本文選題：物業(yè)管理法律制度 + 建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)　； 參考：《中國政法大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】：物權(quán)法確立了我國建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)在物業(yè)管理法律制度中的基礎(chǔ)地位,但因物權(quán)法的相關(guān)法律規(guī)定存在瑕疵,以及與其配套的物業(yè)管理條例等法規(guī)、規(guī)章的制度設(shè)計也存在一定的漏洞,這使得物權(quán)法在實施后產(chǎn)生了很多新的法律問題。本文主要在對物業(yè)管理法律制度基本理論研究的基礎(chǔ)上,聯(lián)系我國物業(yè)管理法律制度的現(xiàn)狀,對我國物業(yè)管理法律制度存在的若干爭議較大的問題:業(yè)主大會及業(yè)主委員會法律地位,地下車位所有權(quán),前期物業(yè)管理法律制度這三個問題進行了比較深入的研究。提出問題后,通過對國外處理此類問題的法律實踐與我國現(xiàn)有物業(yè)管理法律制度的現(xiàn)狀進行對比,找出問題產(chǎn)生的根源,并提出自己的立法建議。 文章的正文由三部分組成,分別為:物業(yè)管理法律制度的基本理論,我國物業(yè)管理法律制度的基本框架,我國當(dāng)前物業(yè)管理法律制度中存在的幾個問題及對策。 通過對物業(yè)管理法律制度的基本概念的研究,論證了建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)理論是物業(yè)管理法律制度理論基礎(chǔ)的根源。通過對國外的物業(yè)管理法律制度的發(fā)展模式的介紹及優(yōu)缺點分析,論證了我國建立在建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)理論基礎(chǔ)上的物業(yè)管理法律制度模式的優(yōu)點、不足及未來的立法方向。 以建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)為物業(yè)管理法律制度的理論基礎(chǔ),又重點研究了我國物業(yè)管理法律制度的框架,包括:物業(yè)管理在物權(quán)上的地位及特有的公私兼顧的法律屬性,我國物業(yè)管理法律制度體現(xiàn)的三個基本原則和主要存在的五種法律關(guān)系。 在上述物業(yè)管理法律理論的指導(dǎo)下,結(jié)合我國物業(yè)現(xiàn)狀,本文重點對三個問題做了專題研究。一是業(yè)主大會及業(yè)主委員會的法律地位問題,提出了應(yīng)該由全體業(yè)主自主決定是否將業(yè)主大會或業(yè)主委員會設(shè)立為有民事主體資格的“其他組織”,并設(shè)計了配套的法律制度。二是物權(quán)法通過后所形成的小區(qū)停車位的問題,提出了原則上地下車位(包括在人防工程設(shè)立的停車位)為全體業(yè)主所有,特定條件下,可以通過契約自由的原則約定地下車位歸屬的立法建議。三是引起物業(yè)糾紛最多的前期物業(yè)管理制度問題,列舉了現(xiàn)有制度存在的幾個問題,并針對上述問題提出了相應(yīng)的立法建議,即通過完善法律制度限制建設(shè)單位在前期物業(yè)管理中濫用權(quán)利,保護業(yè)主的權(quán)利,從而減少因前期物業(yè)管理法律制度的不足而產(chǎn)生的法律糾紛。 文章在最后也指出物業(yè)管理所涉及的法律問題遠遠不止上述這些,并相信隨著我國物業(yè)法律制度的研究系統(tǒng)化、專業(yè)化,立法的專業(yè)化,我國必將建立起完善的物業(yè)管理法律制度。
[Abstract]:The property law has established the basic position of building differentiated ownership in the legal system of property management in our country. However, due to the defects in the relevant laws and regulations of the property law, and the corresponding regulations of property management, and so on,There are also some loopholes in the system design of regulations, which makes the real right law produce a lot of new legal problems after it is put into practice.Based on the study of the basic theory of the legal system of property management, this paper relates to the present situation of the legal system of property management in our country.This paper makes a deep research on some controversial issues in the legal system of property management in China: the legal status of the owners' Congress and the owners' committee, the ownership of underground parking spaces and the legal system of property management in the early stage.After putting forward the problem, the author compares the legal practice of dealing with this kind of problem with the present situation of our country's property management legal system, finds out the root of the problem, and puts forward his own legislative suggestion.The text of this paper consists of three parts: the basic theory of the legal system of property management, the basic framework of the legal system of property management in our country, several problems and countermeasures in the current legal system of property management in our country.Based on the study of the basic concept of the legal system of property management, this paper demonstrates that the theory of building differentiated ownership is the root of the theoretical foundation of the legal system of property management.Based on the introduction of the development mode of foreign property management legal system and the analysis of its advantages and disadvantages, this paper demonstrates the advantages, disadvantages and future legislative direction of the property management legal system model based on the theory of building differentiated ownership in our country.Taking building ownership as the theoretical basis of the legal system of property management, this paper focuses on the framework of the legal system of property management in our country, including: the position of property management in real right and its unique legal attributes of taking both public and private into account.There are three basic principles and five main legal relationships in the legal system of property management in China.Under the guidance of the above-mentioned legal theory of property management and the current situation of property in China, this paper focuses on three issues.The first is the legal status of the owners' Congress and the owners' committee, which puts forward that the owners' meeting or the owners' committee should be set up as "other organizations" with the qualification of civil subject, and a supporting legal system is designed.Second, the problem of parking spaces in residential areas formed after the passage of the property Law. It is proposed that, in principle, underground parking spaces (including parking spaces set up in civil air defense projects) are owned by all owners, and under certain conditions,A legislative proposal for the attribution of underground parking spaces may be agreed upon through the principle of freedom of contract.The third is the property management system which causes the most property disputes, enumerates several problems existing in the existing system, and puts forward the corresponding legislative suggestions in view of the above problems.That is, by perfecting the legal system to limit the abuse of rights of construction units in the early stage of property management, to protect the rights of the owners, thus reducing the legal disputes arising from the lack of the legal system of property management in the early stage.At the end of the article, the author also points out that the legal problems involved in property management are far more than those mentioned above, and believes that with the systematization, specialization and legislation specialization of the property legal system in our country,China will set up a perfect legal system of property management.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D922.181;D923.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 葉天泉;關(guān)于物業(yè)管理立法的思考[J];中國房地產(chǎn);1997年05期

，

本文編號：1732291