本文選題：金融調控權 + 構造　； 參考：《吉林大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：中國人民銀行是我國的中央銀行，是我國享有金融調控權的主體，它在國務院領導下行使金融調控權。隨著我國市場經濟的不斷發(fā)展，尤其是近幾年金融調控權在應對金融危機、房地產泡沫以及通貨膨脹等問題中發(fā)揮了重要的作用。金融調控權的過分集中，勢必會造成權力的濫用，同時會滋生腐敗，也將產生一系列嚴重的社會問題。因此，把金融調控權納入到法律規(guī)制的框架是必要的。 如果把權力看成一種自由，那么自由到了一定邊界，就要對秩序做出衡量，自由和秩序平衡的結果就意味著有了實現(xiàn)正義的可能性，所以，金融調控權應該受到限制。為此《中國人民銀行法》賦予中國人民銀行以金融調控權，即貨幣政策制定和執(zhí)行權，中國人民銀行選擇運用各種貨幣政策工具調節(jié)和控制貨幣供應量，，以維護金融穩(wěn)定，保持經濟健康持續(xù)發(fā)展。然而在《中國人民銀行法》中卻很少發(fā)現(xiàn)對金融調控權主體濫用權力所應承擔不利后果的相關規(guī)定。金融調控權作為一種公權力本身就具有強大的社會力量，在立法上理應有所傾斜，這種偏向保障權力而較少規(guī)定權力行使所應承擔的不利的法律后果也有違現(xiàn)代法治通過限制國家權力從而保障公民權利的精神。 本文將從四個部分闡述金融調控權的構造及其邊界： 第一部分從金融調控權的一般理論出發(fā)，闡述金融調控權的構造，主要從金融調控權的主體、內容、特征的角度靜態(tài)分析金融調控權。 第二部分是從根源上分析金融調控權產生，說明金融調控權不是從來就有的，也不是伴隨著貨幣的產生而產生，而是商品經濟發(fā)展到一定階段的產物。第二次世界大戰(zhàn)結束后，東歐劇變，蘇聯(lián)解體，新科技革命等，世界朝著多極化發(fā)展，逐漸形成一個統(tǒng)一的市場，金融調控權理論的發(fā)展也應隨經濟基礎的變化而做出與之相適應的調整。 第三部分從動態(tài)的角度分析金融調控權的運行，金融調控權的運行是一個從貨幣政策目標制定、貨幣政策制定與執(zhí)行的過程。要建立和維護金融調控權的政策運行，必須運用法律對金融調控權從程序加以限制，將金融調控權控制在法律允許的范圍內。 第四部分為金融調控權的約束機制，建立起統(tǒng)一完備金融調控權約束機制能有效防止金融調控權的濫用、防止腐敗的發(fā)生。金融調控權的約束主要有以法律制約金融調控權、以道德制約金融調控權、以權力制約金融調控權和以權利制約金融調控權四個約束機制，這四種約束機制能夠更好地起到探求金融調控權的構造和邊界的作用，它們之間不是相互孤立，而是一個相互補充的整體。
[Abstract]:The people's Bank of China is the central bank of our country and the main body of financial control power in our country. It exercises the financial control power under the leadership of the State Council. With the development of market economy in our country, especially in recent years, financial control power has played an important role in dealing with financial crisis, real estate bubble and inflation. The excessive concentration of financial control power will inevitably lead to abuse of power, corruption and a series of serious social problems. Therefore, it is necessary to bring financial control right into the framework of legal regulation. If we regard power as a kind of freedom, then when we reach a certain boundary, we must measure the order. The result of the balance of freedom and order means that there is the possibility to realize justice, so the financial control power should be restricted. For this reason, the people's Bank of China has given the people's Bank of China the right to control financial affairs, that is, the power to formulate and execute monetary policy. The people's Bank of China has chosen to use various monetary policy instruments to regulate and control the money supply in order to maintain financial stability. Maintain healthy and sustained economic development. However, in the Law of the people's Bank of China, there are few provisions about the negative consequences to the abusing power of the subject of financial regulation and control. As a kind of public power, the right of financial control has a strong social force, and it should be inclined in legislation. This tendency to protect power and less to stipulate the adverse legal consequences which should be borne by the exercise of power also runs counter to the spirit of modern rule of law by restricting the power of the state so as to protect the rights of citizens. This paper will elaborate the construction and boundary of financial control power from four parts: In the first part, from the general theory of financial control power, the paper expounds the structure of financial control power, mainly from the main body, content and characteristics of the financial control power static analysis of the financial control power. The second part is to analyze the origin of financial control power, which shows that financial control power does not always exist, nor does it come into being with the production of money, but the product of commodity economy development to a certain stage. After the end of the second World War, with the dramatic changes in Eastern Europe, the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the new technological revolution, and so on, the world developed towards multipolarization and gradually formed a unified market. The development of the theory of financial control power should be adjusted with the change of economic base. The third part analyzes the operation of the financial control power from the dynamic point of view. The operation of the financial control power is a process from the monetary policy target formulation, the monetary policy formulation and the implementation. In order to establish and maintain the policy operation of the financial control power, we must use the law to restrict the financial control power from the procedure, and control the financial control power within the scope permitted by the law. The fourth part is the restriction mechanism of the financial control power, which can effectively prevent the abuse of the financial control power and the occurrence of corruption. The restraint of financial control power mainly includes four restraint mechanisms: restricting financial control power by law, restricting financial control right by morality, restricting financial control right by power and restricting financial control right by right. These four constraint mechanisms can play a better role in exploring the construction and boundary of financial control power. They are not isolated from each other but a complementary whole.
【學位授予單位】：吉林大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.281

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 張守文;宏觀調控權的法律解析[J];北京大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2001年03期

2 劉志云,鄭普英;芻議金融調控法體系[J];法學雜志;2002年06期

3 陳承堂;;論宏觀調控權的性質[J];時代法學;2008年03期

4 李西臣;;金融宏觀調控行為的經濟法分析[J];經濟經緯;2007年06期

5 胡光志;周昌發(fā);;金融調控權若干問題探討[J];經濟體制改革;2009年02期

6 何志鵬;;國際法治:和諧世界的必由之路[J];清華法學;2009年01期

7 閆德民;;權力制約范式論析[J];社會科學;2009年07期

8 陳承堂;;宏觀調控權是怎樣生成的 基于羅斯福新政的考察[J];中外法學;2011年05期

9 李昌麒,胡光志;宏觀調控法若干基本范疇的法理分析[J];中國法學;2002年02期

10 張輝;;論宏觀經濟調控權的構成與配置[J];政治與法律;2008年11期

本文編號：1798986