本文選題：地產(chǎn)開發(fā)商 + 業(yè)委會��； 參考：《中國土地》2017年01期

【摘要】：正問題某小區(qū)業(yè)主甲與房地產(chǎn)開發(fā)商乙簽訂了《車位使用協(xié)議》,約定小區(qū)內(nèi)第5號地上停車位由甲長期獨(dú)占使用,甲向乙支付了2萬元車位使用費(fèi)。該車位系經(jīng)規(guī)劃審批建設(shè)的停車位,鋪裝了植草磚,占地面積按50%計入綠化面積。后業(yè)委會主張該停車位為全體業(yè)主共有。請問:甲乙簽訂的這份車位使用協(xié)議是否有效?解答一、本案中第5號停車位的權(quán)屬性質(zhì)
[Abstract]:The owner of a residential area and real estate developer B signed a "parking space use agreement", agreed that the residential area No. 5 above ground parking space by a long-term exclusive use, A paid 20,000 yuan to B parking fees. The parking space is a parking space which is approved and constructed by planning and approval. It is paved with grass planting bricks and covers 50% of the total area included in the greening area. The Council of Industry advocates that the parking space be owned by all owners. May I ask: is this parking agreement signed by A and B valid? Answer 1. The ownership of parking space no. 5 in this case
【作者單位】： 北京大學(xué);
【分類號】：D920.5;D923.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 謝芳;;美國社區(qū)里的“和事老”權(quán)力大[J];社區(qū);2011年23期

2 張大偉;總部基地很美[J];w攣胖蕓，

本文編號：1849352