本文選題：金融發(fā)展 + 服務(wù)業(yè)增長��； 參考：《大連理工大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：20世紀60年代開始,服務(wù)業(yè)逐漸成為世界主要發(fā)達國家經(jīng)濟增長的主導(dǎo)力量,各國產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)也呈現(xiàn)出"工業(yè)型經(jīng)濟”向“服務(wù)型經(jīng)濟”轉(zhuǎn)型的總趨勢。一直以來,我國政府都予以服務(wù)業(yè)高度重視,將加快發(fā)展服務(wù)業(yè)作為制定各項經(jīng)濟政策的重要導(dǎo)向。但是,多項促進服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展的政策并沒有完全達到預(yù)期效果,我國服務(wù)業(yè)增長速度仍然相對緩慢,在三次產(chǎn)業(yè)中的比重仍然相對較低。因此,探討服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展緩慢的原因及促進服務(wù)業(yè)加速發(fā)展的方法,受到了中國學(xué)術(shù)界的廣泛關(guān)注。 已有大量文獻證明了金融發(fā)展對以工業(yè)為主導(dǎo)的經(jīng)濟增長水平的促進作用,但關(guān)于金融發(fā)展對服務(wù)業(yè)增長影響的研究有限。這主要是因為在已有研究所處的時期中,工業(yè)是實體經(jīng)濟增長的主要拉動力。然而,在世界經(jīng)濟發(fā)展逐漸由以工業(yè)為主導(dǎo)向以服務(wù)業(yè)為主導(dǎo)轉(zhuǎn)變的情況下,研究金融發(fā)展對服務(wù)業(yè)增長的影響將具有重要的現(xiàn)實意義。 本文結(jié)合服務(wù)業(yè)的本質(zhì)特征和資金需求特點,從提供差異化金融工具和服務(wù)、促進新企業(yè)進入和產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚以及支持中小規(guī)模企業(yè)發(fā)展等角度分析了一國或地區(qū)金融發(fā)展對服務(wù)業(yè)增長的作用機制。將整個服務(wù)業(yè)分為金融和非金融兩類部門,以金融部門規(guī)模、效率和結(jié)構(gòu)指標衡量金融發(fā)展水平,并將金融部門效率和結(jié)構(gòu)變化納入非金融部門的生產(chǎn)函數(shù)中,通過構(gòu)建兩部門模型,研究金融發(fā)展對服務(wù)業(yè)增長的直接帶動作用和間接溢出效應(yīng),并以2002-2010年我國31個省區(qū)的面板數(shù)據(jù)為樣本進行了實證檢驗,結(jié)果表明：(1)在服務(wù)業(yè)增長過程中,資本投入的邊際產(chǎn)出大于勞動投入的邊際產(chǎn)出,是促進服務(wù)業(yè)增長的主要投入要素；(2)金融部門規(guī)模擴張對服務(wù)業(yè)增長具有顯著帶動作用；(3)金融部門效率變化對服務(wù)業(yè)增長具有顯著的正向溢出效應(yīng),但溢出彈性較��；(4)以直接金融占比衡量的金融部門結(jié)構(gòu)調(diào)整對服務(wù)業(yè)增長具有顯著地負向溢出效應(yīng)。
[Abstract]:Since the 1960s, the service industry has gradually become the leading force in the economic growth of the world's major developed countries, and the industrial structure of various countries has also shown the general trend of the transformation from "industrial economy" to "service-oriented economy". Our government has always attached great importance to the service industry and made the development of the service industry an important guide for formulating various economic policies. However, many policies to promote the development of the service industry have not completely achieved the expected results. The growth rate of the service industry in China is still relatively slow, and the proportion in the three industries is still relatively low. Therefore, the reasons for the slow development of the service industry and the methods to accelerate the development of the service industry have received extensive attention from the Chinese academic circles. A large number of literatures have proved that financial development can promote the level of industry-led economic growth, but the research on the impact of financial development on the growth of service industry is limited. This is mainly because industry was the main driver of real-economy growth during the period of existence. However, under the circumstances that the world economy is gradually changing from industry-oriented to service-oriented, it is of great practical significance to study the impact of financial development on the growth of service industry. This paper combines the essential characteristics of the service industry and the characteristics of capital demand, from the provision of differentiated financial instruments and services, From the perspective of promoting the entry and agglomeration of new enterprises and supporting the development of small and medium-sized enterprises, this paper analyzes the mechanism of the financial development of a country or region on the growth of service industry. Dividing the entire service sector into financial and non-financial sectors, measuring the level of financial development in terms of financial sector size, efficiency and structural indicators, and integrating financial sector efficiency and structural changes into non-financial sector production functions, By constructing a two-sector model, this paper studies the direct and indirect spillover effects of financial development on the growth of the service industry, and takes the panel data of 31 provinces and regions in China from 2002 to 2010 as a sample to conduct an empirical test. The result shows that the marginal output of capital input is larger than the marginal output of labor input in the process of service industry growth. It is the main input factor to promote the growth of the service industry. (2) the scale expansion of the financial sector has a significant driving effect on the growth of the service industry. 3) the change of the efficiency of the financial sector has a significant positive spillover effect on the growth of the service industry. However, the spillover elasticity is relatively small. 4) the adjustment of financial sector structure measured by direct financial share has a significant negative spillover effect on the growth of service industry.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F832;F719;F224

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 郭文杰;;改革開放以來FDI、城市化對服務(wù)業(yè)的影響研究[J];財貿(mào)經(jīng)濟;2007年04期

2 田侃;馬曉潔;段娜娣;;我國信用環(huán)境與現(xiàn)代服務(wù)業(yè)耦合關(guān)系的定量研究[J];財貿(mào)經(jīng)濟;2010年04期

3 張小蒂;王永齊;;企業(yè)家顯現(xiàn)與產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚:金融市場的聯(lián)結(jié)效應(yīng)[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2010年05期

4 王志鵬,李子奈;外資對中國工業(yè)企業(yè)生產(chǎn)效率的影響研究[J];管理世界;2003年04期

5 楊龍;胡曉珍;;金融發(fā)展規(guī)模、效率改善與經(jīng)濟增長[J];經(jīng)濟科學(xué);2011年01期

6 孫曉華;田曉芳;;裝備制造業(yè)技術(shù)進步的溢出效應(yīng)——基于兩部門模型的實證研究[J];經(jīng)濟學(xué)(季刊);2011年01期

7 汪德華;張再金;白重恩;;政府規(guī)模、法治水平與服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展[J];經(jīng)濟研究;2007年06期

8 林毅夫;孫希芳;姜燁;;經(jīng)濟發(fā)展中的最優(yōu)金融結(jié)構(gòu)理論初探[J];經(jīng)濟研究;2009年08期

9 蔡躍洲;郭梅軍;;我國上市商業(yè)銀行全要素生產(chǎn)率的實證分析[J];經(jīng)濟研究;2009年09期

10 江小涓;;服務(wù)業(yè)增長:真實含義、多重影響和發(fā)展趨勢[J];經(jīng)濟研究;2011年04期

，

本文編號：1799280