本文選題：科技服務(wù)業(yè)　切入點(diǎn)：產(chǎn)品部門分類　出處：《浙江工商大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來,作為非國民經(jīng)濟(jì)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)行業(yè)的科技服務(wù)業(yè)在社會(huì)各界受到越來越廣泛的關(guān)注,國家與地方政府紛紛制定科技服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展政策文件,不僅要求大力發(fā)展科技服務(wù)業(yè),同時(shí)對(duì)科技服務(wù)業(yè)的信息提出需求。而目前國內(nèi)科技服務(wù)業(yè)統(tǒng)計(jì)實(shí)踐工作開展的十分不一致,主要表現(xiàn)為：不明確科技服務(wù)業(yè)統(tǒng)計(jì)的對(duì)象以及科技服務(wù)業(yè)統(tǒng)計(jì)應(yīng)反映的信息。在如此背景下,學(xué)界對(duì)科技服務(wù)業(yè)的研究卻極少。本文基于科技服務(wù)業(yè)統(tǒng)計(jì)的客觀現(xiàn)實(shí),開展科技服務(wù)業(yè)的界定研究以及科技服務(wù)業(yè)統(tǒng)計(jì)指標(biāo)體系研究,以期為開展科技服務(wù)業(yè)統(tǒng)計(jì)工作提供新思路。 首先,界定科技服務(wù)業(yè)。通過開展科技服務(wù)業(yè)屬性研究、統(tǒng)計(jì)目的研究以及國外相關(guān)專題統(tǒng)計(jì)研究,確定科技服務(wù)業(yè)的界定應(yīng)以科技服務(wù)活動(dòng)為出發(fā)點(diǎn),以國民經(jīng)濟(jì)核算“產(chǎn)品部門分類”為原則,從而通過明確科技服務(wù)活動(dòng)確定科技服務(wù)業(yè)的內(nèi)涵。進(jìn)一步地,基于國民經(jīng)濟(jì)核算理論與科技服務(wù)業(yè)的內(nèi)涵,就當(dāng)前科技服務(wù)業(yè)爭議內(nèi)容開展系統(tǒng)研究并做歸屬判斷,同時(shí)明確基于產(chǎn)品部門分類的科技服務(wù)業(yè)邊界。在此礎(chǔ)礎(chǔ)上,以服務(wù)內(nèi)容為分類標(biāo)準(zhǔn),將科技服務(wù)業(yè)內(nèi)部結(jié)構(gòu)分為四個(gè)層次并與國民經(jīng)濟(jì)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)行業(yè)分類形成對(duì)接。即通過“內(nèi)涵-邊界-內(nèi)部分類”三方面的研究,明確什么是科技服務(wù)業(yè)。 其次,明確統(tǒng)計(jì)指標(biāo)體系。通過開展產(chǎn)業(yè)信息統(tǒng)計(jì)指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)建的一般規(guī)范以及科技服務(wù)業(yè)信息統(tǒng)計(jì)特殊需求的研究,明確科技服務(wù)業(yè)統(tǒng)計(jì)指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)建的依據(jù)與原則。在此基礎(chǔ)上,研究政府宏觀管理的決策需求,社會(huì)大眾與理論研究者的信息需求,以及未來可能的潛在信息需求,明確科技服務(wù)業(yè)統(tǒng)計(jì)指標(biāo)體系包括投入、產(chǎn)出兩大內(nèi)容模塊,并進(jìn)一步明確各模塊的具體統(tǒng)計(jì)指標(biāo),從而建立反映科技服務(wù)業(yè)信息需求的統(tǒng)計(jì)指標(biāo)體系。 然后,通過開展科技服務(wù)業(yè)統(tǒng)計(jì)指標(biāo)基礎(chǔ)數(shù)據(jù)收集與匯總實(shí)施方案的研究,論證本文設(shè)計(jì)的科技服務(wù)業(yè)統(tǒng)計(jì)指標(biāo)體系的可行性。 最后,針對(duì)本文的研究結(jié)果,從統(tǒng)計(jì)對(duì)象、統(tǒng)計(jì)內(nèi)容與資料獲取三方面對(duì)科技服務(wù)業(yè)統(tǒng)計(jì)工作提出了相關(guān)對(duì)策建議,并指出本文研究的局限與未來的展望。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the science and technology service industry, which is not the standard industry of national economy, has received more and more attention from all walks of life. The national and local governments have formulated policy documents for the development of science and technology service industry, which not only require the development of science and technology service industry.At the same time, the information of science and technology service industry needs.At present, the statistical practice of science and technology service industry in China is very inconsistent, mainly as follows: the object of statistics of science and technology service industry and the information that should be reflected in the statistics of science and technology service industry.In this context, the academic research on science and technology service industry is very little.Based on the objective reality of science and technology service industry statistics, this paper studies the definition of science and technology service industry and the statistical index system of science and technology service industry, in order to provide a new way of thinking for the development of science and technology service industry statistics.First, define the science and technology service industry.Through the research on the attribute of science and technology service industry, the research of statistical purpose and the statistical research of relevant foreign topics, it is determined that the definition of science and technology service industry should be based on the scientific and technological service activities as the starting point and the product sector classification of national economic accounting as the principle.So as to determine the connotation of science and technology service industry through clear science and technology service activities.Furthermore, based on the theory of national economic accounting and the connotation of science and technology service industry, this paper makes a systematic research on the contents of the current scientific and technological service industry dispute and makes the attribution judgment.On the basis of this, the internal structure of science and technology service industry is divided into four levels with the service content as the classification standard, and it is connected with the standard industry classification of the national economy.Namely, through the study of "intension-boundary-internal classification", it is clear what is science and technology service industry.Secondly, a clear statistical index system.Through the research on the general norms of the construction of the index system of industrial information statistics and the research on the special needs of the information statistics of the scientific and technological service industry, the basis and principle of the construction of the statistical index system of the scientific and technological service industry are clarified.On this basis, this paper studies the decision-making needs of government macro management, the information needs of the public and theoretical researchers, as well as the potential information needs in the future, and clarifies that the statistical index system of science and technology service industry includes two major modules: input and output.Furthermore, the specific statistical indexes of each module are clarified, and the statistical index system reflecting the information demand of the scientific and technological service industry is established.Then, the feasibility of the statistical index system of scientific and technological service industry is demonstrated through the research on the basic data collection and collection scheme of the statistical index of science and technology service industry.Finally, in view of the research results of this paper, the author puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions on the statistical work of science and technology service industry from three aspects of statistical object, statistical content and data acquisition, and points out the limitations of this study and the prospect of the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江工商大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：F224;F719

