本文選題：承租人　切入點：優(yōu)先購買權(quán)　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：房屋承租人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)是優(yōu)先購買權(quán)中的一種，是指在房屋租賃關(guān)系存續(xù)期間，承租人按照法律規(guī)定所享有的，當(dāng)出租人出賣租賃房屋給第三人時，得以同等條件優(yōu)先購買該租賃房屋的權(quán)利。該制度作為一項重要的民事法律制度，是在平衡民事主體意思自治的基礎(chǔ)上保護(hù)弱勢群體的利益，對平衡承租人、出租人和第三人之間的利益具有重要意義。 承租人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)制度的歷史源遠(yuǎn)流長，在絕大多數(shù)大陸法系國家的民法中也都有對該權(quán)利的規(guī)制。我國也不例外，《民法通則意見》、《合同法》及2009年《最高人民法院關(guān)于審理城鎮(zhèn)房屋租賃合同糾紛案件具體應(yīng)用法律若干問題的解釋》等法律法規(guī)中均有對該權(quán)利的規(guī)制。但是，這些法律對于該制度大多是原則性的規(guī)定，伴隨著我國房地產(chǎn)市場的快速發(fā)展，該制度的使用也日益頻繁，隨之出現(xiàn)許多損害承租人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)的情形，其制度缺陷也越來越多的暴露出來，在一定程度上也造成司法適用上的混亂和困惑，，因此，無論在理論界還是在實務(wù)界，該制度都還有許多值得探討研究的問題。 本文根據(jù)現(xiàn)行法律規(guī)定，嘗試?yán)砬瀣F(xiàn)有概念與學(xué)者觀點，務(wù)求提出可以指導(dǎo)實踐的有效建議，使該制度能在實踐中發(fā)揮其應(yīng)有的作用。本文共分成以下四個部分： 第一章首先論述了承租人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)的基本理論，即其基本概念及性質(zhì)。承租人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)的性質(zhì)問題，也是該制度的核心問題，確定承租人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)的性質(zhì)問題是解決實踐中所遇爭議的理論基礎(chǔ)。我國民法學(xué)界圍繞承租人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)的性質(zhì)形成了形成權(quán)說、期待權(quán)說、物權(quán)說、債權(quán)說等學(xué)說，通過對這些學(xué)說的分析，闡明承租人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)的性質(zhì)是形成權(quán)，為解決實踐中的問題提供最基本的理論基礎(chǔ)。 第二章著重討論了承租人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)的行使問題，包括承租人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)的成立條件、行使條件、承租人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)行使中的“同等條件”以及該權(quán)利的行使期限。 第三章著重對侵害承租人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)后損害賠償?shù)恼埱髾?quán)基礎(chǔ)進(jìn)行論述。闡明形成權(quán)亦具有被侵害性，實踐中侵害承租人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)的種類主要有以下三種：在法律規(guī)定的合理期限內(nèi)未通知承租人導(dǎo)致其優(yōu)先購買權(quán)不能行使的、承租人行使優(yōu)先購買權(quán)的過程中受到不合理阻礙的、承租人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)行使后又最終目的落空的，對于以上這些侵害承租人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)的行為，侵害人均應(yīng)承擔(dān)相應(yīng)的損害賠償責(zé)任。 第四章主要討論了承租人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)受侵害后的救濟措施，筆者根據(jù)承租人有無行使其優(yōu)先購買權(quán)進(jìn)行分類，將侵害承租人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)的賠償形式及賠償范圍分為兩種情況進(jìn)行討論，即承租人未能行使其優(yōu)先購買權(quán)可獲得的賠償?shù)男问郊捌浞秶�，以及承租人行使�?yōu)先購買權(quán)后又目的落空的情形中可獲得的賠償形式及其范圍。
[Abstract]:The preemptive right of the lessee is one of the preemptive rights, which refers to the lessee who, in accordance with the law, sells the leased building to a third party during the tenure of the building.The right to purchase the leased house on equal terms.As an important civil legal system, this system protects the interests of vulnerable groups on the basis of balancing the autonomy of the will of the civil subject, and plays an important role in balancing the interests of the lessee, the lessor and the third party.The system of lessee's preemption right has a long history and is regulated in the civil law of most civil law countries.Our country is no exception. There are regulations on this right in "opinions on General principles of Civil Law", "contract Law" and "interpretation of several issues of the Supreme people's Court on the Application of laws in handling disputes over contract of Housing Lease in cities and towns" in 2009.However, these laws are mostly principled provisions for the system. With the rapid development of the real estate market in our country, the use of the system is becoming more and more frequent, and there are many cases that damage the lessee's preemptive right.Its system defects are more and more exposed, to a certain extent, it also causes confusion and confusion in judicial application. Therefore, whether in the theoretical or practical circles, the system still has many problems worth studying.According to the existing laws and regulations, this paper tries to clarify the existing concepts and scholars' viewpoints, and to put forward effective suggestions which can guide the practice, so that the system can play its due role in practice.This paper is divided into the following four parts:The first chapter discusses the basic theory of lessee's preemption right, that is, its basic concept and nature.The nature of the lessee's preemptive right is also the core of the system. The theoretical basis for resolving the disputes in practice is to determine the nature of the lessee's preemptive right.The scholars of civil law of our country have formed the theory of forming right, expectation right, real right and creditor's right around the nature of lessee's preemption right. Through the analysis of these theories, the author clarifies that the nature of lessee's preemption right is formative right.To solve the problems in practice to provide the most basic theoretical basis.The second chapter focuses on the exercise of the lessee's preemptive right, including the establishment conditions of the lessee's preemptive right, the conditions for exercising the preemptive right, the "equal conditions" in the exercise of the lessee's preemptive right, and the time limit for the exercise of the preemptive right.The third chapter focuses on the basis of claim for damages after preemption.It is clarified that the right of formation is also infringed. In practice, there are mainly three kinds of infringements on the preemptive right of the lessee: if the lessee is unable to exercise the preemptive right without notifying the lessee within a reasonable time limit stipulated by law,If the lessee is unreasonably obstructed in the process of exercising the preemptive right, and the final purpose of the lessee's preemptive right is defeated after the exercise of the preemptive right, the above acts infringe upon the lessee's preemptive right,The infringer shall bear the corresponding liability for damages.The fourth chapter mainly discusses the relief measures after the lessee's preemptive right is infringed, and the author classifies it according to whether the lessee has exercised the preemptive right.The form and scope of compensation for infringement of the lessee's preemptive right are discussed in two cases, that is, the form and scope of compensation that the lessee can obtain if he fails to exercise his preemptive right.And the form and scope of compensation which the lessee can obtain after exercising the preemptive right.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 張新榮;試論“優(yōu)先購買權(quán)”及其法律保護(hù)[J];法學(xué);1989年09期

2 史浩明;張鵬;;優(yōu)先購買權(quán)制度的法律技術(shù)分析[J];法學(xué);2008年09期

3 陸慧;;論侵害承租人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)的賠償問題[J];法制與社會;2012年33期

4 王麗莎;;承租人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)的損害賠償研究[J];河北法學(xué);2010年05期

5 戴孟勇;先買權(quán)的若干理論問題[J];清華大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2001年01期

6 王敬毅，楊麗君;形成權(quán)概念的意義及功能[J];外國法譯評;1996年02期

7 蔡養(yǎng)軍;我國法律中的優(yōu)先購買權(quán)評析[J];學(xué)海;2002年05期

8 陳亞東;論優(yōu)先購買權(quán)[J];上海政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年03期

本文編號：1719130