本文選題：行政合同 + 行政合同訴訟��； 參考：《電子科技大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：“行政合同是具有行政性質(zhì)的合同，，是指行政主體之間，或者行政主體與個(gè)人、組織之間，以及行政主體與公務(wù)員之間為實(shí)現(xiàn)國家行政管理相關(guān)的一些目標(biāo)，而依法簽訂的協(xié)議�！毙姓贤谴龠M(jìn)行政理性化、民主化的一種新型行政手段，行政合同作為現(xiàn)代行政管理的一種措施，已經(jīng)被廣泛的應(yīng)用于各國實(shí)踐。由于行政合同引入我國的時(shí)間還很短，仍然是一種新興的詞匯，而且相應(yīng)的制度也不完善，缺乏必要的保障機(jī)制，使得行政合同仍舊存在理論上的困惑，立法上的不完整。特別是作為行政合同最好也是最后保障的行政合同救濟(jì)，它的發(fā)展與行政合同的發(fā)展存在不同步性，同時(shí)行政合同救濟(jì)中存在的問題已經(jīng)對(duì)行政合同的大量使用產(chǎn)生了嚴(yán)重的影響。因此，我們要保障當(dāng)事人的合法權(quán)益就必須完善行政合同立法，構(gòu)建行政合同訴訟這一新型訴訟類型，只有這樣才能從根本上實(shí)現(xiàn)對(duì)當(dāng)事人權(quán)益的保障。 本文共分為六章：第一章緒論。首先主要介紹了兩個(gè)典型案例，一個(gè)是泰豐大酒店訴大同市土管局一案，另一個(gè)是武漢市國土資源管理局與武漢興松房地產(chǎn)開發(fā)有限公司行政糾紛上訴案一案，從這兩個(gè)典型案例引出構(gòu)建行政合同訴訟這一訴訟類型。其次，是從研究的現(xiàn)狀和研究的意義兩個(gè)方面內(nèi)容進(jìn)行了闡述。最后，提出本文的研究的思路。第二章行政合同訴訟的基本理論。主要介紹了行政合同訴訟的基本理論，其中包括行政合同概念及特征，以及行政合同訴訟的含義及特征和行政合同訴訟的理論基礎(chǔ)。第三章我國行政合同訴訟司法救濟(jì)的現(xiàn)狀與改革思路分析。主要是對(duì)我國行政合同訴訟司法救濟(jì)的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了分析，提出構(gòu)建我國行政合同訴訟的必要性及可行性。第四章域外行政合同訴訟之考察。主要是對(duì)域外行政合同訴訟制度的研究，通過比較研究提出我國行政合同訴訟所存在的問題。第五章我國行政合同訴訟的建構(gòu)。本章是對(duì)我國行政合同訴訟這一特殊行政訴訟類型構(gòu)建的闡述，主要是從立法思路選擇，以及立法的具體制度設(shè)計(jì)兩個(gè)方面提出了相應(yīng)的改革對(duì)策。第六章結(jié)論。對(duì)文章主要觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行歸納。本文重點(diǎn)是通過分析行政合同訴訟的基本理論，反思我國現(xiàn)有的行政合同救濟(jì)制度存在之問題，進(jìn)而結(jié)合行政合同自身的特殊性，吸收域外先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)對(duì)我國的行政合同訴訟之建構(gòu)進(jìn)行探討。
[Abstract]:"Administrative contracts are contracts of an administrative nature. They refer to administrative subjects, or between administrative subjects and individuals, between organizations, and between administrative subjects and civil servants in order to achieve some objectives related to the administration of the state. And an agreement signed in accordance with the law. " Administrative contract is a new administrative means to promote the rationalization and democratization of administration. As a measure of modern administration, administrative contract has been widely used in various countries. The administrative contract is still a new word because of the short time it has been introduced into our country, and the corresponding system is not perfect and lacks the necessary safeguard mechanism, which makes the administrative contract still exist the confusion in theory and the incomplete in legislation. Especially, as the best and final guarantee of the administrative contract, its development is different from the development of the administrative contract. At the same time, the problems existing in the relief of administrative contracts have had a serious impact on the extensive use of administrative contracts. Therefore, if we want to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties, we must perfect the legislation of the administrative contract and construct the new type of litigation of the administrative contract. Only in this way can we fundamentally realize the protection of the rights and interests of the parties. This paper is divided into six chapters: the first chapter is an introduction. First of all, it mainly introduces two typical cases, one case of Taifeng Hotel v. Datong City Land Management Bureau, the other case of administrative dispute appeal case between Wuhan City Land and Resources Administration Bureau and Wuhan Xingsong Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. From these two typical cases, construct the litigation type of administrative contract litigation. Secondly, from the current situation of the study and the significance of the two aspects of the elaboration. Finally, the paper puts forward the research ideas. The second chapter is the basic theory of administrative contract litigation. This paper mainly introduces the basic theory of administrative contract litigation, including the concept and characteristics of administrative contract, the meaning and characteristics of administrative contract litigation and the theoretical basis of administrative contract litigation. The third chapter analyzes the current situation and reform ideas of judicial relief of administrative contract litigation in China. This paper mainly analyzes the current situation of judicial relief of administrative contract litigation in China, and puts forward the necessity and feasibility of constructing administrative contract litigation in our country. Chapter IV: an investigation of Administrative contract procedure outside the Territory. This paper mainly studies the system of administrative contract litigation in foreign countries, and puts forward the problems of administrative contract litigation in our country through comparative study. The fifth chapter is the construction of administrative contract litigation in our country. This chapter expounds the construction of the special administrative litigation type of administrative contract litigation in our country, and puts forward the corresponding reform countermeasures from two aspects: the choice of legislative thinking and the specific system design of legislation. Chapter VI conclusion. The main points of view of the article are summarized. By analyzing the basic theory of administrative contract litigation, this paper reflects on the existing problems of administrative contract relief system in China, and then combines the particularity of administrative contract itself. This paper discusses the construction of administrative contract litigation in China by absorbing foreign advanced experience.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：電子科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D925.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 畢可志;論對(duì)行政合同糾紛的司法救濟(jì)[J];長白學(xué)刊;2004年04期

2 于立深;;通過實(shí)務(wù)發(fā)現(xiàn)和發(fā)展行政合同制度[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2008年06期

3 劉穎;《行政訴訟法》修訂若干問題的思考[J];法律適用;2004年12期

4 涂師銘;郭海龍;;行政合同爭(zhēng)議的司法救濟(jì)途徑[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下半月);2007年10期

5 張萍;;論行政合同的司法救濟(jì)[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年04期

6 李昭;德法行政合同制度之比較[J];河北法學(xué);2004年03期

7 楊欣;行政合同訴訟比較研究[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

8 陳楠;我國行政訴訟類型化芻議[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期

9 徐翠;行政合同司法審查的理論依據(jù)[J];律師世界;2003年12期

10 李煜興;行政合同制度的比較、反思與重構(gòu)[J];南京社會(huì)科學(xué);2003年07期

本文編號(hào)：2078260