【摘要】：隨著我國城市化進(jìn)程和新農(nóng)村的建設(shè),征地已經(jīng)成為我國的普遍現(xiàn)象。但與此同時(shí)也出現(xiàn)了很多問題。比如說征用農(nóng)用地價(jià)格補(bǔ)償不合理,拆遷農(nóng)村房屋沒有考慮到農(nóng)村居民的社會(huì)保障,低估了農(nóng)用地和農(nóng)村房屋的價(jià)格。評(píng)估理論和實(shí)踐的滯后,民群眾合法權(quán)益的有效保護(hù)。所以本文分別從征用農(nóng)用地和拆遷農(nóng)村房屋的角度出發(fā),找到適合這兩種情況的評(píng)估方法,具有極大的實(shí)踐意義。 對(duì)于農(nóng)征地的評(píng)估方法,通過采用兩種或兩種以上方法對(duì)農(nóng)用地征用價(jià)格進(jìn)行評(píng)估,并結(jié)合當(dāng)?shù)貙?shí)際情況對(duì)不同評(píng)估結(jié)果進(jìn)行分析,確定最后的估價(jià)結(jié)果。在本文中主要采用的是用社會(huì)價(jià)值量和城鎮(zhèn)基準(zhǔn)地價(jià)進(jìn)行農(nóng)征地的評(píng)估,得出的最終結(jié)果進(jìn)行比較發(fā)現(xiàn)接近實(shí)際征用價(jià)格,說明了這兩種方法的可行性。 對(duì)于農(nóng)村拆遷房屋的評(píng)估,主要是對(duì)照城鎮(zhèn)拆遷房屋的評(píng)估方法,最普遍和適用的是市場(chǎng)比較法。但是在采用市場(chǎng)比較法的過程中我們發(fā)現(xiàn),在影響可比實(shí)例的因素修正時(shí),帶有較大的主觀性。為了避免這種情況,在本文中引入了模糊數(shù)學(xué)模型,運(yùn)用德爾菲法(Delphi)即專家打分法確定特征因素的隸屬函數(shù)值,這樣更能客觀的求出待估房屋的價(jià)格,增加了精確性,對(duì)于改進(jìn)市場(chǎng)比較法具有重要的意義。 文章分為以下幾個(gè)部分：第一部分為引言,介紹了本文的引言、研究意義以及邏輯框架。第二部分為文獻(xiàn)綜述,回顧了國內(nèi)外關(guān)于評(píng)估農(nóng)用地和房地產(chǎn)的歷史發(fā)展進(jìn)程,對(duì)于國外的農(nóng)用地評(píng)價(jià)體系和房屋定量估價(jià)方法值得我們學(xué)習(xí),并且用在我國的實(shí)際情況中；第三部分介紹了農(nóng)用地分等定級(jí)的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)以及農(nóng)用地估價(jià)的方法,著重介紹了分等定級(jí)的步驟以及與農(nóng)用地估價(jià)的關(guān)系,并且介紹了關(guān)于農(nóng)用地價(jià)格的幾個(gè)概念,更好的說明了農(nóng)用地價(jià)格的構(gòu)成。第四部分通過舉例說明農(nóng)用地的估價(jià)方法并且做出了科學(xué)的比較。第五部分論述了拆遷房屋的估價(jià)方法以及改進(jìn)的市場(chǎng)比較法,并引進(jìn)了模糊數(shù)學(xué)模型,模糊集對(duì)認(rèn)知不確定的模糊概念和對(duì)象有著很好的處理效果,采用定量的計(jì)算房屋的價(jià)格更加合理,對(duì)于在實(shí)際情況下對(duì)拆遷房屋的補(bǔ)償提供了很好的依據(jù)。運(yùn)用改進(jìn)的市場(chǎng)比較法進(jìn)行案例分析并且和傳統(tǒng)的市場(chǎng)比較法進(jìn)行了比較分析；第六部分對(duì)文章進(jìn)行了總結(jié),提出了建議,并且說明了不足之處。 我們可以看出對(duì)于農(nóng)征地和拆遷房屋的估價(jià)方法我們有很多選擇,但以往的選擇通常是以定性分析為主,通過對(duì)估價(jià)方法的改進(jìn),引入數(shù)學(xué)模型,定量的評(píng)估農(nóng)征地和拆遷房屋的價(jià)格,對(duì)于補(bǔ)償價(jià)格奠定了一個(gè)科學(xué)合理的基礎(chǔ),對(duì)于保障農(nóng)民的權(quán)利以及我國經(jīng)濟(jì)的縱向發(fā)展具有極大的意義。
[Abstract]:With the process of urbanization and the construction of new countryside, land expropriation has become a common phenomenon in China. But at the same time, there are also a lot of problems. For example, the price compensation for expropriation of agricultural land is unreasonable, the demolition of rural houses does not take into account the social security of rural residents, and the price of agricultural land and rural houses is underestimated. Evaluation theory and practice lag, the effective protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the masses. Therefore, from the angle of expropriation of agricultural land and demolition of rural houses, this paper finds the evaluation methods suitable for these two situations, which has great practical significance. For the evaluation method of land expropriation, two or more methods are used to evaluate the expropriation price of agricultural land, and different evaluation results are analyzed according to the local conditions, and the final evaluation results are determined. In this paper, we mainly use the social value and the standard land price to evaluate the land expropriation. The final results are close to the actual expropriation price, which shows the feasibility of these two methods. The evaluation of rural house demolition is mainly compared with the evaluation method of urban house demolition, and the most common and applicable method is the market comparison method. However, in the process of adopting market comparison, we find that there is more subjectivity in the correction of factors affecting comparable examples. In order to avoid this kind of situation, the fuzzy mathematics model is introduced in this paper, and the membership function value of characteristic factor is determined by using Delphi method (Delphi), that is, expert scoring method, so that the price of house to be estimated can be calculated objectively and the accuracy is increased. It is of great significance to improve the market comparison method. The article is divided into the following parts: the first part is the introduction, the significance of the research and the logical framework. The second part is literature review, reviewing the historical development process of appraising agricultural land and real estate at home and abroad. The evaluation system of agricultural land and the method of house quantitative evaluation abroad are worth studying, and used in the actual situation of our country. The third part introduces the standard of agricultural land gradation and the method of agricultural land evaluation, especially introduces the steps of grading and the relationship with agricultural land evaluation, and introduces several concepts about agricultural land price. A better explanation of the composition of agricultural land prices. The fourth part illustrates the evaluation method of agricultural land and makes a scientific comparison. The fifth part discusses the evaluation method of the house demolition and the improved market comparison method, and introduces the fuzzy mathematical model. The fuzzy set has a good effect on the fuzzy concept and object of cognitive uncertainty. The quantitative calculation of housing price is more reasonable, which provides a good basis for the compensation of house demolition. The improved market comparison method is used for case analysis and comparative analysis with the traditional market comparison method. The sixth part summarizes the article, puts forward some suggestions, and explains the shortcomings. We can see that we have a lot of choices for the evaluation methods of land expropriation and house demolition, but the former choice is usually qualitative analysis, through the improvement of the evaluation method, the mathematical model is introduced. The quantitative evaluation of the price of land requisition and house demolition lays a scientific and reasonable foundation for the compensation price and is of great significance to the protection of farmers' rights and the vertical development of our country's economy.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F301.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張延輝;姜亞莉;;GIS技術(shù)在房地產(chǎn)估價(jià)中的實(shí)踐與應(yīng)用[J];北京測(cè)繪;2011年02期

