本文選題：居間合同 + 跳單　； 參考：《沈陽師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文中的房屋買賣交易均為二手房買賣，房地產(chǎn)中介服務(wù)在這里僅指向房地產(chǎn)經(jīng)紀(jì)活動(dòng)。近些年來，房地產(chǎn)中介行業(yè)以其投入少、經(jīng)營靈活、方便快捷的特點(diǎn)活躍在市場上，在國家利好政策的扶持下有了一定程度的發(fā)展，成為推動(dòng)經(jīng)濟(jì)迅猛發(fā)展的助推器，在市場經(jīng)濟(jì)活動(dòng)中發(fā)揮著重要作用。房屋買賣有一手房交易也有二手房交易，二手房和一手房相比，二手房交易程序更為復(fù)雜，二手房一般都是個(gè)人之間的交易，不僅有買賣房屋雙方當(dāng)事人，還會(huì)牽涉到房地產(chǎn)中介公司。房地產(chǎn)中介為房屋買賣雙方牽線搭橋，依靠其專業(yè)人員掌握的專業(yè)知識以及特殊的組織機(jī)構(gòu)和活動(dòng)方式，為委托人提供專業(yè)化的居間服務(wù)，滿足交易雙方的需求。但是，目前中介市場混亂無序，欺詐現(xiàn)象、亂收費(fèi)的現(xiàn)象層出不窮，伴隨而來的糾紛不斷發(fā)生，一旦發(fā)生糾紛就相互推卸責(zé)任，往往致使賣房者或購房者的利益遭受損失，而相關(guān)的法律法規(guī)還很滯后，監(jiān)管不到位，無法很好的解決糾紛問題。鑒于此，筆者本著為房屋購買者及出售者服務(wù)的宗旨，同時(shí)兼顧保護(hù)中介的合法利益為出發(fā)點(diǎn)，立足我國現(xiàn)行房地產(chǎn)法律法規(guī)，通過研究二手房居間合同糾紛的典型案例，破解房地產(chǎn)中介的陷阱，才能在交易中避免被動(dòng)，防范風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，化解風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，切實(shí)維護(hù)市場主體的合法權(quán)益。 本文以房地產(chǎn)居間合同糾紛為研究對象，對糾紛產(chǎn)生原因進(jìn)行調(diào)查分析，弄清其特點(diǎn)及其形成過程，從中選取典型案例，展開探討。通過對房地產(chǎn)居間合同糾紛產(chǎn)生原因的分析，歸納出了委托人的“跳單”行為和居間人的“吃差價(jià)”行為、“亂收費(fèi)”行為、違反如實(shí)告知義務(wù)行為是誘發(fā)房地產(chǎn)居間合同糾紛的重要因素，接著對“跳單”行為進(jìn)行認(rèn)定、中介陷阱進(jìn)行識別、“亂收費(fèi)”原因進(jìn)行分析、履行如實(shí)告知義務(wù)的必要性進(jìn)行說明，最后針對擾亂房地產(chǎn)中介市場的不規(guī)范行為提出合理的意見，采取一些措施手段減少由此類行為引發(fā)的糾紛，保護(hù)市場主體的合法權(quán)益，讓房地產(chǎn)中介取信于民，，使房地產(chǎn)中介市場走上健康有序的發(fā)展道路。
[Abstract]:In this paper, housing transactions are second-hand housing transactions, real estate intermediary services here only point to real estate brokerage activities. In recent years, the real estate intermediary industry is active in the market with its characteristics of low investment, flexible management, convenient and fast operation, and has developed to a certain extent with the support of the national favorable policies, and has become a booster to promote the rapid development of the economy. In market economy activity is playing an important role. There are also second-hand housing transactions in housing transactions. Second-hand housing transactions are more complicated than first-hand housing transactions. Second-hand houses are generally transactions between individuals, not only the parties involved in buying and selling houses, Will also involve real estate intermediary companies. Real estate agents connect buyers and sellers, rely on their professional knowledge and special organization and activities to provide professional intermediary services to clients to meet the needs of both parties. However, at present, the intermediary market is chaotic, the phenomenon of fraud, and the phenomenon of random collection of fees emerge in endlessly. The disputes that accompany them occur constantly. Once disputes arise, they shirk their responsibilities, which often results in the loss of the interests of the house sellers or buyers. And the relevant laws and regulations are still lagging behind, supervision is not in place, can not resolve disputes. In view of this, the author, based on the purpose of serving buyers and sellers of houses and taking into account the legitimate interests of intermediaries, based on the current real estate laws and regulations of our country, studies the typical cases of disputes over second-hand housing intermediation contracts. Only by breaking the trap of real estate intermediary can we avoid passivity, guard against risks, dissolve risks and safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of market subjects. This article takes the dispute of the real estate intermediary contract as the research object, investigates and analyzes the causes of the dispute, clarifies its characteristics and its forming process, selects the typical case from it, and probes into it. Through the analysis of the causes of the disputes in the real estate intermediary contract, the author concludes the principal's behavior of "jumping order", the behavior of "eating the difference" and the behavior of "charging arbitrarily". The act of violating the obligation to inform truthfully is the important factor that induces the disputes of the real estate intermediary contract. Then, it identifies the "jump order" behavior, identifies the intermediary trap, and analyzes the causes of "random charge". The necessity of fulfilling the obligation of truthful notification is explained. Finally, reasonable opinions are put forward on the non-standard behavior of disrupting the real estate intermediary market, and some measures are taken to reduce the disputes caused by such acts and to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the market subjects. Let the real estate intermediary trust, so that the real estate intermediary market on a healthy and orderly development road.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D922.29;D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 尚國t2;論房地產(chǎn)經(jīng)紀(jì)業(yè)行業(yè)自律管理的有效手段[J];城市開發(fā);2004年13期

2 周子凡;我國房地產(chǎn)經(jīng)紀(jì)業(yè)務(wù)亟待規(guī)范[J];城市問題;2002年06期

3 張寧;;房屋買賣居間合同中規(guī)避“跳單”條款的效力和“跳單”行為的認(rèn)定[J];法律適用;2010年08期

4 曹伊清;房地產(chǎn)中介糾紛的法律剖析及處理對策(上)[J];中國房地產(chǎn);2004年09期

5 應(yīng)仕海;;房屋居間合同案件審理的若干法律問題研究[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年06期

6 鐘奇江;我國違約金責(zé)任制度探析[J];湖南財(cái)經(jīng)高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

7 陳末;北京規(guī)范房地產(chǎn)經(jīng)紀(jì)中介市場[J];經(jīng)紀(jì)人;2001年05期

8 王恩兆;蘇仲軒;;論房地產(chǎn)居間合同[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2008年08期

9 鄭培春;;簡析中國房地產(chǎn)經(jīng)紀(jì)市場存在的問題[J];今日科苑;2008年15期

10 張春普;梁麗珍;;房屋買賣中的居間合同糾紛[J];經(jīng)營與管理;2009年03期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前4條

1 胡梅娟 實(shí)習(xí)生:劉珊珊;[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)參考報(bào);2006年

2 高萬泉 李鴻光;[N];人民法院報(bào);2005年

3 王俊;[N];人民法院報(bào);2007年

4 胡美玲;[N];中國建設(shè)報(bào);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 郭星;房地產(chǎn)經(jīng)紀(jì)業(yè)法律問題研究[D];華僑大學(xué);2007年

本文編號：2114443