本文選題：生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)　切入點：制造業(yè)　出處：《浙江理工大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)作為一種重要的新興產(chǎn)業(yè)，將是浙江經(jīng)濟的一個新增長點。生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)作為中間投入，為制造業(yè)提供相應(yīng)的要素和服務(wù)。從產(chǎn)業(yè)互動的角度來看，生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的 外部化‖可以促進制造業(yè)企業(yè)不斷降低生產(chǎn)成本，從而提高制造業(yè)的生產(chǎn)水平；而制造業(yè)通過不斷吸納生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)提供的要素和服務(wù)而快速發(fā)展，，于是為生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)提供了潛在的市場和發(fā)展空間。那么，對于生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)迅速崛起、制造業(yè)競爭優(yōu)勢明顯的浙江省，兩者之間的互動程度究竟如何？這是一個值得探討的問題。 社會分工揭示了生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與制造業(yè)發(fā)展的內(nèi)在機制，它意味著生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與制造業(yè)在一定條件下通過要素投入的優(yōu)化配置而相互促進。但縱觀大量研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，從產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)部要素再分配入手研究兩者互動的文獻并不見多�；诖�，本文從生產(chǎn)要素分解與重組的微觀視角研究浙江省生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與制造業(yè)的互動關(guān)系。 首先，根據(jù)浙江省生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與制造業(yè)發(fā)展的特征，提出了兩者互動的三個理論假說。其次，從微觀角度研究生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與制造業(yè)的互動機理，具體以柯布-道格拉斯生產(chǎn)函數(shù)為藍(lán)本，通過勞動和資本兩種可變要素結(jié)構(gòu)的分解與重構(gòu)，建立共生狀態(tài)下生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與制造業(yè)產(chǎn)出規(guī)模的聯(lián)立方程模型，并討論兩者互動的前提條件及形式。然后，以浙江省生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)和制造業(yè)的數(shù)據(jù)為樣本，從制造業(yè)整體和分行業(yè)兩個層面進行實證檢驗。 實證結(jié)果充分肯定了互動的三個假說，本文結(jié)論表現(xiàn)為以下四點：(1)浙江省生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與制造業(yè)整體的互動效應(yīng)較強；(2)制造業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的高級化有助于增強生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)對制造業(yè)發(fā)展的正向效應(yīng)，生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)的升級也提高了制造業(yè)對生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展的正向效應(yīng)；(3)這種互動關(guān)系主要表現(xiàn)在生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與資本密集型或技術(shù)密集型制造業(yè)之間，與勞動密集型制造業(yè)的互動并不積極；(4)生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)對較高端制造業(yè)的推動力強于較低端的制造業(yè)，而資本含量高的制造業(yè)對生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的拉動力強于資本含量低的制造業(yè)。
[Abstract]:Producer services, as an important emerging industry, will be a new growth point of Zhejiang economy. As an intermediate input, producer services will provide corresponding elements and services for manufacturing. The externalization of producer services can promote manufacturing enterprises to continuously reduce production costs and thus improve the level of manufacturing, while manufacturing develops rapidly by continuously absorbing the elements and services provided by producer services. Therefore, it provides potential market and development space for producer services. What is the degree of interaction between the producer services and Zhejiang Province, where the rapid rise of producer services and the obvious competitive advantage of manufacturing industry? This is a problem worth exploring. The social division of labor reveals the internal mechanism of the development of producer service industry and manufacturing industry, which means that producer service industry and manufacturing industry promote each other through the optimal allocation of factor input under certain conditions. There are few literatures to study the interaction between the two from the perspective of internal factor redistribution. Based on this, this paper studies the interaction between producer service industry and manufacturing industry in Zhejiang Province from the microcosmic perspective of factorization and reorganization of factors of production. Firstly, according to the characteristics of the development of producer services and manufacturing industry in Zhejiang Province, three theoretical hypotheses of interaction between producer services and manufacturing industry are put forward. Secondly, the interaction mechanism between producer services and manufacturing industry is studied from a micro perspective. Taking the Cobb-Douglas production function as the blueprint, by decomposing and reconstructing the structure of two variable elements of labor and capital, the simultaneous equation model of the production scale of producer service industry and manufacturing industry in symbiotic state is established. Then, taking the data of producer services and manufacturing industry in Zhejiang Province as a sample, the empirical test is carried out from the two levels of manufacturing industry as a whole and sub-industries. The empirical results fully confirm the three hypotheses of interaction. The conclusion of this paper is as follows: 1) the interaction between producer services and manufacturing industry in Zhejiang Province is stronger. 2) the advanced industrial structure of manufacturing industry helps to enhance the positive effect of producer services on the development of manufacturing industry. The upgrading of the industrial structure of producer services also enhances the positive effect of manufacturing on the development of producer services. The interaction between producer services and capital-intensive or technology-intensive manufacturing industries is the main manifestation of the interaction between producer services and capital-intensive or technology-intensive manufacturing industries. The interaction with the labor-intensive manufacturing industry is not active. 4) the producer service industry is stronger than the lower end manufacturing industry in driving force, and the high capital content manufacturing industry is stronger than the low capital content manufacturing industry.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：F424;F719

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 邱靈;申玉銘;任旺兵;;北京生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與制造業(yè)的關(guān)聯(lián)及空間分布[J];地理學(xué)報;2008年12期

2 陳立敏,譚力文;評價中國制造業(yè)國際競爭力的實證方法研究——兼與波特指標(biāo)及產(chǎn)業(yè)分類法比較[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2004年05期

3 顧乃華;;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)對工業(yè)獲利能力的影響和渠道——基于城市面板數(shù)據(jù)和SFA模型的實證研究[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2010年05期

4 陳建軍;陳菁菁;;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與制造業(yè)的協(xié)同定位研究——以浙江省69個城市和地區(qū)為例[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2011年06期

5 高覺民;李曉慧;;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與制造業(yè)的互動機理:理論與實證[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2011年06期

6 張世賢;工業(yè)投資效率與產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)變動的實證研究——兼與郭克莎博士商榷[J];管理世界;2000年05期

7 陳建軍;陳國亮;黃潔;;新經(jīng)濟地理學(xué)視角下的生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)集聚及其影響因素研究——來自中國222個城市的經(jīng)驗證據(jù)[J];管理世界;2009年04期

8 江靜;劉志彪;于明超;;生產(chǎn)者服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展與制造業(yè)效率提升:基于地區(qū)和行業(yè)面板數(shù)據(jù)的經(jīng)驗分析[J];世界經(jīng)濟;2007年08期

9 馮泰文;;生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)的發(fā)展對制造業(yè)效率的影響——以交易成本和制造成本為中介變量[J];數(shù)量經(jīng)濟技術(shù)經(jīng)濟研究;2009年03期

10 劉兵權(quán);王耀中;;分工、現(xiàn)代生產(chǎn)性服務(wù)業(yè)與高端制造業(yè)發(fā)展[J];山西財經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2010年11期

本文編號：1608422