本文選題：房地產(chǎn)公司破產(chǎn) + 優(yōu)先權(quán)��； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：房地產(chǎn)公司的破產(chǎn)過程不僅會涉及破產(chǎn)程序中的優(yōu)先權(quán)問題，包括職工債權(quán)、擔(dān)保債權(quán)、社會保險費(fèi)用和稅收債權(quán)、侵權(quán)請求權(quán)等；而且還會涉及承包人的建設(shè)工程價款優(yōu)先受償權(quán)及購房消費(fèi)者的權(quán)益保護(hù)等問題。實(shí)踐中在處理各項權(quán)利之間的順位關(guān)系時爭議較多，文章主要分析破產(chǎn)程序中各項權(quán)利的定性和順位關(guān)系，以期理出明確的順位關(guān)系。 第一章具體分析建設(shè)工程價款優(yōu)先受償權(quán)，包括建設(shè)工程價款優(yōu)先受償權(quán)的性質(zhì)分析，，定性為法定優(yōu)先權(quán)的理論基礎(chǔ)，其效力、與擔(dān)保權(quán)利的關(guān)系等內(nèi)容。 第二章具體分析消費(fèi)者的購房債權(quán)，包括對“大部分款項”范圍的界定，對“不得對抗”含義的探究，以及在不同情況下消費(fèi)者受保護(hù)權(quán)利范圍的確定，并明確消費(fèi)者的購房債權(quán)可對抗建設(shè)工程價款優(yōu)先受償權(quán)、抵押權(quán)等權(quán)利。 第三章具體分析職工債權(quán)，內(nèi)容包括職工債權(quán)優(yōu)先權(quán)的理論基礎(chǔ)，與建設(shè)工程價款優(yōu)先受償權(quán)、擔(dān)保權(quán)利的關(guān)系等。 第四章具體分析稅收債權(quán)，包括稅收債權(quán)的理論基礎(chǔ)、立法沖突、優(yōu)先權(quán)定位，其與建設(shè)工程價款優(yōu)先受償權(quán)、擔(dān)保權(quán)的關(guān)系等內(nèi)容。 第五章具體分析社會保險費(fèi)用的優(yōu)先權(quán)定位，包含在職工債權(quán)中增加失業(yè)保險，以及社會保險費(fèi)用同稅收債權(quán)一樣降位為普通債權(quán)等內(nèi)容。 第六章具體介紹侵權(quán)請求權(quán)的優(yōu)先權(quán)保障，包括產(chǎn)生原因、性質(zhì)之爭、優(yōu)先依據(jù)，與稅收債權(quán)、社會保險費(fèi)用、職工債權(quán)、擔(dān)保權(quán)利的順位關(guān)系，以及民事責(zé)任優(yōu)先等內(nèi)容。 最后一部分是結(jié)語，明確了各項權(quán)利之間的順位關(guān)系，除卻破產(chǎn)費(fèi)用和共益費(fèi)用以破產(chǎn)財產(chǎn)隨時支付外，建設(shè)工程價款優(yōu)先受償權(quán)、職工債權(quán)、侵權(quán)請求權(quán)等民事債權(quán)中的人身損害賠償請求權(quán)應(yīng)屬于第一順位，擔(dān)保權(quán)利應(yīng)屬于第二順位，其他財產(chǎn)性的民事責(zé)任處于第三順位，稅收債權(quán)、其他社會保險費(fèi)用等行政責(zé)任以及刑事責(zé)任應(yīng)屬于第四順位。上述第一順位中再明確區(qū)分的話，建設(shè)工程價款優(yōu)先受償權(quán)應(yīng)優(yōu)先于職工債權(quán)和侵權(quán)請求權(quán)。
[Abstract]:The bankruptcy process of a real estate company not only involves the priority issues in the bankruptcy procedure, including the employee's creditor's rights, the guarantee claim, the social insurance expense and the tax claim, the tort claim and so on; It will also involve the contractor's construction project price priority and the protection of the rights and interests of home buyers and so on. In practice, there are many controversies in dealing with the ranking relationship between rights. This paper mainly analyzes the qualitative and sequential relationship of each right in bankruptcy proceedings, in order to find out a clear sequence relationship. The first chapter concretely analyzes the construction project price priority right of payment, including the nature analysis of the construction project price priority right, which is the theoretical basis of the legal priority, its effectiveness, and the relationship between the construction project price priority and the security right, and so on. The second chapter concretely analyzes the consumer's right to purchase a house, including the definition of the scope of "most of the money", the exploration of the meaning of "no confrontation", and the determination of the scope of the consumer's right to protection under different circumstances. It is clear that the consumer's right to purchase a house can counteract the right of priority payment, mortgage and other rights of the construction project. The third chapter analyzes the workers' claims, including the theoretical basis of the priority of the workers' claims, the relationship between the priority of the construction project price and the security rights, and so on. The fourth chapter analyzes the tax claims, including the theoretical basis of tax claims, legislative conflicts, priority positioning, its relationship with the construction project price priority, security rights and so on. The fifth chapter analyzes the priority orientation of social insurance costs, including the increase of unemployment insurance in the claims of employees, and the social insurance expenses are reduced to ordinary claims as tax claims, and so on. The sixth chapter introduces the priority protection of tort claims, including the causes, nature of disputes, priority basis, and tax claims, social insurance fees, employee claims, security rights, and civil liability priority. The last part is the conclusion, which clarifies the relationship between the various rights. Except for the bankruptcy expenses and the common benefits expenses paid at any time by the bankruptcy estate, the construction project price is given priority to the right to be repaid, and the employee's creditor's rights. The right to claim for personal injury should belong to the first order, the security right should belong to the second rank, the other property civil liability should be in the third order, and the tax claim, the right to claim for personal injury and other civil claims for tort should be in the first order, and the right of security should be in the second order. Other social insurance charges and other administrative responsibilities and criminal liability should belong to the fourth rank. In the first order above, the construction project price should be given priority over the employee's creditor's right and tort claim.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.22;D923;D922.291.92;D922.28

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 夏鳳英;論建設(shè)工程承包人優(yōu)先受償權(quán)的性質(zhì)[J];河北法學(xué);2001年03期

2 韓長印;;我國別除權(quán)制度改革初論[J];南京大學(xué)法律評論;2004年01期

3 黃有麗;論建設(shè)工程承包人的優(yōu)先受償權(quán)[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年04期

4 葉伶俐;;建設(shè)工程價款優(yōu)先受償權(quán)的司法困境及其應(yīng)對[J];山東審判;2012年06期

5 上海市黃浦人民法院課題組;;民事強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行程序中涉稅沖突問題研究[J];人民司法;2013年05期

本文編號：1908910