本文關(guān)鍵詞： 金融服務(wù)業(yè) 空間格局 影響因素 中國(guó)　出處：《首都師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：金融服務(wù)業(yè)與經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展具有密不可分的聯(lián)系,世界范圍內(nèi)經(jīng)濟(jì)金融化趨勢(shì)日益明顯,金融服務(wù)業(yè)已成為現(xiàn)代服務(wù)經(jīng)濟(jì)的核心。由于金融服務(wù)業(yè)在我國(guó)國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)中具有舉足輕重的地位,對(duì)金融服務(wù)業(yè)的空間研究具有重要意義。本文從省級(jí)尺度和地級(jí)尺度對(duì)中國(guó)金融服務(wù)業(yè)及其內(nèi)部的細(xì)分行業(yè)銀行業(yè)、保險(xiǎn)業(yè)和證券業(yè)的空間格局進(jìn)行研究,并探討了省級(jí)金融服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展水平的影響因素。有助于明確中國(guó)金融服務(wù)業(yè)及其內(nèi)部各行業(yè)發(fā)展水平的空間格局、空間差異程度及影響因素,為優(yōu)化金融資源的空間配置提供借鑒。 第一章闡述選題的背景、意義、研究方法和技術(shù)路線等內(nèi)容。第二章梳理國(guó)內(nèi)外金融服務(wù)業(yè)空間研究的成果。第三章基于中國(guó)金融年鑒以及銀監(jiān)會(huì)、保監(jiān)會(huì)和證監(jiān)會(huì)的數(shù)據(jù)對(duì)中國(guó)金融服務(wù)業(yè)及其內(nèi)部的銀行、保險(xiǎn)和證券業(yè)的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)歸納。 第四、五章主要以中國(guó)金融年鑒和中國(guó)城市統(tǒng)計(jì)年鑒的數(shù)據(jù)為基礎(chǔ),以GIS軟件為平臺(tái),分別對(duì)中國(guó)各省級(jí)行政區(qū)和地級(jí)市的金融服務(wù)業(yè)及其內(nèi)部的細(xì)分行業(yè)銀行、保險(xiǎn)和證券業(yè)發(fā)展水平的空間格局及差異性進(jìn)行分析。主要結(jié)論有(1)在省級(jí)尺度,金融服務(wù)業(yè)整體空間格局呈“T”字形分布,縱軸為沿海帶,橫軸為沿長(zhǎng)江帶,縱軸發(fā)展水平明顯高于橫軸,以北京、上海、廣東為最；銀行業(yè)呈“中部塌陷”空間格局,主要集聚在西部集聚帶、東南沿海集聚帶和環(huán)渤海集聚帶；保險(xiǎn)業(yè)呈“A”型格局,兩條長(zhǎng)軸為“胡煥庸線”附近的集聚帶和東部沿海帶,短軸為沿長(zhǎng)江帶；證券業(yè)東部獨(dú)大,屬于中等水平以上的僅有北京、上海、廣東、浙江、江蘇五省市。(2)在地級(jí)尺度,發(fā)達(dá)和較發(fā)達(dá)的金融服務(wù)中心主要在東部,中部次之,西部最少；不同類型金融服務(wù)業(yè)均呈集群式分布,銀行業(yè)和保險(xiǎn)業(yè)發(fā)達(dá)和較發(fā)達(dá)的中心數(shù)量較多,整體發(fā)育水平較成熟；證券業(yè)屬于發(fā)達(dá)和較發(fā)達(dá)的城市數(shù)量很少,高度集中于上海、北京、深圳、廣州、杭州和成都。一般城市規(guī)模等級(jí)越高,其金融服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展水平越高,巨大型城市的金融服務(wù)業(yè)及其內(nèi)部銀行、保險(xiǎn)、證券業(yè)的發(fā)展水平明顯高于其他規(guī)模等級(jí)城市同類行業(yè)的發(fā)展水平,例外的是西部特大城市的金融服務(wù)業(yè)及其內(nèi)部銀行、保險(xiǎn)、證券業(yè)的發(fā)展水平均低于西部的巨大型城市。 第六章對(duì)影響省級(jí)金融服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展水平空間格局的因素進(jìn)行回歸分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)二、三產(chǎn)業(yè)比重、城市化水平、政府干預(yù)水平、所有制結(jié)構(gòu)是影響金融服務(wù)業(yè)發(fā)展的主要原因。第七章是本文的主要研究結(jié)論與不足。
[Abstract]:The financial service industry is inextricably related to economic development, and the trend of economic financialization in the world is becoming more and more obvious. The financial service industry has become the core of the modern service economy. It is of great significance to study the space of financial service industry. This paper studies the spatial pattern of banking, insurance and securities industry in China from provincial scale and prefectural scale. The paper also discusses the influencing factors of the development level of provincial financial service industry, which is helpful to clarify the spatial pattern, spatial difference degree and influencing factors of the development level of China's financial service industry and its internal industries. To optimize the spatial allocation of financial resources to provide reference. The first chapter describes the background, significance, research methods and technical route of the topic. The second chapter combs the domestic and foreign financial services research achievements. Chapter three is based on the China Financial Yearbook and the Banking Regulatory Commission. The data from the Insurance Regulatory Commission and the Securities Regulatory Commission make a statistical summary of the current situation of the development of China's financial services industry and its internal banking, insurance and securities industries. In 4th, five chapters are mainly based on the data of China Financial Yearbook and China City Statistical Yearbook, and on the platform of GIS software, the financial service industry of provincial administrative region and prefectural city in China and its internal subdivision industry banks are analyzed respectively. The spatial pattern and difference of the development level of insurance and securities industry are analyzed. The main conclusions are as follows: on the provincial scale, the overall spatial pattern of financial service industry is "T" zigzag distribution, the vertical axis is coastal zone, and the horizontal axis is along the Yangtze River belt. The development level of the vertical axis is obviously higher than that of the horizontal axis, with Beijing, Shanghai and Guangdong as the most important ones, the banking industry showing a spatial pattern of "central collapse", mainly concentrated in the western agglomeration zone, the southeast coastal agglomeration zone and the Bohai sea ring agglomeration zone, and the insurance industry showing a "A" pattern. The two long axes are the agglomeration zone and the eastern coastal zone near the "Hu Huanyong line" and the short-axis along the Yangtze River belt; the securities industry is the largest in the eastern part, and only Beijing, Shanghai, Guangdong, Zhejiang and Jiangsu provinces, provinces, cities and provinces at or above the middle level are on the regional scale. The developed and more developed financial service centers are mainly in the east, the middle part is the second, the west is the least, the different types of financial services are clustered distribution, the banking and insurance industry developed and the more developed center number, the overall development level is more mature; The securities industry is a small number of developed and relatively developed cities, highly concentrated in Shanghai, Beijing, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Hangzhou and Chengdu. The higher the scale of the general city, the higher the level of development of the financial services industry. The level of development of the financial services industry and its internal banks, insurance, and securities industries in mega-cities is obviously higher than that of similar industries in other cities of a large scale, with the exception of the financial services industry and its internal banks and insurance in the western mega-cities. The level of development of the securities industry is lower than that of giant cities in the west. Chapter 6th makes regression analysis on the factors that affect the spatial pattern of the development level of provincial financial service industry, and finds that the proportion of the second and third industries, the level of urbanization, the level of government intervention, Ownership structure is the main reason that affects the development of financial service industry. Chapter 7th is the main conclusion and deficiency of this paper.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：首都師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F832;F719

