本文選題：小產(chǎn)權(quán)房 + 新興古典經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)��； 參考：《西南交通大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：2014年3月,國(guó)土資源部和住建部聯(lián)合發(fā)出通知,要求全面叫停小產(chǎn)權(quán)房,總建筑面積已超7.6億平方米的小產(chǎn)權(quán)房也再度成為人們關(guān)注的熱點(diǎn)。然而,建立在農(nóng)村集體土地上的小產(chǎn)權(quán)房并不符合我國(guó)現(xiàn)行法律的規(guī)定,小產(chǎn)權(quán)房問(wèn)題也應(yīng)牽扯多方利益而愈加復(fù)雜。 小產(chǎn)權(quán)房普遍存在并不斷發(fā)展的現(xiàn)實(shí)情況下,我們審視的視角就不應(yīng)只停留在現(xiàn)有法律條文的字面意義上了。小產(chǎn)權(quán)房與一般商品房由于土地制度產(chǎn)生價(jià)格差異來(lái)滿足人們的不同需求,而人們更傾向于購(gòu)買(mǎi)價(jià)格低的小產(chǎn)權(quán)房,所謂“大”與“小”產(chǎn)權(quán)正是差在土地的產(chǎn)權(quán)問(wèn)題當(dāng)中。因此,我們?cè)噲D透過(guò)商品房與小產(chǎn)權(quán)房在市場(chǎng)中所表現(xiàn)出的不同價(jià)格的現(xiàn)象,研究小產(chǎn)權(quán)房建房行為在資源配置過(guò)程中的效率問(wèn)題。 小產(chǎn)權(quán)房建設(shè)過(guò)程中使用的資源分為兩類(lèi)：土地資源與非土地資源,因而研究小產(chǎn)權(quán)房對(duì)資源的配置效率分為對(duì)土地資源的效率研究和對(duì)非土地資源的效率研究。假定商品房與小產(chǎn)權(quán)房對(duì)非土地資源的利用效率是相同的,因此本文的研究范圍界定為小產(chǎn)權(quán)房對(duì)土地資源配置的效率研究。我們將從另一個(gè)視角——新興古典經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的分工理論,運(yùn)用超邊際分析方法比較小產(chǎn)權(quán)房與一般商品房對(duì)土地資源的配置效率,首先通過(guò)建立三個(gè)決策者的超邊際模型證明完全分工的生產(chǎn)效率高于非完全分工的生產(chǎn)效率；其次,從各自開(kāi)發(fā)過(guò)程中對(duì)土地的利用方式,證明小產(chǎn)權(quán)房與商品房對(duì)土地的使用方式分別屬于完全分工結(jié)構(gòu)和非完全分工結(jié)構(gòu)；最后,在上述兩點(diǎn)的基礎(chǔ)上得出結(jié)論：小產(chǎn)權(quán)房對(duì)土地的使用效率高于—般商品房對(duì)土地的使用效率。 接著,本文通過(guò)對(duì)成都市小產(chǎn)權(quán)房現(xiàn)狀的實(shí)際調(diào)研,發(fā)現(xiàn)成都市小產(chǎn)權(quán)房?jī)r(jià)格是同地段商品房?jī)r(jià)格的30%—50%。更進(jìn)一步地,建立Hedonic實(shí)證模型,通過(guò)去除其他影響房地產(chǎn)價(jià)格的因素,發(fā)現(xiàn)小產(chǎn)權(quán)屬性對(duì)住宅價(jià)格影響明顯,且成反向變化。這表明,在市場(chǎng)機(jī)制下,價(jià)格負(fù)反饋機(jī)制必然會(huì)自發(fā)調(diào)節(jié)資源配置,最終達(dá)到價(jià)格的一致和市場(chǎng)的均衡。這也再次證明,非完全分工結(jié)構(gòu)會(huì)向完全分工的結(jié)構(gòu)演進(jìn),從而達(dá)到一般均衡,提高整個(gè)經(jīng)濟(jì)的效率。因此,建立起城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)一的建設(shè)用地市場(chǎng)和合理的農(nóng)村土地流轉(zhuǎn)體系,讓市場(chǎng)決定資源的配置顯得尤為重要。
[Abstract]:In March 2014, the Ministry of land and resources and the Ministry of housing and construction jointly issued a notification that small property houses were called to stop in an all-round way. The small property houses with a total building area of over 760 million square meters have become the focus of attention again. However, the small property houses built on the rural collective land are not in accordance with the provisions of the current laws of China, and the problem of small property rights houses should also be involved. Many interests and more complex.
Under the reality of the existence and continuous development of the small property right house, we should not only look at the literal meaning of the existing legal provisions. The price difference between the small property right house and the general commodity house to meet the different needs of the people because of the land system, and people are more inclined to buy small property houses with low price, so called "the house of small property right". Therefore, we try to study the efficiency of house building behavior in the process of resource allocation through the phenomenon of different prices in the market of commodity houses and small property houses.
The resources used in the construction process of small property right house are divided into two types: land resources and non land resources. Therefore, the research on the allocation efficiency of small property right house is divided into the efficiency of land resources and the efficiency of non land resources. The scope of the study is defined as the efficiency of the allocation of land resources by the small property right house. We will use the theory of the division of labor of new classical economics from another perspective and compare the efficiency of the allocation of land resources by the small property right house and the general commodity house by using the method of the hyper marginal analysis. First, it is proved through the establishment of the super marginal model of three decision-makers. The production efficiency of the whole division of labor is higher than that of the non complete division of labor. Secondly, from the use of land in the development process, it is proved that the use mode of the small property right house and the commercial housing to the land belongs to the complete division structure and the incomplete division of labor structure respectively. Finally, the conclusion is drawn on the basis of the above two points: the small property house to the soil The efficiency of land use is higher than that of commercial housing.
Then, through the actual investigation of the current situation of small property house in Chengdu, it is found that the price of small property right house in Chengdu is 30% to 50%. in the same lot, and the Hedonic empirical model is established. By removing other factors that affect the price of real estate, it is found that the property of small property right has an obvious influence on the housing price, and it has a reverse change. This shows that under the market mechanism, the price negative feedback mechanism will spontaneously regulate the allocation of resources and ultimately achieve the agreement of price and the equilibrium of the market. It is also proved that the structure of the non complete division of labor will evolve to the structure of the complete division of labor, thus achieving the general equilibrium and improving the efficiency of the whole economy. Therefore, the construction of the unified urban and rural areas will be established. Land market and reasonable rural land transfer system make the market decide the allocation of resources is particularly important.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F299.23

