本文選題：房地產(chǎn)業(yè) + 產(chǎn)業(yè)安全　； 參考：《長(zhǎng)沙理工大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：近幾十年來(lái)隨著對(duì)外開(kāi)放的程度逐步加深，對(duì)中國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展具有雙重作用。首先，在對(duì)外開(kāi)放的背景下，給中國(guó)各個(gè)產(chǎn)業(yè)帶來(lái)的更多的資金以及先進(jìn)的管理理念、創(chuàng)新技術(shù)。但同時(shí)，也給中國(guó)各個(gè)產(chǎn)業(yè)帶來(lái)了不斷的沖擊。外資進(jìn)入所引發(fā)的產(chǎn)業(yè)安全的問(wèn)題不容忽視。 本文在產(chǎn)業(yè)安全理論、宏觀(guān)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)、微觀(guān)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)、房地產(chǎn)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)等基本理論的指導(dǎo)下，分析描述中國(guó)房地產(chǎn)的特點(diǎn)、發(fā)展?fàn)顩r以及房地產(chǎn)安全影響因素。借鑒學(xué)者們的研究成果以及相關(guān)的產(chǎn)業(yè)特性，結(jié)合產(chǎn)業(yè)安全指標(biāo)構(gòu)建原則，從而構(gòu)建中國(guó)房地產(chǎn)的產(chǎn)業(yè)安全評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系，采用主成分分析方法分析選取的指標(biāo)得出產(chǎn)業(yè)安全度，并與無(wú)外資進(jìn)入的指標(biāo)條件下對(duì)比分析中國(guó)房地產(chǎn)的產(chǎn)業(yè)安全度。 本文的研究結(jié)果得出以下的結(jié)論：第一，房地產(chǎn)投資風(fēng)險(xiǎn)加大，外資對(duì)房地產(chǎn)產(chǎn)業(yè)安全影響較大。實(shí)證分析得到外資利用率對(duì)中國(guó)房地產(chǎn)產(chǎn)業(yè)度影響突出。第二，房地產(chǎn)發(fā)展環(huán)境對(duì)房地產(chǎn)產(chǎn)業(yè)安全的影響大。產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展環(huán)境的因素在第一主成分全部顯示，說(shuō)明對(duì)產(chǎn)業(yè)安全影響較大。資本成本增加，市場(chǎng)需求不能滿(mǎn)足，勞動(dòng)力素質(zhì)逐漸下降，因此房地產(chǎn)發(fā)展環(huán)境面對(duì)越來(lái)越多的挑戰(zhàn)。第三，房地產(chǎn)產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力不強(qiáng)。2011年年底，中國(guó)房地產(chǎn)開(kāi)發(fā)企業(yè)資產(chǎn)總額達(dá)284359億元,資產(chǎn)負(fù)債率高達(dá)75.4%。在競(jìng)爭(zhēng)日益激烈的房地產(chǎn)市場(chǎng)，，房地產(chǎn)開(kāi)發(fā)企業(yè)規(guī)�；�(jīng)營(yíng)程度低，產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)不均衡，導(dǎo)致房地產(chǎn)業(yè)總體產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力不強(qiáng)。第四，房地產(chǎn)對(duì)社會(huì)貢獻(xiàn)作用大。經(jīng)研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，就業(yè)人數(shù)2001年~2011年由106萬(wàn)人增長(zhǎng)至225萬(wàn)人；經(jīng)營(yíng)企業(yè)數(shù)目2001年~2011年由29552家增加到88419家，我國(guó)房地產(chǎn)業(yè)在增加社會(huì)財(cái)富、促進(jìn)就業(yè)方面發(fā)揮了積極的作用。 最后，本文針對(duì)研究的結(jié)果提出相關(guān)的對(duì)策建議。首先完善產(chǎn)業(yè)安全保護(hù)的相關(guān)政策，完善反壟斷法，加強(qiáng)外資法的實(shí)施，扶持國(guó)家競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力弱的產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展。其次，抑制房地產(chǎn)投資過(guò)熱的現(xiàn)象，對(duì)外資的進(jìn)入酌情加以控制。增強(qiáng)房地產(chǎn)產(chǎn)業(yè)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力。再次，積極推動(dòng)房地產(chǎn)發(fā)展對(duì)社會(huì)的貢獻(xiàn)作用，提高社會(huì)就業(yè)程度。
[Abstract]:With the deepening of opening to the outside world in recent decades, it plays a dual role in the development of China's industrial economy. First of all, under the background of opening to the outside world, more funds and advanced management ideas and innovative technology will be brought to all industries in China. But at the same time, it has also brought constant impact to various industries in China. The problem of industrial safety caused by foreign capital entering should not be ignored. Under the guidance of industrial safety theory, macroeconomics, microeconomics, real estate economics and other basic theories, this paper analyzes and describes the characteristics of Chinese real estate, its development and the influencing factors of real estate security. Referring to the research results of scholars and related industry characteristics, combining with the principles of industrial safety index construction, this paper constructs the industrial safety evaluation index system of China's real estate. The industrial safety degree of China's real estate is analyzed by principal component analysis (PCA) method and compared with the index without foreign capital. The conclusions are as follows: first, the risk of real estate investment is increased, and foreign investment has a great impact on the safety of real estate industry. Empirical analysis shows that the utilization rate of foreign capital has a prominent impact on China's real estate industry. Second, the real estate development environment has a great impact on the real estate industry safety. The factors of industrial development environment are all shown in the first principal component, indicating that the impact on industrial safety is great. The capital cost increases, the market demand cannot satisfy, the labor quality drops gradually, therefore the real estate development environment faces more and more challenges. Third, the competitiveness of the real estate industry is not strong. At the end of 2011, the total assets of Chinese real estate development enterprises reached 28.4359 trillion yuan, and the ratio of assets to liabilities reached 75.445%. In the increasingly competitive real estate market, the scale of real estate development enterprises is low, the industrial structure is not balanced, leading to the overall industrial competitiveness of the real estate industry is not strong. Fourth, real estate has a great contribution to society. It is found that the number of employed persons increased from 1.06 million to 2.25 million from 2001 to 2011, and the number of enterprises increased from 29552 to 88419 from 2001 to 2011. The real estate industry in China has played an active role in increasing social wealth and promoting employment. Finally, this paper puts forward the relevant countermeasures and suggestions in view of the results of the study. Firstly, we should perfect the relevant policies of industrial safety protection, perfect the anti-monopoly law, strengthen the implementation of foreign capital law, and support the development of industries with weak national competitiveness. Secondly, restrain the phenomenon of overheating of real estate investment, and control the entry of foreign capital as appropriate. Enhance the competitiveness of the real estate industry. Thirdly, promote the contribution of real estate development to the society and improve the degree of social employment.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：長(zhǎng)沙理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F299.23

