàn)代生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)大發(fā)展快發(fā)展的對(duì)策構(gòu)建研究[A];第八屆沈陽科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2011年

6 ;第六章 發(fā)展生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè),走新型工業(yè)化道路[A];黑龍江省現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展研究報(bào)告[C];2008年

7 于琨;張展;李懷忠;;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與遼寧生態(tài)省建設(shè)研究[A];科技創(chuàng)新與產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展（B卷）——第七屆沈陽科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)暨渾南高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展論壇文集[C];2010年

8 高麗峰;王興權(quán);曲丹丹;;基于互動(dòng)論的生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與制造業(yè)互動(dòng)發(fā)展研究—以遼寧為例[A];創(chuàng)新沈陽文集（C）[C];2009年

9 李四化;;關(guān)于沈陽市生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與制造業(yè)融合發(fā)展的對(duì)策研究[A];科技創(chuàng)新與產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展（B卷）——第七屆沈陽科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)暨渾南高新技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展論壇文集[C];2010年

10 劉向東;;現(xiàn)階段我國生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展研究[A];加快服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展問題研究[C];2011年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 記者 潘榮進(jìn)　通訊員 黃建軍;梅蘭進(jìn)軍生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)[N];泰州日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

2 胡虎;進(jìn)軍生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)正當(dāng)時(shí)[N];人民郵電;2008年

3 記者 肖新華;新招拓展生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)[N];溫州日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

4 通訊員 李寧;生產(chǎn)性、服務(wù)業(yè)投資商競相入駐江橋[N];東方城鄉(xiāng)報(bào);2009年

5 國務(wù)院發(fā)展研究中心 來有為;加快生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展意義重大[N];中國經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)報(bào);2009年

6 ;上海：生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)促轉(zhuǎn)型保增長[N];人民郵電;2009年

7 本報(bào)記者 李玉峰;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)拓寬天鋼路[N];天津日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

8 國家發(fā)展改革委產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)與技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究所 王佳元;水平不同 政策各異[N];中國經(jīng)濟(jì)導(dǎo)報(bào);2009年

9 本報(bào)記者 龔丹韻;回暖階段上海如何加速轉(zhuǎn)型[N];解放日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

10 本報(bào)記者 劉芳濱;青島加快發(fā)展生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)[N];青島日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 崔純;中國生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)促進(jìn)裝備制造業(yè)發(fā)展研究[D];遼寧大學(xué);2013年

2 陳國亮;新經(jīng)濟(jì)地理學(xué)視角下的生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2010年

3 陳菁菁;空間視角下的生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與制造業(yè)的協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2011年

4 孫青芬;中國生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的發(fā)展及影響因素研究[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2012年

5 張勇;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)空間集聚的實(shí)證研究[D];遼寧大學(xué);2012年

6 李博;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與制造業(yè)互動(dòng)研究[D];遼寧師范大學(xué);2011年

7 樊文靜;中國生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展悖論及其形成機(jī)理[D];浙江大學(xué);2013年

8 賈輝;我國生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)就業(yè)與影響因素研究[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2013年

9 祝新;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展與區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)增長[D];華中科技大學(xué);2011年

10 郭向陽;廣東生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 山靜靜;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)對(duì)我國經(jīng)濟(jì)增長的影響研究[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2010年

2 李軍;中國生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)升級(jí)路徑研究[D];大連理工大學(xué);2010年

3 王曉娜;城市生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)自增強(qiáng)效應(yīng)研究[D];大連理工大學(xué);2010年

4 董昕靈;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚的影響因素分析[D];南京財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年

5 劉俊宏;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長的促進(jìn)作用研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2011年

6 讓淑杰;我國生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)開放問題研究[D];南京理工大學(xué);2010年

7 施甜甜;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與制造業(yè)的互動(dòng)發(fā)展研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2010年

8 孫瑩;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與城市功能互動(dòng)發(fā)展研究[D];北京工業(yè)大學(xué);2010年

9 劉銀蓮;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)創(chuàng)新若干模式的實(shí)證研究[D];大連理工大學(xué);2010年

10 朱澤輝;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與制造業(yè)的產(chǎn)業(yè)關(guān)聯(lián)分析[D];天津商業(yè)大學(xué);2010年

本文編號(hào)：2139119