本文選題：城中村改造 + 利益主體　； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：城中村，顧名思義，，是城市中的農(nóng)村，也是一個典型意義上的“問題村”，是在經(jīng)濟快速發(fā)展、城市化進程迅猛推進以及社會轉(zhuǎn)型的過程中由于制度真空及法律法規(guī)不健全等原因而形成的。城中村的出現(xiàn)所帶來的環(huán)境、管理等一系列的社會和經(jīng)濟問題給城市的健康發(fā)展帶來隱患，已嚴(yán)重阻礙了城市化的進程，是全面建設(shè)小康社會中國夢的一大瓶頸。因此，對城中村的改造成為了我國各城市的當(dāng)務(wù)之急，同時也是城市化進程中必須完成的任務(wù)之一。 城中村改造過程中存在著諸多難題，如改造資金、村民的社會保障、城中村土地資產(chǎn)量化等問題，在這些難題當(dāng)中都相應(yīng)地涉及到利益分配問題，而由利益分配所引發(fā)的相關(guān)利益主體的矛盾沖突成為城中村改造中的中心問題，這個問題解決的不好，城中村的改造也就難以順利進行下去。 在城中村改造過程中所涉及的主要利益主體有代表公共利益的政府部門、代表私人部門的房地產(chǎn)開發(fā)商以及代表個體利益的村民，這三類利益主體因利益訴求的不同導(dǎo)致在城中村改造過程、村莊內(nèi)部和外部中相互交鋒和博弈。而由于政府在城中村改造過程中的角色定位不準(zhǔn)確，再者加上村民弱勢群體的不利和相關(guān)法律法規(guī)的缺失導(dǎo)致這場博弈的游戲有愈演愈烈之勢。因此，為了緩和各利益主體的利益沖突，同時兼顧各方利益，必須構(gòu)建城中村利益沖突化解機制。首先，應(yīng)科學(xué)合理的界定三方利益；其次，準(zhǔn)確定位政府在城中村改造中的角色；再次，增強村民的利益博弈能力；最后，加快完善相關(guān)法律法規(guī)和政策。以上對策若形成合力，將可以最大限度的緩和政府、村民以及房地產(chǎn)開發(fā)商之間的矛盾，更有利于城中村改造的順利進行和和諧社會的建設(shè)。
[Abstract]:The village in the city, as its name implies, is the rural area in the city, and it is also a typical "problem village" in the sense of rapid economic development. The process of urbanization is advancing rapidly and the process of social transformation is formed because of institutional vacuum and imperfect laws and regulations. A series of social and economic problems, such as environment, management and so on, bring hidden trouble to the healthy development of the city, which has seriously hindered the process of urbanization and is a major bottleneck in the construction of a well-off society in an all-round way. Therefore, the transformation of villages in cities has become an urgent task for cities in our country, and it is also one of the tasks that must be completed in the process of urbanization. There are many problems in the process of rebuilding villages in cities, such as funds for reconstruction, social security of villagers, quantification of land assets of villages in cities, and so on. But the contradiction and conflict caused by the distribution of interests has become the central problem in the transformation of the village in the city, which is not solved well, and the transformation of the village in the city is difficult to carry on smoothly. The main stakeholders involved in the transformation of villages in cities include government departments representing the public interest, real estate developers representing the private sector and villagers representing individual interests. Because of the different interest demands, these three kinds of interest subjects interact and play each other in the process of village transformation in the city, inside and outside the village. Because the role of the government in the process of the transformation of villages in the city is not accurate, coupled with the disadvantage of the disadvantaged groups of villagers and the lack of relevant laws and regulations, the game of the game has become increasingly fierce. Therefore, in order to alleviate the conflicts of interest of all stakeholders and to give consideration to the interests of all parties, it is necessary to construct a mechanism to resolve the conflicts of interests of the villages in the city. First, we should define the interests of the three parties scientifically and reasonably; secondly, accurately position the role of the government in the transformation of villages in the city; thirdly, enhance the ability of the villagers to play games; finally, speed up the improvement of relevant laws, regulations and policies. If the above countermeasures form a joint force, it will ease the contradictions between the government, villagers and real estate developers to the maximum extent, and is more conducive to the smooth progress of the transformation of villages in the city and the construction of a harmonious society.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D422.6

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 胡瑩;“城中村”的文化沖融——以廣州市石牌村為例[J];城市問題;2002年02期

2 田莉;“都市里的鄉(xiāng)村”現(xiàn)象評析——兼論鄉(xiāng)村——城市轉(zhuǎn)型期的矛盾與協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展[J];城市問題;1998年06期

3 田莉;“都市里的鄉(xiāng)村”現(xiàn)象評析──兼論鄉(xiāng)村─城市轉(zhuǎn)型期的矛盾與協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展[J];城市規(guī)劃匯刊;1998年05期

4 陳濤;楊文選;袁秀娟;;“城中村”改造中主要利益主體及其關(guān)系分析[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)與科技論壇;2008年08期

5 唐忠義;姚科敏;;城中村改造中的博弈關(guān)系與戰(zhàn)略選擇[J];湖北社會科學(xué);2009年03期

6 吳小鋼;;論“城中村”改造中的公共政策[J];管理現(xiàn)代化;2006年01期

本文編號：2097401