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 金成曉;余志剛;俞婷婷;;我國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)安全研究的歷史與發(fā)展動(dòng)態(tài)評(píng)述[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問(wèn)題研究;2010年07期

2 李泳;王愛(ài)玲;;中國(guó)重點(diǎn)行業(yè)安全評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系研究[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2006年10期

3 徐力行;高偉凱;陳俞紅;;國(guó)外產(chǎn)業(yè)安全防范體系的比較及啟示[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年12期

4 劉建江;陳海燕;賀平;楊俊峰;;利用外資中的產(chǎn)業(yè)安全維護(hù):美、日、韓、墨四國(guó)經(jīng)驗(yàn)[J];長(zhǎng)沙理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年04期

5 李紅;;產(chǎn)業(yè)安全評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系的構(gòu)建[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年19期

6 何維達(dá),何昌;當(dāng)前中國(guó)三大產(chǎn)業(yè)安全的初步估算[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2002年02期

7 王燕梅;我國(guó)制造業(yè)的對(duì)外開(kāi)放與國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)安全[J];中國(guó)工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2004年12期

8 韓常青;蔡堅(jiān);;加入GPA對(duì)我國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)安全影響的實(shí)證分析[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問(wèn)題;2010年12期

9 劉勇;朱瑜;;論反傾銷(xiāo)與反補(bǔ)貼對(duì)我國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)產(chǎn)業(yè)安全的保障作用[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問(wèn)題;2011年02期

10 張新民;黃曉蓓;鄭建明;;外資并購(gòu)與我國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)安全:綜述及研究展望[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易問(wèn)題;2012年04期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 呂博 商務(wù)部研究院世界經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易研究部研究員;[N];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)導(dǎo)報(bào);2008年

本文編號(hào)：2016658