本文選題：生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)FDI + 新經(jīng)濟(jì)地理學(xué)�。� 參考：《東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)作為一個(gè)特殊的產(chǎn)業(yè)群起源于20世紀(jì)60年代,是企業(yè)為了優(yōu)化資源配置而從傳統(tǒng)的制造業(yè)部門中所分離出來的,其服務(wù)對(duì)象是國民經(jīng)濟(jì)的其他生產(chǎn)部門,本質(zhì)上是一種生產(chǎn)資料。生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)是為產(chǎn)業(yè)升級(jí)以及生產(chǎn)效率的提高提供保障服務(wù)的服務(wù)行業(yè),其發(fā)展對(duì)我國優(yōu)化產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)和整合產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈,在更高層次上參與全球競(jìng)爭及合作起著至關(guān)重要的作用。本文通過計(jì)算服務(wù)業(yè)各部門的中間需求率與中間投入的產(chǎn)業(yè)流向重新定義了生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的內(nèi)涵,包括交通運(yùn)輸、倉儲(chǔ)和郵政業(yè);批發(fā)和零售業(yè);金融業(yè);信息傳輸、計(jì)算機(jī)服務(wù)和軟件業(yè);租賃和商務(wù)服務(wù)業(yè)以及科學(xué)研究、技術(shù)服務(wù)和地質(zhì)勘查業(yè)等6個(gè)行業(yè)。我國生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)增加值規(guī)模不斷擴(kuò)大,對(duì)GDP的貢獻(xiàn)率自2005年起穩(wěn)步上升,截止2015年生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)對(duì)GDP的貢獻(xiàn)率已達(dá)到30%,但與發(fā)達(dá)國家仍存在顯著差距,并且我國的生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)存在著行業(yè)及地區(qū)發(fā)展差異大的情況。從行業(yè)上來看,批發(fā)零售與交通運(yùn)輸、倉儲(chǔ)和郵政業(yè)、金融業(yè)增加值規(guī)模較大,而信息和科研部門等技術(shù)密集型以及人力資本密集型行業(yè)的發(fā)展較為緩慢,且增加值規(guī)模較小,說明我國生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的發(fā)展仍然集中在較為傳統(tǒng)、低端的部門。從地區(qū)發(fā)展上來看,東部地區(qū)的生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)產(chǎn)值在地區(qū)GDP中所占的比重明顯高于中部和西部地區(qū)。FDI作為推動(dòng)產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的重要途徑,能夠在促進(jìn)我國不同地區(qū)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展的同時(shí)推動(dòng)地區(qū)產(chǎn)業(yè),尤其是制造業(yè)的轉(zhuǎn)型升級(jí)。而我國生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)FDI的現(xiàn)階段發(fā)展情況存在著與產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展相同的問題,雖然規(guī)模不斷上漲,但是主要集中在批發(fā)零售等傳統(tǒng)部門,并且呈現(xiàn)出比產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展更為嚴(yán)重的地區(qū)差異,流入我國的生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)FDI有79%左右集中在東部地區(qū),而中西部地區(qū)只利用了其中的21%左右。因此,整合地區(qū)優(yōu)勢(shì),讓各省市地區(qū)的生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)最大程度地取長補(bǔ)短以更好地吸引并利用外資,對(duì)我國生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的發(fā)展非常重要�；谝陨显�,本文將在已有的研究成果基礎(chǔ)上,通過實(shí)證研究與理論分析相結(jié)合的方式,探討影響生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)FDI在我國進(jìn)行區(qū)位選擇的因素。在理論部分,本文將立足于新經(jīng)濟(jì)地理學(xué),將理論主要模型中所涉及的本地市場(chǎng)放大效應(yīng)、路徑依賴以及循環(huán)累積因果關(guān)系等經(jīng)濟(jì)活動(dòng)集聚的三大自我強(qiáng)化效應(yīng)與生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)FDI在空間上的集聚相結(jié)合,重點(diǎn)探討三大作用機(jī)制背后所反映出的市場(chǎng)規(guī)模、路徑依賴、產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚、技術(shù)外溢、成本以及傳統(tǒng)制度因素對(duì)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)FDI區(qū)位選擇的影響;在實(shí)證部分,選取理論部分所總結(jié)出的因素相對(duì)應(yīng)的指標(biāo),分別對(duì)全國、東部、中西部地區(qū)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)FDI的區(qū)位選擇進(jìn)行實(shí)證研究,嘗試分析相同因素對(duì)不同地區(qū)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)FDI區(qū)位選擇影響因素的作用差異。通過實(shí)證分析理論部分所提出的因素基本得到驗(yàn)證,但同時(shí)發(fā)現(xiàn)影響生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)FDI在全國、東部、中西部地區(qū)進(jìn)行區(qū)位選擇的因素存在顯著差異,具體表現(xiàn)在,滯后一期制造業(yè)FDI、GDP水平、基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施完善程度、工資水平與全國范圍內(nèi)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)FDI正相關(guān);滯后一期制造業(yè)FDI、GDP水平、地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)開放程度與東部地區(qū)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)FDI正相關(guān),經(jīng)濟(jì)市場(chǎng)化程度與東部地區(qū)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)FDI負(fù)相關(guān);滯后一期制造業(yè)FDI、基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施完善程度、經(jīng)濟(jì)市場(chǎng)化程度與中西部地區(qū)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)FDI正相關(guān)。最后立足于實(shí)證分析結(jié)果以及我國發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀,分別從全國以及地區(qū)層面上提出相應(yīng)對(duì)策建議。
[Abstract]:The productive service industry, as a special industrial group, originated in 1960s, was separated from the traditional manufacturing sector in order to optimize the allocation of resources. Its service object is the other production departments of the national economy, which is essentially a kind of production data. The productive service industry is for industrial upgrading and production efficiency. To improve the service industry which provides the guarantee service, its development plays a vital role in optimizing the industrial structure and integrating the industrial chain and participating in the global competition and cooperation at a higher level. This paper redefines the connotation of the productive service industry by calculating the intermediate demand rate of the various departments of the service industry and the industrial flow of the intermediate input. Including transportation, warehousing and postal services; wholesale and retail industry; financial industry; information transmission, computer services and software industry; leasing and business services and 6 industries, such as scientific research, technical services and geological exploration. The increasing value of the value-added service industry in our country has been expanding, and the contribution rate to GDP has risen steadily since 2005, up to 2015. The contribution rate of the productive service industry to GDP has reached 30% in the year, but there is still a significant gap with the developed countries, and there is a big difference in the industrial and regional development of our productive service industry. From the industry point of view, wholesale and retail and transportation, warehousing and postal industry, golden thaw are larger, and information and scientific research departments and so on. The development of technology intensive and human capital intensive industries is slow and the value added is small. It shows that the development of our productive service industry is still concentrated in the more traditional and low end sectors. From the regional development, the proportion of the productive service industry in the eastern region is obviously higher than that of the central and western regions in the eastern region. As an important way to promote industrial development, regional.FDI can promote the development of productive service industry in different regions of our country, and promote the transformation and upgrading of regional industries, especially the manufacturing industry. However, the current development of FDI in our productive service industry has the same problem with the industrial development, although the scale is rising, but it is the main factor. We should concentrate on the traditional departments such as wholesale and retail and other traditional sectors, and show a more serious regional difference than the industrial development. About 79% of the productive service industry FDI in China are concentrated in the eastern region, while the central and western regions only use about 21% of them. Therefore, the integration of regional advantages makes the production service industry in the provinces and municipalities to the greatest extent. It is very important for the development of our productive service industry to attract and use foreign capital better. Based on the above reasons, this paper will discuss the factors affecting the location selection of FDI in our country by combining the existing research results and the theoretical analysis. Based on the new economic geography, the three major self strengthening effects of the local market amplification effect, path dependence and cyclic cumulative causality, which are involved in the main theoretical models, are combined with the agglomeration of FDI in the productive service industry in space, and the market reflects the market behind the three major mechanisms. Scale, path dependence, industrial agglomeration, technology spillover, cost and the influence of traditional institutional factors on the location selection of FDI in the production service industry. In the empirical part, the empirical research on the location selection of FDI in the production service industry of the country, the East and the central and western regions is empirically studied. Analysis of the effects of the same factors on the factors affecting the location selection of FDI in different regions. The factors proposed by the empirical analysis are basically verified, but at the same time, it is found that there are significant differences in the factors affecting the location selection of FDI in the production service industry in the country, the East and the central and western regions. The latter phase of manufacturing industry FDI, GDP level, infrastructure improvement, wage level and FDI of productive service industry in the whole country are positively related, FDI, GDP level of manufacturing industry lags behind, regional economic openness is positively related to FDI of productive service industry in eastern region, and economic marketization is negatively related to FDI in Eastern productive service industry; lagging behind. FDI of the manufacturing industry, the degree of infrastructure improvement, the degree of economic marketization and the FDI of productive service industry in the central and western regions are positively related. Finally, based on the results of empirical analysis and the current situation of China's development, the corresponding countermeasures and suggestions are put forward from the national and regional level.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：F719