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 秦鳳偉;;交易費(fèi)用視角下的“小產(chǎn)權(quán)房”解析[J];濱州學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年04期

2 羅文剴;;城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌背景下破題“小產(chǎn)權(quán)”房問(wèn)題[J];成都大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(教育科學(xué)版);2008年08期

3 文林峰;楊玉珍;;“小產(chǎn)權(quán)”房不能解決城鎮(zhèn)居民住房問(wèn)題[J];城鄉(xiāng)建設(shè);2007年08期

4 徐曄;張秋燕;;中國(guó)高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)各行業(yè)資源配置效率的實(shí)證研究——基于DEA-Malmquist指數(shù)方法[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2009年12期

5 李長(zhǎng)健;屈怡;曹俊;;基于農(nóng)民權(quán)益保護(hù)視野下的“小產(chǎn)權(quán)”房的法律問(wèn)題研究[J];桂海論叢;2008年04期

6 李中;;農(nóng)地入市流轉(zhuǎn)對(duì)土地資源配置效率的影響[J];財(cái)經(jīng)問(wèn)題研究;2012年12期

7 彭美玉;;成都市土地整理及農(nóng)村房屋轉(zhuǎn)讓的理論探討——新興古典經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的一個(gè)案例[J];中國(guó)房地產(chǎn);2011年12期

8 王海鴻;付士波;朱前濤;;“小產(chǎn)權(quán)房”存在的合理性及其合法化途徑研究——基于土地發(fā)展權(quán)角度[J];華東經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2009年12期

9 林姜;;經(jīng)濟(jì)法視野下的小產(chǎn)權(quán)房問(wèn)題[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)導(dǎo)刊;2010年09期

10 許海燕;梅昀;張漢江;;利益博弈視角下小產(chǎn)權(quán)房的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)思考[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革;2008年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：1944339