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃孝華;;關(guān)于研發(fā)產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)涵和外延的重新界定[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;2012年04期

2 丹尼爾·馬爾金;發(fā)展科技指標(biāo),促進(jìn)政策的分析和評(píng)估(續(xù))——OECD的經(jīng)驗(yàn)[J];科技管理研究;2003年04期

3 陳巖峰;于文靜;;基于因子分析法的廣東科技服務(wù)業(yè)服務(wù)能力研究[J];科技管理研究;2009年09期

4 孟慶敏;梅強(qiáng);;科技服務(wù)業(yè)在區(qū)域創(chuàng)新系統(tǒng)中的功能定位與運(yùn)行機(jī)理研究[J];科技管理研究;2010年08期

5 王晶;于建宇;劉會(huì)寧;趙楠;張文利;郭玉明;;南京科技服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展問題研究[J];科技進(jìn)步與對(duì)策;2006年03期

6 王永順;;加快發(fā)展科技服務(wù)業(yè) 提升創(chuàng)新創(chuàng)業(yè)服務(wù)水平[J];江蘇科技信息;2005年08期

7 張珍;;關(guān)于科技服務(wù)業(yè)統(tǒng)計(jì)健全性發(fā)展的探討[J];江蘇科技信息;2008年10期

8 王晶;譚清美;黃西川;;科技服務(wù)業(yè)系統(tǒng)功能分析[J];科學(xué)學(xué)與科學(xué)技術(shù)管理;2006年06期

9 朱衛(wèi)東;譚清美;;基于系統(tǒng)構(gòu)成要素功能的科技服務(wù)業(yè)評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系研究[J];科學(xué)學(xué)研究;2008年S2期

10 史文瑞;聯(lián)邦德國的科技統(tǒng)計(jì)[J];全球科技經(jīng)濟(jì)w，

本文編號(hào)：1704708