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 程姍姍;;我國制造業(yè)FDI與生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)FDI的互動(dòng)關(guān)系——基于省際面板數(shù)據(jù)的實(shí)證研究[J];中國經(jīng)貿(mào)導(dǎo)刊;2014年08期

2 朱正浩;;全球生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)FDI的新趨勢(shì)與我國的戰(zhàn)略選擇[J];科技管理研究;2013年17期

3 閻大穎;;中國企業(yè)對(duì)外直接投資的區(qū)位選擇及其決定因素[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2013年07期

4 邱靈;;北京市生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)空間結(jié)構(gòu)演化機(jī)理研究[J];中國軟科學(xué);2013年05期

5 楊仁發(fā);劉純彬;;中國生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)FDI影響因素實(shí)證研究[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2012年11期

6 王碩;;FDI與中國服務(wù)業(yè)集聚的發(fā)展——基于行業(yè)層面數(shù)據(jù)的分析[J];國際經(jīng)濟(jì)合作;2012年05期

7 原毅軍;李軍;;國際產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移與中國生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)升級(jí)——基于承接高端制造業(yè)國際轉(zhuǎn)移視角[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2011年04期

8 盛壘;;跨國公司在華R&D的空間集聚機(jī)制研究——基于新經(jīng)濟(jì)地理學(xué)視角的實(shí)證分析[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2010年04期

9 徐雪;;FDI在中國的區(qū)位選擇——對(duì)FDI地區(qū)不平衡的實(shí)證分析[J];貴州財(cái)經(jīng)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期

10 劉作麗;賀燦飛;;在華外商直接投資區(qū)位研究述評(píng)[J];地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2009年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：2085286