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 宗良;王家強(qiáng);;中國(guó)銀行業(yè)與國(guó)際同業(yè)的優(yōu)勢(shì)、差距與對(duì)策——兼評(píng)2011年全球1000家大銀行排行榜[J];銀行家;2011年11期

2 秦池江;論金融產(chǎn)業(yè)與金融產(chǎn)業(yè)政策[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);1995年09期

3 陳躍剛;吳艷;;上海市金融服務(wù)業(yè)空間分布研究[J];城市問(wèn)題;2010年12期

4 付雙雙;;關(guān)于國(guó)外金融產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚的研究述評(píng)[J];太原城市職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年07期

5 姚戰(zhàn)琪;金融服務(wù)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)關(guān)聯(lián)度的比較研究[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2005年05期

6 張鳳超;金融產(chǎn)業(yè)成長(zhǎng)及其規(guī)律探討[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2003年10期

7 黃達(dá);金融、金融學(xué)及其學(xué)科建設(shè)(金融覆蓋范圍、金融學(xué)科體系設(shè)計(jì)、金融專業(yè)辦學(xué)方向)[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué);2001年04期

8 李小建;周雄飛;衛(wèi)春江;孔云峰;;發(fā)展中地區(qū)銀行業(yè)空間系統(tǒng)變化——以河南省為例[J];地理學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

9 林彰平;閆小培;;轉(zhuǎn)型期廣州市金融服務(wù)業(yè)的空間格局變動(dòng)[J];地理學(xué)報(bào);2006年08期

10 武巍;劉衛(wèi)東;劉毅;;中國(guó)地區(qū)銀行業(yè)金融系統(tǒng)的區(qū)域差異[J];地理學(xué)報(bào);2007年12期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 彭寶玉;中國(guó)銀行業(yè)空間系統(tǒng)變化及其地方效應(yīng)研究[D];河南大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 孫文娟;東部沿海省市區(qū)域金融發(fā)展差異研究[D];中國(guó)海洋大學(xué);2011年

2 劉蕾;中國(guó)金融產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚程度及影響因素的空間計(jì)量分析[D];蘭州商學(xué)院;2011年

3 李翠敏;城市銀行網(wǎng)點(diǎn)的空間分析[D];上海師范大學(xué);2005年

4 余源源;安徽省金融發(fā)展對(duì)產(chǎn)業(yè)升級(jí)支持作用的研究[D];合肥工業(yè)大學(xué);2009年

5 鄧秀麗;北京市金融服務(wù)業(yè)空間格局及其演變研究[D];首都師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1525792