2 倪紹祥,陳傳康;我國土地評(píng)價(jià)研究的近今進(jìn)展[J];地理學(xué)報(bào);1993年01期

3 何國松,趙曦,陳榮山;模糊數(shù)學(xué)在宗地估價(jià)中的應(yīng)用研究[J];國土資源科技管理;2004年01期

4 石群;探索城市房屋拆遷中被拆遷房屋的房地產(chǎn)市場(chǎng)評(píng)估價(jià)格[J];中國房地產(chǎn);2003年09期

5 蘇強(qiáng);農(nóng)地評(píng)估中土地評(píng)估方法的選擇及其應(yīng)用[J];甘肅農(nóng)業(yè);2005年07期

6 趙坤;;淺析收益法在農(nóng)業(yè)土地評(píng)估中的具體應(yīng)用[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)論壇;2009年18期

7 何小亞;傅武燕;;模糊數(shù)學(xué)方法在房地產(chǎn)定價(jià)中的應(yīng)用[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;2006年03期

8 曾繁偉;我國工程造價(jià)管理模式與國際慣例的對(duì)比分析[J];建筑經(jīng)濟(jì);2001年12期

9 楊宇東;;對(duì)城市房屋拆遷補(bǔ)償價(jià)格評(píng)估的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];建筑經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年10期

10 賈建設(shè);;談城市房屋拆遷補(bǔ)償價(jià)格的評(píng)估[J];科技信息;2009年17期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 潘錦華;付蕾;王敬波;張洪梅;;農(nóng)用地征用價(jià)格與城鎮(zhèn)基準(zhǔn)地價(jià)的關(guān)系[A];2007年中國土地學(xué)會(huì)年會(huì)論文集[C];2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 高蓉;房地產(chǎn)估價(jià)中市場(chǎng)比較法的完善研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：2160240